Examples of MD Solar in a sentence
MD Solar 1 - Shugart Valley Place, Md. Dep’t Env’t, https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Water/WetlandsandWaterways/Pages/MD_Solar_1.aspx.; Tier II Data Table, Md. Dep’t Nat.
MD Solar 1 - Shugart Valley Place, Joint Federal/State Application for the Alteration of any Floodplain, Waterway, Tidal or Nontidal Wetland in Maryland, Md. Dep’t Env’t, at part 6 [hereinafter MD Solar 1 Application], https://mde.maryland.gov/programs/Water/WetlandsandWaterways/Pages/MD_Solar_1.aspx.Part 6.
The creation of the second applicant, as a legal entity distinct from the first applicant, was no more than ‘a scheme designed to assist the business operated by the first and or second applicants to avoid its legal obligations towards its employees and the second respondent, in fraudem legis’; and Harris v MD Solar (Pty) Ltd t/a Suntank and Others [2016] ZALCJHB 348 para 21-26.
The MD Solar 1 project requires a Clean Water Act (“CWA”) section 404 permit, and Origis may not utilize Maryland’s programmatic general permit without review and authorization by theU.S. Army Corps of Engineers (“Corps”).
At the end of the lease term, or upon an early termination of the MD Solar Lease Agreement, the Maryland Solar Project, the facility site and the project agreements assigned under the MD Solar Lease documents are expected to revert back to the Maryland Solar Project Entity.
In response, MD Solar can only muster the baseless assumption—unsupported by any declarations—that the reference to the FPA “apparently was a drafting error, as the agreement is instead subject to PURPA.” MD Solar Opp’n at 4, n.6. MD Solar’s blanket claim erroneously presumes that any power sale by a QF is necessarily “pursuant to PURPA.” As explained above, QFs have the option of selling under PURPA contracts, outside PURPA under negotiated contracts, or into the wholesale market.
PURPA can be a basis for establishing contracts between independent power producers and traditional electric utilities, but it does not make such contracts immune from breach, in bankruptcy or otherwise.12 MD Solar’s claim that the MD Solar PPA was “intended to comply with FES’s commitments under the State of Maryland Public Service Commission Order No. 83788” is inapposite.
Like many other parties in interest, MD Solar took on the credit risk associated with entering a long term contract with FES.
All, or substantially all, of Check ‘N Go’s North Carolina revenues were derived from payday lending, so discontinuing payday lending would have been tantamount to closing Check ‘N Go’s North Carolina operations and eliminating the $12.9 million in annual North Carolina revenue.
The Maryland Solar Project Entity is expected to assign these project agreements to the Lessee for the term of the MD Solar Lease Agreement, pursuant to a partial assignment and assumption agreement.