High Expectations, Low Results Sample Clauses

High Expectations, Low Results. The assessment of COP24 must necessarily come to a mixed conclusion. On the one hand, the UNFCCC process once more failed to deliver what it set out to deliver, i.e. mobilising action at a scale that is sufficient to prevent dangerous climate change. A strong call for action was missing despite the steady drumbeat of scientific warnings and mounting climate impacts. On the other hand, COP24 delivered a sound technical result with the adoption of the rulebook and thus fulfilled the other half of the expectations. However, it bears noting that the United Nations are a negotiating platform of sovereign states, not a centralized world government. Negotiators always have to refer back to their national capitals before making any concessions on their positions. International conferences can therefore only rarely take decisions that have not previously been prepared nationally. This is true in particular for the climate regime, which is characterized by the constraint to move forward by consensus. Since 0000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx has blocked any attempt to agree on Rules of Procedure that include voting by a three-fourths majority if all efforts at reaching consensus have failed. As we have analyzed previously, the climate regime is thus delivering on two important goals, namely providing significance and legitimation for climate policies. It has severe difficulties, however, to reach agreement on the allocation of scarce resources like the atmosphere.62 Given recent rollbacks in key countries, in particular the US and Brazil, the adoption of robust implementation guidelines for the Paris Agreement is therefore not a small achievement. It sends a signal that the global community is still able to come to a multilateral agreement on the procedural way forward, and that the vast majority of countries still sees climate change as a major concern. It helped, of course, that the US has a genuine interest in sound rules and thus was rather supportive. China, on the other hand, deviated to some extent from its former position that 59 For a critical assessment of the potential and limits of non-state actors see Xxxxxx Xxxx, Xxxx Xxxxx, Harro xxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Iacobuta, Xxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, et al. ‘Promises and Risks of Nonstate Action in Climate and Sustainability Governance’ (2019) Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, January, e572 60 Lukas Hermwille, ‘Making Initiatives Resonate: How Can Non-State Initiatives Advance National Contributio...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to High Expectations, Low Results

  • Justification and Anticipated Results The Privacy Act requires that each matching agreement specify the justification for the program and the anticipated results, including a specific estimate of any savings. 5 U.S.C. § 552a(o)(1)(B).

  • Evaluation Results A. Evaluation results shall be used:

  • Expected Results VA’s agreement with DoD to provide educational assistance is a statutory requirement of Chapter 1606, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 1607, Title 10, U.S.C., Chapter 30, Title 38, U.S.C. and Chapter 33, Title 38, U.S.C (Post-9/11 GI Xxxx). These laws require VA to make payments to eligible veterans, service members, guard, reservist, and family members under the transfer of entitlement provisions. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 1606 is placed on the DoD. The responsibility of determining basic eligibility for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on VA, while the responsibility of providing initial eligibility data for Chapter 30 and Chapter 33 is placed on DoD. Thus, the two agencies must exchange data to ensure that VA makes payments only to those who are eligible for a program. Without an exchange of enrollment and eligibility data, VA would not be able to establish or verify applicant and recipient eligibility for the programs. Subject to the due process requirements, set forth in Article VII.B.1., 38 U.S.C. §3684A, VA may suspend, terminate, or make a final denial of any financial assistance on the basis of data produced by a computer matching program with DoD. To minimize administrative costs of implementation of the law and to maximize the service to the veteran or service member, a system of data exchanges and subsequent computer matching programs was developed. The purposes of the computer matching programs are to minimize the costs of administering the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; facilitate accurate payment to eligible veterans or service members training under the Chapter of the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Active Duty, the Xxxxxxxxxx GI Xxxx — Selected Reserve, Reserve Educational Assistance Program, and the Post-9/11 GI Xxxx program; and to avoid payment to those who lose eligibility. The current automated systems, both at VA and DoD, have been developed over the last twenty-two years. The systems were specifically designed to utilize computer matching in transferring enrollment and eligibility data to facilitate accurate payments and avoid incorrect payments. The source agency, DMDC, stores eligibility data on its computer based system of record. The cost of providing this data to VA electronically are minimal when compared to the cost DMDC would incur if the data were forwarded to VA in a hard-copy manner. By comparing records electronically, VA avoids the personnel costs of inputting data manually as well as the storage costs of the DMDC documents. This results in a VA estimated annual savings of $26,724,091 to VA in mailing and data entry costs. DoD reported an estimated annual savings of $12,350,000. A cost-benefit analysis is at Attachment 1. In the 32 years since the inception of the Chapter 30 program, the cost savings of using computer matching to administer the benefit payments for these educational assistance programs have remained significant. The implementation of Chapter 33 has impacted the Chapter 30 program over the past 8 years (fiscal year 2010 through fiscal year 2017). Statistics show a decrease of 23 percent in the number of persons who ultimately use Chapter 30 from fiscal year 2015 to 2016. The number of persons who use Chapter 33 has consistently been above 700,000 in the past four years. VA foresees continued cost savings due to the number of persons eligible for the education programs.‌

