Identical means systems, components, separate technical units and parts having identical geometric and mechanical characteristics and the materials used for the components of the vehicles;
Examples of Identical in a sentence
Identical S-parameters, obtained by VNA measurements after applying the first SOLT calibration, are the basis for all of the presented results.The measured test inductor is shown in fig.
Identical span of ordinate scales was chosen for easier comparison.
Identical residues in mollusk synapsin are shown in red, and those conserved in human and rat synapsins in grey.
Identical disposable order free dishes were used to serve the samples at 23 °C room temperature.
Identical behavior was evident for tests conducted at a particular stress level, suggesting that the well had been developed sufficiently to establish stable well skin conditions.
More Definitions of Identical
Identical means, in relation to the replacement of equipment or control apparatus, that the equipment or control apparatus is of the same type and size as the equipment or control apparatus being replaced, and is used in the same process, with the same materials.
Identical means ** of the ** material made at the ** scale, to confirm that it is the same as the ** in the ** based on (i) ** and ** (assay vs standard, ** by area **), (ii) moisture by **, (iii) **, (iv) **, (v) ** and ** — no significant unknown **, consistent with proposed structure, (vi) solid form comparison via ** (if drug would require a **), and (viii) any potentially ** (as assessed in silico) species (based on observed and **) must not be greater than the **.
Identical means that the tire pressure is the same after a pressure measurement with a gauge that measures to one-tenth (0.1) kPa accuracy and rounded to the nearest whole kPa, for at least the final two pressure measurements.
Identical exactly means. How similar is similar9 ? We all know by experience that we do not need a lot of precautions when shaking a die so as to launch it in a „regular‟ manner – leading to the probability distribution of a true die. In other words, it seems that in general we have a good idea what these „similar conditions‟ are; but that is not always the case. At this point the idea of partitioning we introduced in the preceding Section proves helful. Indeed, similar tests on similar systems means, in general: similar initiating system (or environment), similar test object, and similar probing system. These three subsystems should „act‟, in the repeated test sequence, in similar (enough) ways in order that a probability can be defined. Alterations or divergences in any of these three subsystems can lead to different probabilities (probability distributions) – the latter may not even be defined, i. e. existing. (Remember the sublimating die, or the inadequate randomization etc., which can lead to an undefined probability distribution of the die throws.) But again, how similar should these subsystems, or the events they generate, be ?