Results of the questioner Sample Clauses

Results of the questioner. The questioner was divided into three parts, each representing different aspect of our research. Part one looks into the preferences of the humanitarian organizations in respect to lead time, punctuality, flexibility, customized products, long-term contracts (LTA) and the extension of long-term agreements. The goal of this questioner is to find the preferences of the humanitarian organizations, and relate it to the theory. We wish to discover witch kind of relation they have to their suppliers, and what kind of attributes do they value from their suppliers. Do they value long-term relations, or only sourcing from the cheapest every time? Do they value punctuality and flexibility? If so this would be an indicator that a supplier placed with inventory closer to the beneficiaries would be a preferred supplier for a humanitarian catastrophe. Part two deals with ROFI Industirer As and their product spectrum, and from the different organizations point of view, how these products relate to the different kinds of natural disasters. These answers were inconclusive, and therefore scraped. Part three reveals the different organizations preferences regarding sourcing and pre- positioning, also in respect to ROFI Industrier AS and their product spectrum. Here we only found the answers form the question regarding sourcing conclusive and all other results where scraped. Anonymity 100 % 50 % 0 % yes no not relevant Percentage of respondents Before the respondents started on the questioner we gave them the opportunity to claim anonymity for the information they provided. 58% (7 out of 12) of the respondents choose this option. In respect of this, no organization are mentioned with name in relation to the questioner. Figure 10-1: Percentage of Participants wanting to be anonymous
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Results of the questioner

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • BID TABULATION AND RESULTS Bid tabulations shall be available thirty (30) days after opening on the Orange County website at: xxxx://xxxx.xxxx.xxx/orangebids/bidresults/results.asp or upon notice of intended action, whichever is sooner.

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS We may provide Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) for reference on xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx. The FAQs are not a part of any Program agreement, and the Program enrollment application, ACH authorization, and these Terms will control in the event any conflicting information is contained in the FAQs.

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • Narrative Results i. A description of Xxxxxxx’x billing and coding system(s), including the identification, by position description, of the personnel involved in coding and billing.

  • - OWNERSHIP/USE OF THE RESULTS II.3.1 Unless stipulated otherwise in this agreement, ownership of the results of the action, including industrial and intellectual property rights, and of the reports and other documents relating to it shall be vested in the beneficiary.

  • Financial Data The Contractor shall submit evidence satisfactory to the Design Professional that all payrolls, material bills, and other indebtedness connected with the work have been paid.

  • Errors, Questions, and Complaints a. In case of errors or questions about your transactions, you should as soon as possible contact us as set forth in Section 6 of the General Terms above.

  • Research Questions The study addresses the following questions.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.