Theoretical Analysis Sample Clauses

Theoretical Analysis. We initially look at the online unpredictability that is basic for the reasonableness of a ConBE conspires. While assessing the execution, we utilize the generally embraced measurements for customary BE plans. In these measurements, the expenses of straightforward tasks (e.g., read the files of recipients and play out some basic evaluation of group components related to these lists) and correspondence (e.g., the paired portrayal of the collectors' set) are not thought about. After the CBSetup technique, a sender needs to recover and store the group open key PK comprising of n components in G and n components in GT. In addition, for encryption, the sender needs just two exponentiations and the ciphertext simply contains two components in G. This is about n times more effective than the paltry arrangement. At the collector's side, notwithstanding the depiction of the bilinear combine which might be shared by numerous other security applications, a recipient needs to store n components in G for decoding. For decoding, a recipient needs to figure two single-base bilinear pairings (or one two base bilinear matching). The online expenses on the sides of both the sender and the collectors are extremely low. We next talk about the unpredictability of the CBSetup methodology to set up a ConBE framework. The overhead caused by this technique is O (n2). This method should be run just once and this should be possible disconnected before the online transmission of mystery session keys. For example, in the interpersonal organizations case, various companions trade their CBSetup transcripts and build up a ConBE framework to anchor their resulting sharing of private picture/videos. Since ConBE permits renouncing persons, the persons don't have to reassemble for another kept running of the CBSetup technique until the point when some new companions join. From our own understanding, the group lifetime for the most part keeps going from weeks to months. These perceptions infer that our convention is commonsense in reality. Besides, if the underlying group is too extensive, an effective exchange off can be utilized to adjust the on the web and disconnected expenses. Assume that n is a shape, i.e., n = n1 3, and the underlying group has n individuals. We separate the full group into n1 2 subgroups, every one of which has n1 individuals. By applying our essential ConBE to every subgroup, we get a ConBE plot with O (n 2)- measure transcripts per part amid the disconnected phase o...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Theoretical Analysis. The primary focus of the theoretical effort will be upon Monte Carlo (MC) calculations aimed at gaining a detailed understanding of the role of chromophore (and dendrimer) shape upon ordering under the influence of an electric xxxxxx field. Simulations will be run using a to-be- acquired high-speed computer. Calculations will be carried out as functions of chromophore number density, chromophore shape and electronic structure (dipole moment, polarizability, etc.) of the chromophores. The Principal Investigator believes that a particular advantage of MC methods is the opportunity for visualization of transient ordered states. One result of MC calculations appears to be the confirmation of the fundamental correctness of the Xxxxxxx picture of ordering due to long-range, spatially-anisotropic dipole-dipole interactions. MC methods appear to be appropriate for all concentration domains (from dilute solutions of chromophores to neat chromophore materials) and the pictures of transiently ordered phases may be useful in understanding light scattering as a function of chromophore concentration and also for understanding the results of pulsed xxxxxx experiments. Such subtle physical insight may prove a useful guide for the further modification of chromophore shape and electronic properties and for optimizing the protocols for inducing acentric chromophore order.
Theoretical Analysis. We first examine the online complexity that is critical for the practicality of a ConBE scheme. When evaluating the performance, we use the widely adopted metrics for regular BE schemes. In these metrics, the costs of simple operations (e.g., read the indices of receivers and perform some simple quantification of group elements associated to these indices) and communication (e.g., the binary representation of the receivers’ set) are not taken into consideration. After the CBSetup procedure, a sender needs to retrieve and store the group public key PK consisting of n elements in G and n elements in GT. Moreover, for encryption, the sender needs only two exponentiations and the ciphertext merely contains two elements in G. This is about n times more efficient than the trivial solution. At the receiver’s side, in addition to the description of the bilinear pair which may be shared by many other security applications, a receiver needs to store n elements in G for decryption. For decryption, a receiver needs to compute two single-base bilinear pairings (or one double base bilinear pairing). The online costs on the sides of both the sender and the receivers are really low. We next discuss the complexity of the CBSetup procedure to set up a ConBE system. The overhead incurred by this procedure is O (n2). This procedure needs to be run only once and this can be done offline before the online transmission of secret session keys. For instance, in the social networks example, a number of friends exchange Xxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, X. Xxxx Xxxxxxx, X. Xxxxxxx n 1 their CBSetup transcripts and establish a ConBE system to initial group has n members. We divide the full group into secure their subsequent sharing of private picture/videos.

Related to Theoretical Analysis

  • Risk Analysis The Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to Securities Depositories operating in the countries listed in Appendix B. If the Custodian is unable to provide a Risk Analysis with respect to a particular Securities Depository, it will notify the Fund. If a new Securities Depository commences operation in one of the Appendix B countries, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis in a reasonably practicable time after such Securities Depository becomes operational. If a new country is added to Appendix B, the Custodian will provide the Fund with a Risk Analysis with respect to each Securities Depository in that country within a reasonably practicable time after the addition of the country to Appendix B.

