Common use of EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY Clause in Contracts

EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY. ‌ Faculty who have tenure shall be evaluated once every three (3) years for the purpose of improving instruction with respect to the criteria set forth in sections 5.2 and 7.2. Faculty scheduled for such review shall initiate the peer review procedure included in Section 7.4; and 2) prepare documentation based on criteria in Section 7.2 that describes their professional career growth at MSU – Northern since their last evaluation. The documentation described in part 2) above should describe and highlight teaching competence, service and scholarly activity that has occurred since the last evaluation, but does not need to be as extensive as the portfolios submitted for promotion or tenure. Upon completion of the peer review, but no later than November 15, the faculty member scheduled for review shall meet with the college chair to discuss his/her achievements since the last evaluation and establish objectives to be accomplished prior to the next evaluation. The college chair shall forward to the Xxxxxxx and to the faculty member a written evaluation based upon this meeting no later than February 1. Based on these evaluations, the Xxxxxxx will submit a written evaluation with recommendations for improvement should they be deemed necessary to the Chancellor and a copy to the faculty member by March 1.

EVALUATION OF TENURED FACULTY. ‌ Faculty who have tenure shall be evaluated once every three (3) years for the purpose of improving instruction with respect to the criteria set forth in sections 5.2 and 7.2. Faculty scheduled for such review shall initiate the peer review procedure included in Section 7.4; and 2) prepare documentation based on criteria in Section 7.2 that describes their professional career growth at MSU – Northern since their last evaluation. The documentation described in part 2) above should describe and highlight teaching competence, service and scholarly activity that has occurred since the last evaluation, but does not need to be as extensive as the portfolios submitted for promotion or tenure. Upon completion of the peer review, but no later than November 15, the faculty member scheduled for review shall meet with the college chair to discuss his/her achievements since the last evaluation and establish objectives to be accomplished prior to the next evaluation. The college chair shall forward to the Xxxxxxx and to the faculty member a written evaluation based upon this meeting no later than February 1. Based on these evaluations, the Xxxxxxx will submit a written evaluation with recommendations for improvement should they be deemed necessary to the Chancellor and a copy to the faculty member by March 1.