Examples of MH Entities in a sentence
The MH Member shall retain such documents and records for a period of not less than seven years and shall make such documents and records reasonably available during normal business hours to each other Member for inspection and copying, provided that such access does not unduly interfere with the management and business of any of the MH Entities.
For the avoidance of doubt, when CME Group’s Parent Aggregate Percentage interest goes below the CME Group Threshold, the MH Entities shall not be required to comply with Sections 9.1(c) or 9.1(h), but the CME Group Members shall retain their Tag-Along Right under Section 9.1(d) and MH shall retain its Drag-Along Right under Section 9.1(e).
The MH Entities are MH Investors United, LLC, MH Private Equity Fund, LLC, MH EPI Holdings LLC, and MH Investors Entertainment LLC.
Nor has plaintiff alleged the MH Entities were involved in the day-to-day operations of the debtor’s business.f) Conclusion Plaintiff failed to sufficiently plead facts to satisfy any of the five elements to the “single employer” test.
Mr. Speaker, Sir, access to basic services, quality infrastructure and quality dwelling is a catalyst for raising economic well-being.
She has brought this action against EPI and the MH Entities on behalf of herself and a class of 370 similarly- situation former employees of EPI.
Therefore, none of the MH Entities are a “single employer” with EPI for WARN Act purposes.CONCLUSION As stated above, the Court finds that plaintiff has failed to allege facts that support a plausible claim that any of the MH Entities are a “single employer” with EPI for WARN Act purposes.
We know this because no premium or discount is mentioned and the face value does not change over time.
They argue that plaintiff has failed to allege any particular facts to support her claims that defendants are a “single employer.” Therefore, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), made applicable to this adversary proceeding by Federal Rules of Bankruptcy Procedure 7012, the MH Entities have moved to dismiss the Complaint.
The MH Entities have moved to dismiss the complaint (the “Complaint”) based on the contention that they and the debtor are not a “single employer” under the WARN Act.