Unaccusatives vs Sample Clauses

Unaccusatives vs unergatives Finally, note that the intransitives above are all unaccusatives. An immediate question arises about the behavior of unergative subjects, which under this analysis might be predicted to trigger ergative agreement. Ch’ol is not revealing in this respect, as unergative stems are all formally nominal; in order to predicate they must appear together with a light verb, such as the transitive cha’l ‘do’ in (61a); see Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx 2004. Xxxx (2013) argues that unergative nouns like soñ do not directly project any theta-roles. That is, these are not nominalizations, but simply event-denoting nouns. As such, the absence of person morphology on forms like (61b) is unsurprising, as there is no controlled PRO.18 17I am grateful to two anonymous reviewers for comments on this point. 18While the control reading is most natural, some speakers report that, in the right context, the sentence in (61b) could interpreted as the speaker wanting dancing in general. This is thus not a relation of syntactic control, but may instead be reduced to pragmatic factors.‌
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Unaccusatives vs

  • Allegations 1. The Drug Price Competition and Patent Term Restoration Act of 1984, commonly known as the Xxxxx-Xxxxxx Act ("Xxxxx-Xxxxxx"), created the regulatory mechanism under which the United States Food and Drug Administration can approve generic pharmaceuticals. In 2015, sales of generic pharmaceuticals in the United States were estimated at $74.5 billion dollars. Today, the generic pharmaceutical industry accounts for approximately 88% of all prescriptions written in the United States.

  • Customer Complaints Each party hereby agrees to promptly provide to the other party copies of any written or otherwise documented complaints from customers of Dealer received by such party relating in any way to the Offering (including, but not limited to, the manner in which the Shares are offered by the Dealer Manager or Dealer), the Shares or the Company.

  • Program Fraud and False or Fraudulent Statements or Related Acts (A) The CONTRACTOR acknowledges that the provisions of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986, as amended, 31 U.S.C. § 3801 et seq . and U.S. DOT regulations, "Program Fraud Civil Remedies," 49 C.F.R. Part 31, apply to its actions pertaining to this Project. Upon execution of the underlying contract, the CONTRACTOR certifies or affirms the truthfulness and accuracy of any statement it has made, it makes, it may make, or causes to be made, pertaining to the underlying contract or the FTA assisted project for which this contract work is being performed. In addition to other penalties that may be applicable, the CONTRACTOR further acknowledges that if it makes, or causes to be made, a false, fictitious, or fraudulent claim, statement, submission, or certification, the Federal Government reserves the right to impose the penalties of the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1986 on the CONTRACTOR to the extent the Federal Government deems appropriate.

  • Complaints If you have a complaint relating to the sale of energy by us to you, or this contract generally, you may lodge a complaint with us in accordance with our standard complaints and dispute resolution procedures. Note: Our standard complaints and dispute resolution procedures are published on our website.

  • Causes The contract may be terminated before the stated completion date by any of the following conditions.

  • Payment in the Event Losses Fail to Reach Expected Level On the date that is 45 days following the last day (such day, the “True-Up Measurement Date”) of the Final Shared Loss Month, or upon the final disposition of all Shared Loss Assets under this Single Family Shared-Loss Agreement at any time after the termination of the Commercial Shared-Loss Agreement, the Assuming Institution shall pay to the Receiver fifty percent (50%) of the excess, if any, of (i) twenty percent (20%) of the Intrinsic Loss Estimate less (ii) the sum of (A) twenty-five percent (25%) of the asset premium (discount) plus (B) twenty-five percent (25%) of the Cumulative Shared-Loss Payments plus (C) the Cumulative Servicing Amount. The Assuming Institution shall deliver to the Receiver not later than 30 days following the True-Up Measurement Date, a schedule, signed by an officer of the Assuming Institution, setting forth in reasonable detail the calculation of the Cumulative Shared-Loss Payments and the Cumulative Servicing Amount.

  • Released Parties The term “Released Parties,” as used in this Release, shall mean the Company Group and any of its past or present employees, administrators, agents, officials, officers, directors, shareholders, divisions, parents, subsidiaries, successors, affiliates, general partners, limited partners, consultants, employee benefit plans (and their sponsors, fiduciaries, or administrators), insurers, accountants and attorneys.

  • Liability to Third Parties The Member shall not be liable for the debts, obligations or liabilities of the Company, including under a judgment, decree or order of a court.

  • Fraud Any suspicion of fraud, waste, or abuse involving the contracting or certification of MWBEs shall be immediately reported to ESD’s Division of Minority and Women’s Business Development at (000) 000-0000. ALL FORMS ARE AVAILABLE AT: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/MWBE/Forms.asp

  • Non-Third Party Claims Upon discovery of any claim for which Buyer has an indemnification obligation under the terms of Section 12.1 which does not involve a claim by a third party against the Indemnitee, the Indemnitee shall give prompt notice to Buyer of such claim and, in any case, shall give Buyer such notice within 30 days of such discovery. A failure by Indemnitee to timely give the foregoing notice to Buyer shall not excuse Buyer from any indemnification liability except to the extent that Buyer is materially and adversely prejudiced by such failure.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.