Common use of Quality Assurance and Quality Control Clause in Contracts

Quality Assurance and Quality Control. The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of their internal review and mark-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line mark-ups are submitted. The State’s project manager will require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal mark-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal mark-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal mark-up document. The Engineer shall perform Quality Control/Quality Assurance on all survey procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the State. If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a survey submittal it becomes apparent to the State that the submittal contains errors, omissions, or inconsistencies, the State may cease its review and immediately return the submittal to the Engineer for appropriate action by the Engineer. A submittal returned to the Engineer for this reason is not a submittal for purposes of the submission schedule.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control. The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of their internal review and markxxxx-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line markxxxx-ups are submitted. The State’s project manager will may require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal markxxxx-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal markxxxx-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal mark-xxxx- up document. The Engineer shall perform Quality Control/Quality Assurance on all survey procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the State. If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a survey submittal it becomes apparent to the State that the submittal contains errors, omissions, or inconsistencies, the State may cease its review and immediately return the submittal to the Engineer for appropriate action by the Engineer. A submittal returned to the Engineer for this reason is not a submittal for purposes of the submission schedule.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control. The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of their internal review and markxxxx-up of that deliverable as DocuSign Envelope ID: CCC15E4F-025E-45ED-8647-4B6C2DCF3710 preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line markxxxx-ups are submitted. The State’s project manager will may require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal markxxxx-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal markxxxx-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal mark-xxxx- up document. The Engineer shall perform Quality Control/Control and Quality Assurance on all survey procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the State. If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a survey submittal it becomes apparent to the State that the submittal contains errors, omissions, or inconsistencies, the State may cease its review and immediately return the submittal to the Engineer for appropriate action by the Engineer. A submittal returned to the Engineer for this reason is not a submittal for purposes of the submission schedule.

Quality Assurance and Quality Control. The Engineer shall provide peer review at all levels. For each deliverable, the Engineer shall have some evidence of their internal review and markxxxx-up of that deliverable as preparation for submittal. A milestone submittal is not considered complete unless the required milestone documents and associated internal red-line markxxxx-ups are submitted. The State’s project manager will require the Engineer to submit the Engineer’s internal markxxxx-up (red-lines) or comments developed as part the Engineer’s quality control step. When internal markxxxx-ups are requested by the State in advance, the State, at its sole discretion, may reject the actual deliverable should the Engineer fail to provide the evidence of quality control. The Engineer shall clearly label each document submitted for quality assurance as an internal markxxxx-up document. The Engineer shall perform Quality Control/Quality Assurance on all survey procedures, field surveys, data, and products prior to delivery to the State. If, at any time, during the course of reviewing a survey submittal it becomes apparent to the State that the submittal contains errors, omissions, or inconsistencies, the State may cease its review and immediately return the submittal to the Engineer for appropriate action by the Engineer. A submittal returned to the Engineer for this reason is not a submittal for purposes of the submission schedule.