Case 1. ' (negotiations) means any case where negotiations take place between the parties with a view to the formation of a business relationship between them;
Case 1 means any case where the parties form or resolve to form a business relationship between them.
Case 1 means circumstances where a PRA-authorised person is the UK parent institution required by Chapter 2 of Title 2 of Part 1 of the capital requirements regulation to comply with requirements of the regulation on a consolidated basis, other than circumstances falling within Case 3;
Examples of Case 1 in a sentence
Case 1- The index goes up• An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty index moves up to 12000 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 250 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.
The cost or credit to the Owner from a change in the Work shall be determined in one or more of the following ways: Case 1.
Case 1- The index goes up• An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty index moves up to 3600 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 200 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.
Case 1- The index goes up An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty index moves up to 9900 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 250 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.
Case 1- The index goes up• An investor sells the Nifty Option described above before expiry:Suppose the Nifty 50 Index moves up to 3600 in the spot market and the premium has moved to Rs 200 and there are 15 days more left for the expiry.
More Definitions of Case 1
Case 1. ABA[ id, l ] returns 1 to all. According to the recast-ability properties of APDB, the RC[ id, l ] instance will terminate and recover a same value to all. The recast value can be valid and satisfy the global Predicate, then this value will be decided as output by all parties.
Case 1. The sender Pl was corrupted by A (before delivering lockl);
Case 1 means that K > KL,1 while ”case 2” means that K ≤ KL,1.
Case 1. If the value vl returned by RC[⟨id, l⟩] is valid, then output the value. • Case 2: If the value vl returned by RC[⟨id, l⟩] is not valid, the parties will go back to the elect-ID phase to execute MVBAunder[⟨id, k + 1⟩], until a valid value will be decided. Now, we prove that the honest parties would terminate in expected constant time, except with negligible probability. Due to the quality properties of the MVBA, the probability that ⟨l, lockl⟩ was proposed by the adversary is at most 1/2 for each MVBAunder instance with different identifi- cation ⟨id, k⟩. In addition, due to the recast-ability of APDB, whenever MVBAunder[⟨id, k⟩]’s output Σ ≤ − ≤ − → → ∞ ⟨ ⟩ ⟨l, lockl⟩ was not proposed by the adversary, a valid value can be collectively recovered by all honest parties due to RC[⟨id, l⟩]. So the probability that an externally valid vl is recover after invoking each MVBAunder[⟨id, k⟩] is at least p = 1/2. Let the event Ek represent that the protocol does not terminate when MVBAunder[ id, k ] has been invoked for k times, so the probability of the event Ek, Pr[Ek] (1 p)k. It is clear to see Pr[Ek] (1 p)k 0 when k , so the protocol eventually halts. Moreover, let K to be the random variable that the protocol just terminates when k = K, so E[K] ≤ ∞K=1 K(1−p)K−1p = 1/p = 2, indicating the protocol is expected to terminate after sequentially invoking MVBAunder[⟨id, k⟩] twice.
Case 1 the test session has a matching session S S
Case 1. This reservation agreement is subject to the condition precedent of obtaining the loan / loans referred to above. This condition precedent shall be deemed to have been fulfilled upon the submission by the requested financial institution/institutions of one or more regular loan offers corresponding to the aforementioned characteristics. In the case where the GRANTEE is refused the loan/loans specified in this clause, which he must prove by a letter from the lender/lenders, he shall notify the GRANTOR, within 8 days of that information, by registered letter with acknowledgement of receipt. The GRANTOR shall then regain the freedom to dispose of the property subject to this agreement. If the amount of the loans is lower than the requested loan amount, the purchaser may waive this condition precedent, by writing by hand the note referred to in Article L 312-17 of the French Consumer Code. If the purchaser intends to waive this condition precedent, he must notify the seller and write by hand the note referred to in Article L 312-7 of the French Consumer Code. The GRANTOR informs the GRANTEE that his first-ranking seller’s preferential right may only be assigned to the financial institutions if the PURCHASER’s own funds are used to pay for the initial calls for funds, prior to the release of the loan/loans, and if the financial institutions agree to release, unconditionally and simply upon presentation of the calls for funds, all the funds borrowed to the SELLER. Similarly, the SELLER’s rescissory action shall only be waived as from the release in full of the purchaser’s own funds to the seller. As an essential condition of the reservation, the GRANTOR and the GRANTEE agree that:
Case 1. The Peerless Loan is not completely reduced The Peerless Loan has a current balance outstanding of $16,647. If this value is reduced to $12,000 by July 31, 2006, this would be $4,000 above the target value of $8,000 ($12,000 - $8,000 = $4000). The resulting adjustment to book value would be made by subtracting $2,400 (60% * $4,000 = $2400). This would result in a book value of $89,499.826 ($91,899.826 - $2,400 = $89,499.826). The Adjusted Book Value would be $8.51 ($89,499.826 / 10,516.900 = $8.51). The Exchange Ratio would then be 1.293. This is calculated by dividing Alesco’s share price of $11 by the Adjusted Book Value of $8.51 ($11 / $8.51 = 1.293). The Repurchase Amount would then be $21,000 ($25,000 - $4,000 = $21,000) Case 2: The East West Loan is not completely reduced The East West Loan has a current balance outstanding of $2,739. If this value is reduced to $1,000 by July 31, 2006, this would be $1,000 above the target value of $ 0 ($2,739 - $1,739 = $1000). The resulting adjustment to book value would be made by subtracting $1,000 (100% * $1,000 = $1000). This would result in a book value of $90,899.826 ($91,899.826 - $1,000 = $90,899.826). The Adjusted Book Value would be $8.64 (90,899.826 / 10,516.900 = $8.64). The Exchange Ratio would then be 1.273. This is calculated by dividing Alesco’s share price of $11 by the Adjusted Book Value of $8.64 ($11 / $8.51 = 1.273). The Repurchase Amount would then be $24,000 ($25,000 - $1,000 = $24,000)