Question 1b Sample Clauses

Question 1b. Why did the United States not seek to incorporate the specific re- strictions and conditions detailed in the Hyde Act into the NSG exemption permit- ting civilian nuclear trade with India, so that all other NSG members would be ex- plicitly bound by the same restrictions that U.S. suppliers face? Answer. The U.S. sought an NSG exception for India that was consistent with the Hyde Act and, at the same time, capable of commanding a consensus within the Group. While the Hyde Act does not require incorporation of its specific terms and restrictions in the NSG exception, we pursued the NSG exception with an eye to the Hyde Act both as a matter of nonproliferation policy and so as to protect U.S. industry from any competitive disadvantage. The result is an NSG exception that is consistent with the Hyde Act, taking into account of the terms and restrictions of the Hyde Act.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Question 1b. To Provide 2 Medium-rise Hotels at the Southern Edge of the Coliseum Podium 5% 13% 36% 46% Agree
Question 1b. If the Selling Shareholder is not a natural person, please indicate whether the Selling Shareholder is one of the following (and circle as appropriate): · a reporting company under the Exchange Act · a majority owned subsidiary of a reporting company under the Exchange Act, · a registered investment fund under the 1940 Act.
Question 1b. To provide 2 medium-rise hotels at the southern edge of the Coliseum podium - With regard to providing 2 medium-rise hotels at the southern edge of the Coliseum Podium, about 46% of the respondents did not agree with the proposal. Only 36% and 13% of the respondents agreed with or had no comment on the proposal. - Many respondents expressed their concern on the need of 2 more hotels in the area because there were already a number of hotels nearby and most of them were used for serviced apartments. There was another concern on the height of the hotels. The respondents considered that low-rise hotels (less than 10 storeys) would be more appropriate.
Question 1b. In which point did you get the best results?

Related to Question 1b

  • Right to Consult Counsel The Warrant Agent may at any time consult with legal counsel satisfactory to it (who may be legal counsel for the Company), and the Warrant Agent shall incur no liability or responsibility to the Company or to any Holder for any action taken, suffered or omitted by it in good faith in accordance with the opinion or advice of such counsel.

  • No Proceedings or Litigation No action, suit or proceeding before any arbitrator or any governmental authority shall have been commenced, and no investigation by any governmental authority shall have been threatened, against the Company or any Subsidiary, or any of the officers, directors or affiliates of the Company or any Subsidiary seeking to restrain, prevent or change the transactions contemplated by this Agreement, or seeking damages in connection with such transactions.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!