Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei Sample Clauses

Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei. A Report into Claims concerning New Zealand Law and Policy Affecting Māori Culture and Identity, Te Taumata Tuatahi (Wellington: Legislation Direct, 2011), p 188
Sample 1See All (4)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei. A Report into Claims concerning New Zealand Law and Policy Affecting Māori Culture and Identity, Te Taumata Tuarua, 2 vols (Wellington: Legislation Direct, 2011), vol 2, p 680 4. Xxxxx Xxxxxx, ‘Trade Numbers Show Promising Start to cptpp’, New Zealand Government press release, 12 March 2019, xxxxx://xxx.xxxxxxx.xxxx.xx/release/trade-numbers-show-promising- start-cptpp; ftA Implementation Unit, ‘Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxxx.xx/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade- agreements-concluded-but-not-in-force/regional-comprehensive-economic-partnership-rcep/rcep- overview, accessed 27 September 2021; Xxxxxx Xxxxxx, ‘rcep Forms the World’s Largest Trading Bloc: What does this Mean for Global Trade’, 9 December 2020, rANd Corporation, xxxxx://xxx. xxxx.xxx/xxxx/0000/00/xxxx-xxxxx-xxx-xxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx-xxxx-xxxx-xxxx.xxxx, accessed 27 September 2021; ‘Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership’, Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade, xxxxx://xxx.xxxx.xxxx.xx/en/trade/free-trade-agreements/free-trade- agreements-in-force/comprehensive-and-progressive-agreement-for-trans-pacific-partnership- cptpp/cptpp-overview, accessed 27 September 2021
Sample 1
Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei. A Report into Claims concerning New Zealand Law and Policy Affecting Māori Culture and Identity, Xx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, 0 vols (Wellington: Legislation Direct, 2011) 35. Submission 3.3.44, pp 6, 17; submission 3.3.47(a), pp 8, 46; submission 3.3.49, p 3 36. Submission 3.3.44, p 22 37. Submission 3.3.47(a), p 7 38. Ibid, p 49; submission 3.3.44, p 26 39. Submission 3.3.48, p 1 The Context for this Inquiry 1.5.3 However, the Crown argued that its process for engaging with Māori to develop a plant variety rights regime unique to New Zealand, consistent with its CPTPPA obligations, was Tiriti /Treaty compliant 40 The Crown submitted that it had carried out extensive engagement, consultation, and collaboration with Māori throughout the plant variety rights review It asserted that the outcomes of the review met, and exceeded, the relief originally sought by the claimants in this inquiry and that it had implemented the relevant Tribunal guidance as to what was necessary to meet Tiriti /Treaty obligations 41 The Crown highlighted that the plant variety rights legislation was only ‘one small element of the regulatory complex that impacts on Māori relationships with the natural world’ It argued that, in progressing with the plant variety rights regime, it was ‘reducing the extent to which it is not in full compliance with its Treaty obligations’, and in time it intended to bring the rest of the regulatory sys- tem ‘further into line with its Treaty obligations’ 42 The Crown also submitted that the specific elements of this unique plant variety rights regime were consistent with, and went beyond, the Tribunal’s recommenda- tions concerning plant variety rights in Ko Aotearoa Tēnei It said that Ko Aotearoa Tēnei placed both Māori and non-Māori interests in the centre and encouraged that a proportional balancing approach be taken under the principle of part- nership 43 The Crown submitted that, to a large extent, the claimants were really asking for the Tribunal to revisit the findings and recommendations made in Ko Aotearoa Tēnei 44 The Crown acknowledged the ‘holism of the Māori world view’ and accepted the interrelationships between matters considered in Ko Aotearoa Tēnei, but it argued that the stance the claimants were now taking – that all Ko Aotearoa Tēnei issues should be progressed collectively through Xx Xxx Tawhiti – was not prac- tical, reasonable, or workable 45
Sample 1
Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei. Te Taumata Tuarua, vol 1, p 15; see also Waitangi Tribunal, The Wananga Capital Establishment Report (Wellington: Legislation Direct, 1999), p 50
Sample 1

Related to Waitangi Tribunal, Ko Aotearoa Tēnei

  • International Olympic Committee; International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement As instructed from time to time by ICANN, the names (including their IDN variants, where applicable) relating to the International Olympic Committee, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement listed at xxxx://xxx.xxxxx.xxx/en/resources/registries/reserved shall be withheld from registration or allocated to Registry Operator at the second level within the TLD. Additional International Olympic Committee, International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement names (including their IDN variants) may be added to the list upon ten (10) calendar days notice from ICANN to Registry Operator. Such names may not be activated in the DNS, and may not be released for registration to any person or entity other than Registry Operator. Upon conclusion of Registry Operator’s designation as operator of the registry for the TLD, all such names withheld from registration or allocated to Registry Operator shall be transferred as specified by ICANN. Registry Operator may self-­‐allocate and renew such names without use of an ICANN accredited registrar, which will not be considered Transactions for purposes of Section 6.1 of the Agreement.

  • JOINT LABOUR MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE 18.01 A Joint Labour Management Committee shall be established to attend to those matters which are of mutual interest. To ensure its effectiveness the Committee shall be separate and apart from the grievance procedure.

  • Mitsui Iron Ore Corporation Pty Ltd. to vary the Iron Ore (Marillana Creek) Agreement;

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting the HUB Program at 000-000-0000 or toll-free in Texas at 0-000-000-0000.

  • Mobile Banking Transactions At the present time, you may use Mobile Banking to: • Transfer funds between your savings, checking, and Club accounts. • Make loan payments from your savings, checking, and Club accounts. • Obtain account balance and transaction history on your savings, checking, and Club accounts. • Obtain information on your loan account balance, transaction history, payment due dates, loan payoff amounts and finance charges. • Make xxxx payments from your savings or checking account using the Mobile Xxxx Xxxxx service . When you register for Mobile Banking, designated accounts and payees (or billers) linked to your account through Online Banking will be accessible through the Mobile Banking service.

  • Labour Management Committee (a) Where the parties mutually agree that there are matters of mutual concern and interest that would be beneficial if discussed at a Labour-Management Committee Meeting during the term of this Agreement, the following shall apply.

  • Joint Union/Management Committee It shall be appropriate for either the Union or the University to request that a Joint Union/Management committee be convened, with Environmental Health and Safety as a participating member, to discuss health and safety concerns and to explore options for addressing those concerns through appropriate training or other approaches.

  • Joint Steering Committee [***] following the Effective Date [***], a joint steering committee (the “JSC”) will be established by the Parties to provide oversight and to facilitate information sharing between the Parties with respect to the activities under this Agreement.

  • Project Team Cooperation Partnering 1.1.3 Constitutional Principles Applicable to State Public Works Projects.

  • EMPLOYEE-MANAGEMENT ADVISORY COMMITTEE 33.01 (a) An Employee-Management Advisory Committee (EMAC) shall be established within three (3) months of the signing of the Collective Agreement. The Union Representative shall provide the names of up to three (3) elected Employees and the Employer shall provide the names of up to three (3) appointed representatives to sit on the EMAC.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.