  • Quantitative Analysis Quantitative analysts develop and apply financial models designed to enable equity portfolio managers and fundamental analysts to screen potential and current investments, assess relative risk and enhance performance relative to benchmarks and peers. To the extent that such services are to be provided with respect to any Account which is a registered investment company, Categories 3, 4 and 5 above shall be treated as “investment advisory services” for purposes of Section 5(b) of the Agreement.”

  • Escrow Analysis If applicable, with respect to each Mortgage Loan, the Seller has within the last twelve months (unless such Mortgage was originated within such twelve month period) analyzed the required Escrow Payments for each Mortgage and adjusted the amount of such payments so that, assuming all required payments are timely made, any deficiency will be eliminated on or before the first anniversary of such analysis, or any overage will be refunded to the Mortgagor, in accordance with RESPA and any other applicable law;

  • Sampling and Analysis The sampling and analysis of the coal shall be performed by Seller upon loading of the coal, and the results thereof shall be accepted and used as defining the quality and characteristics of the coal under this Agreement and as the Payment Analysis. All analyses shall be made in Seller’s laboratory at Seller’s expense in accordance with ASTM standards where applicable, or industry-accepted standards in other cases. Samples for analyses shall be taken in accordance with ASTM standards or other methods mutually acceptable to both parties. Seller shall transmit its quality analysis to Buyer as soon as possible. Each sample taken by Seller shall be divided into four (4) parts and put into airtight containers, properly labeled and sealed. One (1) part shall be used for analysis by Seller. One (1) part shall be used by Seller as a check sample, if Seller in its sole judgment determines it is necessary. One (1) part shall be retained by Seller until thirty (30) days after the sample is taken (“Disposal Date”), and shall be delivered to Buyer for analysis if Buyer so requests before the Disposal Date. One (1) part (the “Referee Sample”) shall be retained by Seller until the Disposal Date. Buyer, on reasonable notice to Seller, shall have the right to have a representative present to observe the sampling and analyses performed by Seller. Unless Buyer requests an analysis of the Referee Sample before the Disposal Date, Seller’s analysis shall be used to determine the quality of the coal under this Agreement and shall be the Payment Analysis. The Monthly Weighted Averages of specifications referenced in §6.1 shall be based on the individual Shipment analyses. If any dispute arises with regard to the analysis of any sample before the Disposal Date for such sample, the Referee Sample retained by Seller shall be submitted for analysis to an independent commercial testing laboratory (“Independent Lab”) mutually chosen by Buyer and Seller. For each coal quality specification in question, if the analysis of the Independent Lab differs by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards, the Independent Lab results will govern, and the prior analysis shall be disregarded. All testing of the Referee Sample by the Independent Lab shall be at requestor’s expense unless the Independent Lab results differ from the original Payment Analysis for any specification by more than the applicable ASTM reproducibility standards as to that specification. In such case, the cost of the analysis made by the Independent Lab shall be borne by the party who provided the original Payment Analysis.

  • Independent Analysis Each Party hereby confirms that its decision to execute this Agreement has been based upon its independent assessment of documents and information available to it, as it has deemed appropriate.

  • Tests and Preclinical and Clinical Trials The studies, tests and preclinical and clinical trials conducted by or, to the Company’s knowledge, on behalf of the Company were and, if still ongoing, are being conducted in all material respects in accordance with experimental protocols, procedures and controls pursuant to accepted professional scientific standards and all Authorizations and Applicable Laws, including, without limitation, the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the rules and regulations promulgated thereunder (collectively, “FFDCA”); the descriptions of the results of such studies, tests and trials contained in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus are, to the Company’s knowledge, accurate in all material respects and fairly present the data derived from such studies, tests and trials; except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus, the Company is not aware of any studies, tests or trials, the results of which the Company believes reasonably call into question the study, test, or trial results described or referred to in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package and the Prospectus when viewed in the context in which such results are described and the clinical state of development; and, except to the extent disclosed in the Registration Statement, the General Disclosure Package or the Prospectus, neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received any notices or correspondence from the FDA or any Governmental Entity requiring the termination or suspension of any studies, tests or preclinical or clinical trials conducted by or on behalf of the Company, other than ordinary course communications with respect to modifications in connection with the design and implementation of such trials, copies of which communications have been made available to you.

  • Research Analyst Independence The Company acknowledges that the Underwriters’ research analysts and research departments are required to be independent from their respective investment banking divisions and are subject to certain regulations and internal policies, and that such Underwriters’ research analysts may hold views and make statements or investment recommendations and/or publish research reports with respect to the Company and/or the offering that differ from the views of their respective investment banking divisions. The Company hereby waives and releases, to the fullest extent permitted by law, any claims that the Company may have against the Underwriters with respect to any conflict of interest that may arise from the fact that the views expressed by their independent research analysts and research departments may be different from or inconsistent with the views or advice communicated to the Company by such Underwriters’ investment banking divisions. The Company acknowledges that each of the Underwriters is a full service securities firm and as such from time to time, subject to applicable securities laws, may effect transactions for its own account or the account of its customers and hold long or short positions in debt or equity securities of the companies that may be the subject of the transactions contemplated by this Agreement.

  • Stability 14.01 Maintain a documented, ongoing stability program to monitor the stability of the Product using stability indicating procedures. X 14.02 Data analysis and trending reporting will be performed. X

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.