Examples of Duke Group in a sentence
Neither the Company nor the Operating Partnership owns any direct or indirect equity interest in any entity other than the subsidiaries and the Property Partnerships, except for such interests as, in the aggregate, are not material to the condition, financial or otherwise, or the earnings, assets, business affairs or business prospects of the Duke Group considered as a single enterprise.
There are no contracts or documents of the entities comprising the Duke Group which are required to be filed as exhibits to the Registration Statement by the 1933 Act or by the 1933 Act Regulations which have not been so filed.
No labor dispute with the employees of the Duke Group exists or, to the knowledge of the Company or the Operating Partnership, is imminent; and neither the Company nor the Operating Partnership is aware of any existing or imminent labor disturbance by the employees of any of its principal suppliers, manufacturers or contractors which might be expected to have a Material Adverse Effect.
None of the entities comprising the Duke Group is required to own or possess any trademarks, service marks, trade names or copyrights not now lawfully owned, possessed or licensed in order to conduct the business now operated by such entity, the absence of which would have a Material Adverse Effect.
None of the entities comprising the Duke Group is required to be registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”).
Rod Duke: Group Managing Director and Deputy ChairmanGroup Managing Director since 1991.
None of the entities comprising the Duke Group is required to own or possess any trademarks, service marks, trade names or copyrights not now lawfully owned, possessed or licensed in order to conduct the business now operated by such entity.
According to Perry J in Barker v Duke Group (in Liq) (2005) 91 SASR 167at [114]–[115], there are two steps to the limitation question where it arises in a pleaded defence to apply a limitation period by analogy to an equitable claim: Clearly, the court must first determine whether the similarity is such as to justify the application of the analogy.
The definition of Fletcher Moulton LJ in Re The Spanish Prospecting Company Ltd12 is often cited as a starting point, as in The Duke Group (in Liq) v Pilmer.13 The term is understood (however unhelpfully) to mean different things in different contexts.14 It is submitted ‘profit’ in the context of the Partnership Act is not so broad as to include tax benefit.) When the legislation is read with the second reading speech, it is clear Part IVA ought not be used against valid partnerships.
The cases often speak of fiduciary duties in general terms, such as “the central obligation of a fiduciary is to give his or her undivided loyalty to the person to whom the fiduciary duty is owed” ( Pilmer v Duke Group Ltd (In Liq) (2001) 207 CLR 165).