TREATIES IN FORCE Sample Clauses

TREATIES IN FORCE. BOLIVIA (Cont’d) Agreement regarding the reduction and reorga- nization of certain debts owed to, guaranteed by, or insured by the United States Govern- ment and its agencies. Signed at La Paz No- vember 27, 1996; entered into force April 7, 1997. NP Agreement regarding the reduction and reorga- nization of certain debts owed to, guaranteed by, or insured by the United States Govern- ment and its agencies, with annexes. Signed at Santa Cruz December 2, 1999; entered into force February 23, 2000. NP INFORMATIONAL MEDIA GUARANTIES Agreement providing for an informational media guaranty program. Exchange of notes at La Paz February 27 and March 10, 1956; en- tered into force March 10, 1956. 7 UST 440; TIAS 3528; 270 UNTS 199.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
TREATIES IN FORCE. The administration has informed the committee that there have been no major problems involving a U.S. investment, with the exception of Zaire, in countries with which bilateral investment treaties are in force. They have also stated there have been no cases in which the bilateral investment treaty dispute settlement mechanism for international arbitration has been invoked. Our experience to date with the United States bilateral investment treaties in force is that they are a valuable tool, both for the United States investor and the United States government, to insure that our bilateral investment treaty partners protect United States investment. In two cases (Panama and Zaire), the United States government has been notified by the United States investors of potential bilateral investment treaty violations, and in both cases the United States Embassy in the host country made demarches to the host government. In one case, the host government stopped the offending practice and in the other Zaire -discussed infra) consultations are continuing.*** Recently disputes have arisen between United States companies and the Government of Zaire regarding the taking of petroleum product installations, and compensation for the destruction of property during the civil disturbances of September and October 1991. The United States has informed the Government of Zaire that we expect Zaire to fulfill its obligations under the bilateral investment treaty with respect to both these problems, and to return the petroleum installations to their United States owners. We have also advised the United States companies involved of their rights under the bilateral investment treaty. If negotiated settlement cannot be reached after six months, they have the right directly to seek remedy in the courts of Zaire or through international arbitration. We will continue to remain fully engaged with the Government of Zaire in seeking resolution of these issues. (Answer to questions submitted by Chairman Pell to the administration.) The administration has indicated that in a number of the countries with BITs in effect, U.S. investment has increased since the BIT went into force. However, the administration has pointed out that the existence of a BIT will not guarantee increased U.S. investment. Because investment decisions are based on a variety of factors and the BITs have only been in force for a short period of time, the administration says it would be difficult to draw a relationship between ...
Sample 1
TREATIES IN FORCE. CANADA (Cont’d) Agreement relating to the leased naval base at Argentia, Newfoundland. Exchange of notes at London August 13 and October 23, 1947; en- tered into force October 23, 1947. 61 Stat. 4065; TIAS 1809; 12 Bevans 827; 66 UNTS 277. Amendment: May 22, 1985. Agreement establishing a Joint Industrial Mo- bilization Committee. Exchange of notes at Ot- tawa April 12, 1949; entered into force April 12, 1949. 63 Stat. 2331; TIAS 1889; 6 Bevans 486; 206 UNTS 241. Agreement relating to a final settlement for all war surplus property disposed of pursuant to the agreements effected by exchanges of notes of November 22 and December 20, 1944; March 30, 1946; and July 11 and 15, 1946. Exchange of notes at Ottawa June 17 and 18, 1949; entered into force June 18, 1949. 2 UST 2272; TIAS 2352; 200 UNTS 258. Agreement relating to economic cooperation for defense. Exchange of notes at Washington October 26, 1950; entered into force October 26, 1950. 1 UST 716; TIAS 2136; 132 UNTS 247. Agreement relating to the extension and co- ordination of the continental radar defense sys- tem.1 Exchange of notes at Washington August 1, 1951; entered into force August 1, 1951.
Sample 1
TREATIES IN FORCE. CHINA 1 (Cont’d) Hong Kong will, with effect from that date, become a Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China. It is provided in Section I of Annex I to the Joint Declaration, ‘‘Elaboration by the Govern- ment of the People’s Republic of China of its Basic Policies Regarding Hong Kong’’, and in Articles 12, 13 and 14 of the Basic Law of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China, which was adopted on 4 April 1990 by the National Peo- ple’s Congress of the People’s Republic of China (hereinafter referred to as the Basic law), that the Hong Kong Special Administra- tive Region will enjoy a high degree of auton- omy, except in foreign and defence affairs which are the responsibility of the Central Peo- ple’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Furthermore, it is provided both in Sec- tion XI of Annex I to the Joint Declaration and Article 153 of the Basic Law that international agreements to which the People’s Republic of China is not a party but which are imple- mented in Hong Kong may continue to be im- plemented in the Hong Kong Special Adminis- trative Region. In this connection, on behalf of the Govern- ment of the People’s Republic of China, I would like to inform Your Excellency as fol- lows:
Sample 1
TREATIES IN FORCE. ECUADOR AGRICULTURAL COMMODITIES Agricultural commodities agreement with memorandum of understanding and exchange of notes. Signed at Quito September 27, 1960; entered into force September 27, 1960. 11 UST 2427; TIAS 4626; 401 UNTS 115. Agricultural commodities agreement with ex- changes of notes. Signed at Quito April 3, 1961; entered into force April 3, 1961. 12 UST 671; TIAS 4768; 409 UNTS 139. Agricultural commodities agreement with ex- change of notes. Signed at Quito April 5, 1963; entered into force April 5, 1963. 14 UST 775; TIAS 5356; 477 UNTS 135. Amendment: October 6, 1964 (15 UST 1967; TIAS 5673; 531 UNTS 400). Agricultural commodities agreement, with ex- change of notes. Signed at Quito June 25, 1965; entered into force June 25, 1965. 16 UST 960; TIAS 5835; 549 UNTS 23. Amendment: October 24, 1966 (17 UST 2275; TIAS 6168; 680 UNTS 400). Agricultural commodities agreement. Signed at Quito June 30, 1969; entered into force June 30, 1969. 21 UST 1107; TIAS 6867; 745 UNTS 90.
Sample 1

