Ohio Improvement Process Clause Samples

The Ohio Improvement Process clause outlines the procedures and standards for implementing continuous improvement initiatives within organizations or educational institutions in Ohio. It typically establishes a structured framework for identifying areas needing enhancement, setting measurable goals, and monitoring progress through data-driven decision-making. By formalizing these steps, the clause ensures that improvement efforts are systematic and collaborative, ultimately fostering accountability and sustained organizational growth.
Ohio Improvement Process. The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) is the collaborative model used in the district for participation in academic and non- academic decision-making. The three areas include Teacher Based Team (TBT), Building Leadership Team (BLT) and District Leadership Team (DLT). The goal for the Ohio Improvement Process is to improve educational outcomes for students. All teachers shall participate in Teacher Based Teams. Participation in Building Leadership Team and District Leadership Team is voluntary. Any teacher wishing to participate in either Building or District Leadership Teams shall submit their interest to the Superintendent in writing for consideration. The Association President may also provide recommendations in writing of individuals for Building and District Leadership Teams to the Superintendent for consideration.
Ohio Improvement Process. The Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) is the collaborative model used in the District for participation in academic and non-academic decision- making. The three areas include Teacher Based Team (TBT), Building Leadership Team (BLT), and District Leadership Team (DLT). The goal for the Ohio Improvement Process is to improve educational outcomes for students. The administration will rotate TBT times during the day to ensure that the same teachers are not consistently losing planning time. The NEA President will be a member of the DLT.
Ohio Improvement Process. TBT is defined as the teacher-based team working with the Ohio Improvement Process.

Related to Ohio Improvement Process

  • Needs Improvement the Educator’s performance on a standard or overall is below the requirements of a standard or overall, but is not considered to be unsatisfactory at this time. Improvement is necessary and expected.

  • School Improvement The parties do hereby mutually agree that the school improvement process currently in effect will continue. Any plan developed by the committees shall not be in conflict with the master agreement or board policy.

  • The Performance Improvement Process (a) The Performance Improvement Process will focus on the risks of non- performance and problem-solving. It may include one or more of the following actions: a requirement that the HSP develop and implement an improvement plan that is acceptable to the Funder; the conduct of a Review; an amendment of the HSP’s obligations; an in-year, or year-end, adjustment to the Funding, among other possible means of responding to the Performance Factor or improving performance. (b) Any performance improvement process begun under a prior service accountability agreement that was not completed under the prior agreement will continue under this Agreement. Any performance improvement required by a Funder under a prior service accountability agreement will be deemed to be a requirement of this Agreement until fulfilled or waived by the Funder.

  • Improvement Plan A detailed, written plan initiated by the evaluator. The teacher may provide input at the meeting to review the plan. Improvement plans are utilized when a teacher receives an Evaluation Rating of Ineffective or when an administrator utilizes discretion to place any teacher on an improvement plan at any time based on any individual deficiency in the evaluation system. The approved form for the Improvement Plan is attached to this agreement as Appendix A-9.

  • Quality Improvement The Parties must develop QI activities specifically for the oversight of the requirements of this MOU, including, without limitation, any applicable performance measures and QI initiatives, including those to prevent duplication of services, as well as reports that track referrals, Member engagement, and service utilization. Such QI activities must include processes to monitor the extent to which Members are able to access mental health services across SMHS and NSMHS, and Covered Service utilization. The Parties must document these QI activities in policies and procedures.