Demand Responsive Transit (DRT Sample Clauses

Demand Responsive Transit (DRT. Although there does not appear to exist a generally accepted definition within the literature, some common elements are (Xxxxxxx et al. 2012):  DRT can be situated between regular public transport services (which are usually served by buses) and completely personalised services provided by taxis.  DRT services can be flexible on any of the following features (or combination of these features): route, origin–destination pattern and timetable. When routes are fixed, they fall in the category of jitneys (see further). When times are fixed but routes are variable, they fall under the denominator of vanpools. Some authors include pre-booking as an element of the definition (Xxxxxx 2013), which would then be the defining element compared to microtransit, which uses more technologically advanced booking options (see further). There are also ‘hybrid’ forms of DRT, combining a fixed route core allowing pre-booked deviations (up to a predefined maximum distance) and hail and ride on the fixed route section (Mulley et al. 2012). Potential target markets for DRT services are (Xxxxxxx et al. 2012, Xxxx et al. 2015; Xxxxx et al. 2015; Xxxxx et al. 2014):  Market segments where demand is too low for conventional buses (e.g. rural areas, night and weekends) or where greater flexibility is needed than what can be provided by 83 Personal e-mail correspondence between Xxxxxxx and the author. conventional buses. In these cases, DRT targets the general public, with schoolchildren as important subsegment.  The elderly and mobility impaired (including non-emergency patient transport services), and, more in general, those who can afford neither private cars nor taxis. In Europe, this would be the typical clientele of DRT in an urban context. It should be noted that some authors exclude services who limit themselves to particular groups of users from their definition of DRT – in other words, they require that the service be available for all (Xxxx et al. 2015; Xxxxxxx et al. 2014). DRT is close to, but distinct from, semi-flexible bus routes, which “include a reference (nominal) route that serves fixed regular bus stops; however, when there are requests from clients with limited mobility, one or more of the vehicles serving the route may diverge from this nominal path, pick up the clients from their origin and eventually drop them to a regular bus stop or to a special destination” (Dikas and Minis 2014). Note that, in this concept, the “regular” bus must be able to take on boa...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Demand Responsive Transit (DRT

  • DEMAND RESPONSE If Customer is enrolled in a demand response programme, Customer represents and warrants it has the intent and ability to generate and/or reduce electrical demand to achieve Accepted Capacity (as defined in the applicable Programme Rule Attachment attached to the applicable Order Form) when notified by Provider during demand response events. If Customer is enrolled in a demand response programme utilising on-site electric generation, Customer further represents and warrants that (i) it holds all licenses and/or permits that are required by applicable law for the proper participation in such demand response programme; and (ii) when responding to a demand response event, it will comply with, and be responsible for any violation of applicable law.

  • Final Meeting Benefits Questionnaire Provide all key assumptions used to estimate projected benefits, including targeted market sector (e.g., population and geographic location), projected market penetration, baseline and projected energy use and cost, operating conditions, and emission reduction calculations. Examples of information that may be requested in the questionnaires include:

  • Kick-off Meeting Benefits Questionnaire (2) Mid-term Benefits Questionnaire; and (3)

  • CAFA Notice Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1715, not later than ten (10) days after the Agreement is filed with the Court, the Settlement Administrator shall cause to be served upon the Attorneys General of each U.S. State in which Settlement Class members reside, the Attorney General of the United States, and other required government officials, notice of the proposed settlement as required by law, subject to Paragraph 5.1 below.

  • EPP query-­‐command RTT Refers to the RTT of the sequence of packets that includes the sending of a query command plus the reception of the EPP response for only one EPP query command. It does not include packets needed for the start or close of either the EPP or the TCP session. EPP query commands are those described in section 2.9.2 of EPP RFC 5730. If the RTT is 5-­‐times or more the corresponding SLR, the RTT will be considered undefined.

