Scope of Patents Sample Clauses

Scope of Patents. Please xxxx the relevant boxes which are subject to the Bilateral Agreement: ☐ all Licensed Patents with respect to BD Software Standards for the products marked above. ☐ all Licensed Patents with respect to DVD Software Standards for the products marked above. ☐ all Licensed Patents with respect to CD Standards for the products marked above. ☐ other [insert Descriptions here ]
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Scope of Patents. To the best of Debtor's knowledge and belief, except as noted in Schedule 1.2(a), each patent owned or licensed by the Debtor is broad enough in scope to preclude substantial competition with the product or good covered thereby.
Scope of Patents. Each Party shall have an obligation, and hereby covenants and agrees, that it will use commercially reasonable efforts to seek the broadest possible patent protection in each Primary Patent or Improvement Continuation Patent. Furthermore, each Party covenants and agrees that it will allow the other Party to review all Primary Patents and Improvement Continuation Patents prior to filing, and if requested to do so, such Party shall augment the patent application to include additional disclosure provided by the other Party to support claims that cover the other Party's technical applications as defined in this Agreement.
Scope of Patents. Each patent owned or licensed by each Debtor is broad enough in scope to preclude substantial competition with the product or good covered thereby.

Related to Scope of Patents

  • Licensed Patents Licensee shall be responsible for all further patent prosecution with respect to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technologies set out in Exhibit “A”. Licensee may select the patent agent for the prosecution of the Licensed Patents, subject to the approval of Licensor as the patent owner, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld. Licensee shall provide Licensor with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Licensed Patents so that Licensor may be informed and apprised of and meaningfully consulted as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall keep all such documentation confidential. In the event the Licensee does not agree that any given patent application or patent should be filed, prosecuted or maintained (hereinafter referred to as a “Refused Licensed Patent”) in a particular jurisdiction(s) Licensee shall indicate such disagreement in writing (hereinafter “Refusal Notice”) and upon Licensor’s receipt of such Refusal Notice Licensor shall have the right unilaterally to make, prosecute and maintain such Refused Licensed * Confidential Information, indicated by [***], has been omitted from this filing and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission Patent in such jurisdiction(s) in the name of its owners, at Licensor’s expense, and Licensee shall not have any rights or obligations to such Refused Licensed Patent in such jurisdiction(s); provided, however, that Licensee shall retain all of its ownership rights in any Refused Licensed Patent that is a Co-Owned Technology. In such case Licensor shall provide Licensee with copies of all relevant documentation related to the filing and prosecution of the Refused Licensed Patents so that Licensee may be informed and apprised of and be meaningfully consulted with as to the continuing prosecution. Licensor shall have no obligation to continue prosecution or maintenance of any Refused Licensed Patent and may abandon same without any prior notice or any obligation to Licensee. Both Licensee and Licensor shall make best efforts to respond promptly to any request from the other Party for input or assistance with respect to matters pertaining to the Licensed Patents. Licensee shall use reasonable efforts to amend any patent application to include claims reasonably requested by the other Party and required to protect the Licensed Technology. In addition to Licensee’s obligations pursuant to section 4.1 above, Licensee shall be solely responsible for all patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) from the Effective Date onward, including all costs relating to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to the new patent agents selected by Licensee and approved by Licensor. For any patent and legal costs relating to the Licensed Patents and Licensed Technology (excluding Refused Licensed Patents) paid by Licensor after the Effective Date (including, without limitation, those expenses related to patentability assessments and drafting, filing, prosecution, maintenance, and taxes (the “Patent Costs”)), Licensee shall promptly reimburse Licensor for such Patent Costs upon receipt of an invoice from Licensor for such expenses. For any work in progress with respect to the Licensed Patents for which the Patent Costs have not already been paid by Licensor to its patent firm prior to the transfer of the Licensed Patents to Licensee’s patent agent, Licensor will direct its patent firm to copy Licensee on all such invoices from said patent firm and Licensee will promptly pay said invoices directly to Licensor’s patent firm.

  • Patent Rights The State and the U. S. Department of Transportation shall have the royalty free, nonexclusive and irrevocable right to use and to authorize others to use any patents developed by the Engineer under this contract.

  • Joint Patents (i) Intrexon shall be responsible for filing, prosecuting and maintaining any Joint Patents at its own cost and expense, except that ARES TRADING shall be responsible for maintaining at its own cost and expense any issued Joint Patents which are requested by ARES TRADING and directed exclusively to the composition, formulation, manufacture or use of one or more Products (“Product Specific Patents”). ARES TRADING and Intrexon shall cooperate, to the extent such is reasonable and can be done without substantially compromising the value and or protection of any Inventions, to develop a suitable portfolio of Product Specific Patents and shall coordinate on the territory (country list) where protection is intended. To this end, during the Term ARES TRADING may request, at its discretion, that Intrexon file one or more continuation or divisional applications (as appropriate) within an application for Joint Patent for the express purpose of creating Product Specific Patents, which request shall be honored to the extent reasonable, permitted by applicable laws, and otherwise consistent with this Agreement. Each Joint Owner shall fully cooperate with the other Joint Owner in connection with the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents. The responsible Joint Owner for a particular Joint Patent shall consult with the other Joint Owner, shall keep the other Joint Owner reasonably informed of the status of such Joint Patent, and shall promptly provide the other Joint Owner with drafts of all proposed material filings and correspondences with the patent authorities with respect to such Joint Patent for such other Joint Owner’s review and comment prior to the submission of such proposed filings and correspondences. The responsible Joint Owner shall confer with the other Joint Owner and take into consideration such other Joint Owner’s comments prior to submitting such filings and correspondences, provided that such other Joint Owner shall provide such comments within [*****] days of receiving the draft filings and correspondences from the responsible Joint Owner. If such other Joint Owner does not provide comments within such period of time, then such other Joint Owner shall be deemed to have no comment to such proposed filings or correspondences. In case of disagreement between the Joint Owners with respect to the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such Joint Patents, the final decision shall be made by the responsible Joint Owner.

  • Patents and Patent Applications To the Company’s knowledge, all patents and patent applications owned by or licensed to the Company or under which the Company has rights have been duly and properly filed and maintained; to the knowledge of the Company, the parties prosecuting such applications have complied with their duty of candor and disclosure to the USPTO in connection with such applications; and the Company is not aware of any facts required to be disclosed to the USPTO that were not disclosed to the USPTO and which could reasonably be expected to preclude the grant of a patent in connection with any such application or could reasonably be expected to form the basis of a finding of invalidity with respect to any patents that have issued with respect to such applications.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.