Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Sample Clauses

Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users who have waited more than 62 days during the Quarter exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £1,000 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold Quarterly A CR R
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users waiting 6 weeks or more at the end of the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £200 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold Monthly A CS CR D A&E waits
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. £100 per event where > 60 minutes (in total, not aggregated with E.B.S.8a consequence) in the relevant month Monthly AM E.B.S.5 Trolley waits in A&E not longer than 12 hours* >0 Review of Service Quality Performance Reports £1,000 per incidence in the relevant month Monthly A+E E.B.S.6 No urgent operation should be cancelled for a second time* >0 Review of Service Quality Performance Reports £5,000 per incidence in the relevant month Monthly A CR VTE risk assessment: all inpatient Service Users undergoing risk assessment for VTE, as defined in Contract Technical Guidance 95% Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Issue of Contract Performance Notice and subsequent process in accordance with GC9 Quarterly A Duty of candour Each failure to notify the Relevant Person of a suspected or actual Reportable Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Recovery of the cost of the episode of care, or £10,000 if the cost of the episode of care is unknown or indeterminate Monthly All National Quality Requirement Threshold (2016/17) Method of Measurement (2016/17) Consequence of breach Timing of application of consequence Application Patient Safety Incident in accordance with Regulation 20 of the 2014 Regulations Completion of a valid NHS Number field in mental health and acute commissioning data sets submitted via SUS, as defined in Contract Technical Guidance 99% Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Where the number of breaches in the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £10 in respect of each excess breach above that threshold Monthly A MH MHSS Completion of a valid NHS Number field in A&E commissioning data sets submitted via SUS, as defined in Contract Technical Guidance 95% Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Where the number of breaches in the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £10 in respect of each excess breach above that threshold Monthly A&E Completion of Mental Health Services Data Set ethnicity coding for all Service Users, as defined in Contract Technical Guidance Operating standard of 90% Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Where the number of breaches in the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £10 in respect of each excess breach above that threshold Monthly MH MHSS Completion of IAPT Operating Review of Service Quality Where the number of Monthly MH National Quality Requirement Threshold (2016/17) Method of Measurement (2016/17) Consequence of breach Timin...
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of breaches in the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £10 in respect of each excess breach above that threshold Monthly MH MHSS
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users waiting more than 18 weeks at the end of the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £300 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold Monthly Services to which 18 Weeks applies Diagnostic test waiting times
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users in the month not admitted, transferred or discharged within 4 hours exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £120 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold. To the extent that the number of such Service Users exceeds 15% of A&E attendances in the relevant month, no further consequence will be applied in respect of the month Monthly A+E U Cancer waits - 2 week wait E.B.6 Percentage of Service Users referred urgently with suspected cancer by a GP waiting no more than two weeks for first outpatient appointment* Operating standard of 93% Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Where the number of Service Users who have waited more than two weeks during the Quarter exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £200 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold Quarterly A CR R
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users who have waited more than 31 days during the Quarter exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £1,000 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold Quarterly A CR R Cancer waits – 62 days
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of breaches in the month exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £10 in respect of each excess breach above that threshold Monthly MH Completion of Mental Health Services Data Set ethnicity coding for all detained and informal Service Users, as defined in Contract Technical Guidance Operating standard of 90%
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users in the month not admitted, transferred or discharged within 4 hours exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £120 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold. To the extent that the number of such Service Users exceeds 15% of A&E attendances in the relevant month, no further consequence will be applied in respect of the month Monthly A+E U Cancer waits - 2 week wait
Review of Service Quality Performance Reports. Where the number of Service Users in the Quarter who have waited more than 62 days during the Quarter exceeds the tolerance permitted by the threshold, £1,000 in respect of each such Service User above that threshold Quarterly A CR R Ambulance Service Response Times (With effect from 1 April 2018) Category 1 (life-threatening) calls – percentage of calls resulting in a response arriving within 15 minutes ** Operating standard that 90th centile is no greater than 15 minutes Review of Service Quality Performance Reports Issue of a Contract Performance Notice and subsequent process in accordance with GC9 Quarterly AM (With effect from 1 April 2018) Category 1 (life-threatening) calls – mean time taken for a response to arrive ** Mean is no greater than 7 minutes
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.