  • SERVICE MONITORING, ANALYSES AND ORACLE SOFTWARE 11.1 We continuously monitor the Services to facilitate Oracle’s operation of the Services; to help resolve Your service requests; to detect and address threats to the functionality, security, integrity, and availability of the Services as well as any content, data, or applications in the Services; and to detect and address illegal acts or violations of the Acceptable Use Policy. Oracle monitoring tools do not collect or store any of Your Content residing in the Services, except as needed for such purposes. Oracle does not monitor, and does not address issues with, non-Oracle software provided by You or any of Your Users that is stored in, or run on or through, the Services. Information collected by Oracle monitoring tools (excluding Your Content) may also be used to assist in managing Oracle’s product and service portfolio, to help Oracle address deficiencies in its product and service offerings, and for license management purposes.

  • Trunk Group Architecture and Traffic Routing The Parties shall jointly engineer and configure Local/IntraLATA Trunks over the physical Interconnection arrangements as follows:

  • How Do I Get More Information? For more information, including the full Notice, Claim Forms and Settlement Agreement go to xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, contact the settlement administrator at 0-000-000-0000, or call Class Counsel at 1-866-354-3015. Exhibit E UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Xxxxx v. AvMed, Inc., Case No. 10-cv-24513 If You Paid for or Received Insurance from AvMed, Inc. at Any Time Through December of 2009, You May Be Part of a Class Action Settlement. IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ THIS NOTICE CAREFULLY. THIS NOTICE RELATES TO THE PENDENCY OF A CLASS ACTION LAWSUIT AND, IF YOU ARE A MEMBER OF THE SETTLEMENT CLASSES, CONTAINS IMPORTANT INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR RIGHTS TO MAKE A CLAIM UNDER THE SETTLEMENT OR TO OBJECT TO THE SETTLEMENT (A federal court authorized this notice. It is not a solicitation from a lawyer.) Your legal rights are affected whether or not you act. Please read this notice carefully. YOUR LEGAL RIGHTS AND OPTIONS IN THIS SETTLEMENT SUBMIT A CLAIM FORM This is the only way to receive a payment. EXCLUDE YOURSELF You will receive no benefits, but you will retain any rights you currently have to xxx the Defendant about the claims in this case. OBJECT Write to the Court explaining why you don’t like the Settlement. GO TO THE HEARING Ask to speak in Court about your opinion of the Settlement. DO NOTHING You won’t get a share of the Settlement benefits and will give up your rights to xxx the Defendant about the claims in this case. These rights and options – and the deadlines to exercise them – are explained in this Notice. QUESTIONS? CALL 0-000-000-0000 TOLL FREE, OR VISIT XXX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.XXX PARA UNA NOTIFICACIÓN EN ESPAÑOL, LLAMAR O VISITAR NUESTRO WEBSITE BASIC INFORMATION

  • Designated Teacher for Looked After Children 17A) The Academy Trust will in respect of the Academy act in accordance with, and be bound by, all relevant statutory and regulatory provisions and have regard to any guidance and codes of practice issued pursuant to such provisions, as they apply at any time to a maintained school, relating to the designation of a person to manage the teaching and learning programme for children who are looked after by a LA and are registered pupils at the school. For the purpose of this clause, any reference to the governing body of a maintained school in such statutory and regulatory provisions, or in any guidance and code of practice issued pursuant to such provisions, shall be deemed to be references to the Governing Body of the Academy Trust. Teachers and other staff

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is an experienced and knowledgeable investor in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, title, reservoir engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Properties, the value thereof and title thereto.

  • Access Toll Connecting Trunk Group Architecture 9.2.1 If CBB chooses to subtend a Verizon access Tandem, CBB’s NPA/NXX must be assigned by CBB to subtend the same Verizon access Tandem that a Verizon NPA/NXX serving the same Rate Center Area subtends as identified in the LERG.

  • Historically Underutilized Businesses Subcontract Reports a) Vendor shall electronically provide each Customer with Vendor’s relevant Historically Underutilized Business Subcontracting Report, pursuant to the Contract, as required by Chapter 2161, Texas Government Code. Reports shall also be submitted to DIR.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.