Related to TREATIES IN FORCE

  • Summary of Policy and Prohibitions on Procurement Lobbying Pursuant to State Finance Law §139-j and §139-k, this Contract includes and imposes certain restrictions on communications between OGS and a Vendor during the procurement process. A Vendor is restricted from making contacts from the earliest notice of intent to solicit offers/bids through final award and approval of the Procurement Contract by OGS and, if applicable, the Office of the State Comptroller (“restricted period”) to other than designated staff unless it is a contact that is included among certain statutory exceptions set forth in State Finance Law §139-j(3)(a). Designated staff, as of the date hereof, is identified in Appendix G, Contractor and OGS Information, or as otherwise indicated by OGS. OGS employees are also required to obtain certain information when contacted during the restricted period and make a determination of the responsibility of the Vendor pursuant to these two statutes. Certain findings of non-responsibility can result in rejection for contract award and in the event of two findings within a four-year period; the Vendor is debarred from obtaining governmental Procurement Contracts. Further information about these requirements can be found on the OGS website: xxxx://xxx.xxx.xx.xxx/aboutOgs/regulations/defaultSFL_139j-k.asp.

  • Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 Subrecipient hereby acknowledges and agrees that it must comply with the requirements of the government-wide award term which implements Section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) of 2000, as amended (22 U.S.C. 7104). The award term is located at 2 C.F.R. Part 175.15, the full text of which is incorporated here by reference.

  • Changes to Privacy Policy Agreement The Tintstitute reserves the right to update and/or change the terms of our privacy policy, and as such we will post those change to our website homepage at xxxx://xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx.xxx, so that our users and/or visitors are always aware of the type of information we collect, how it will be used, and under what circumstances, if any, we may disclose such information. If at any point in time The Tintstitute decides to make use of any personally identifiable information on file, in a manner vastly different from that which was stated when this information was initially collected, the user or users shall be promptly notified by email. Users at that time shall have the option as to whether or not to permit the use of their information in this separate manner.

  • Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act The Charter School is subject to all provisions of the Federal Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1232g. In the event the Charter School closes, it shall transmit all official student records in the manner prescribed by the State Board.

  • DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY 14.1 In addition to Supplier’s obligations under Sections 6, 9, 10, and 15, Supplier will comply with this Section 14 when processing Accenture Personal Data. "

  • CONFIDENTIALITY AND PRIVACY POLICIES AND LAWS The Contractor shall comply to the extent applicable with all State and Authorized User policies regarding compliance with various confidentiality and privacy laws, rules and regulations, including but not limited to the IRS Publication 1075, Family Educational Rights and Privacy Act (FERPA), the Health Insurance and Portability Act of 1996 (HIPAA) and the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH). Contractor shall cooperate in executing a written confidentiality agreement under FERPA and/or a Business Associate Agreement (HIPAA/HITECH) or other contractual provisions upon request by the State or any Authorized User.

  • Security Policy for Contractors 1. The Department for Work and Pensions treats its information as a valuable asset and considers that it is essential that information must be protected, together with the systems, equipment and processes which support its use. These information assets may include data, text, drawings, diagrams, images or sounds in electronic, magnetic, optical or tangible media, together with any Personal Data for which the Department for Work and Pensions is the Data Controller.

  • SAFETY PRECAUTIONS AND PROGRAMS The Contractor shall be responsible for initiating, maintaining and supervising all safety precautions and programs in connection with the Work.

  • Information Technology Accessibility Standards Any information technology related products or services purchased, used or maintained through this Grant must be compatible with the principles and goals contained in the Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards adopted by the Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board under Section 508 of the federal Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (29 U.S.C. §794d), as amended. The federal Electronic and Information Technology Accessibility Standards can be found at: xxxx://xxx.xxxxxx-xxxxx.xxx/508.htm.

  • Data Protection and Confidentiality 3.1. We obtain, use, process and disclose personal data about you and data subjects (as defined in the DPA) in order that we may provide the Services and for other related purposes including updating and enhancing client records, analysis for management purposes and statutory returns, crime prevention and legal and regulatory compliance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.