  • Why did I get this Notice This is a court-authorized notice of a proposed settlement in a class action lawsuit, XxXxxxx, et al. v. Veriff, Inc., No. 2021L001202, pending in the Circuit Court of DuPage County, Illinois before the Xxx. Xxxxx Xxxxxxx. The Settlement would resolve a lawsuit brought on behalf of persons who allege that Veriff, Inc., collected individuals’ biometrics in Illinois through its identity-verification technology without first providing the individuals with legally-required written disclosures and obtaining written consent. If you received notice of this Settlement, you have been identified as someone who, at some time between November 12, 2016 and [Preliminary Approval], had biometrics collected, captured, purchased, received through trade, possessed, retained or otherwise obtained while in Illinois by Veriff or its technology for the purposes of identity verification, and whose identity was verified. The Court has granted preliminary approval of the Settlement and has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for purposes of settlement only. This notice explains the nature of the class action lawsuit, the terms of the Settlement, and the legal rights and obligations of the Settlement Class Members. Please read the instructions and explanations below so that you can better understand your legal rights. WHAT IS THIS LAWSUIT ABOUT? The Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”), 740 ILCS 14/1, et seq., prohibits private companies from capturing, obtaining, storing, transmitting, and/or using the biometric identifiers and/or information, such as scans of face geometry, of another individual for any purpose without first providing them with certain written disclosures and obtaining written consent. This lawsuit alleges that Defendant violated BIPA by collecting or capturing the scans of face geometry of individuals through identity verification technology in Illinois without first providing the requisite disclosures or obtaining the consent required by BIPA. Defendant contests these claims, denies that it collected or possessed facial biometrics or any other information subject to BIPA, and denies that it violated BIPA. WHY IS THIS A CLASS ACTION? A class action is a lawsuit in which an individual called a “Class Representative” brings a single lawsuit on behalf of other people who have similar claims. All of these people together are a “Class” or “Class Members.” Once a Class is certified, a class action Settlement finally approved by the Court resolves the issues for all Settlement Class Members, except for those who exclude themselves from the Settlement Class. WHY IS THERE A SETTLEMENT? To resolve this matter without the expense, delay, and uncertainties of litigation, the Parties have reached a Settlement, which resolves all claims against Defendant and its affiliated entities. The Settlement requires Defendant to pay money to the Settlement Class, as well as pay settlement administration expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs to Class Counsel, and Incentive Awards to each of the Class Representatives, if approved by the Court. The Settlement is not an admission of wrongdoing by Defendant and does not imply that there has been, or would be, any finding that Defendant violated the law. The Court has already preliminarily approved the Settlement. Nevertheless, because the settlement of a class action determines the rights of all members of the class, the Court overseeing this lawsuit must give final approval to the Settlement before it can be effective. The Court has conditionally certified the Settlement Class for settlement purposes only, so that members of the Settlement Class can be given this notice and the opportunity to exclude themselves from the Settlement Class, to voice their support or opposition to final approval of the Settlement, and to submit a Claim Form to receive the relief offered by the Settlement. If the Court does not give final approval to the Settlement, or if it is terminated by the Parties, the Settlement will be void, and the lawsuit will proceed as if there had been no settlement and no certification of the Settlement Class.

  • Demand Letter If OIG determines that a basis for Stipulated Penalties under Section X.A exists, OIG shall notify Provider of: (a) Provider’s failure to comply and (b) OIG’s demand for payment of Stipulated Penalties. (This notification shall be referred to as the “Demand Letter.”)‌

  • Minute Clarification The parties mutually understand that the only obligation to continue the health benefits of active employees after the expiration of the Agreement is that which may arise from the general legal duty to bargain in good faith.

  • EPP command RTT Refers to “EPP session-­‐command RTT”, “EPP query-­‐command RTT” or “EPP transform-­‐command RTT”.

  • EPP transform-command RTT Refers to the RTT of the sequence of packets that includes the sending of a transform command plus the reception of the EPP response for only one EPP transform command. It does not include packets needed for the start or close of either the EPP or the TCP session. EPP transform commands are those described in section 2.9.3 of EPP RFC 5730. If the RTT is 5 times or more the corresponding SLR, the RTT will be considered undefined.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.