Task 3 – Jurisdictional Scan Sample Clauses

Task 3 – Jurisdictional Scan. In 2010, Intrinsik completed a “Systematic Literature Review of Health Outcomes Associated with Living in Proximity to Petrochemical Industries” for the Lambton Community Health Study Board, chaired by the local Medical Officer of Health. This was a very comprehensive review of the issue, which was undertaken with a significant budget. Given the timeline and budget considerations, the fundamentals of the approach used for the aforementioned review will be applied to this task of the Phase 2 project (Figure 1). The same information specialist/medical librarian will design a systematic search approach according to the Cochrane Guidelines for conducting systematic reviews for retrieval of the peer-reviewed literature. The rapid review will be modelled after the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (Cochrane Collaboration, 2008). Cochrane reviews adhere to the principle that “science is cumulative” and by considering the available evidence, decisions can be made that reflect the best science available. Rapid screening of the bibliographic database results will be undertaken to identify pertinent health outcome literature. The Intrinsik Team will concurrently retrieve relevant jurisdiction reports on health concerns in living in proximity to oil and gas activities. There has been a considerable amount of effort and funds spent in Alberta on this topic. In addition, there are a number of case reports and regulatory documents completed by the USEPA on topics such as hydraulic fracturing for extraction of unconventional shale gas. This review will also include documents prepared by the local Northern BC Medical Health Officers (MHOs), such as “Population Health and Oil and Gas Activities: A
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Task 3 – Jurisdictional Scan

  • WORK JURISDICTION Par. 1. It is agreed by the parties to this Agreement that all work specified in Article IV shall be performed exclusively by Elevator Constructor Mechanics, Elevator Constructor Helpers, Elevator Constructor Apprentices and Elevator Constructor Assistant Mechanics in the employ of the Company.

  • REGULATORY JURISDICTION Subject to Section 19.01, nothing in this Agreement shall restrict the rights of the Parties to file a complaint with or submit any action to the Commission or any other appropriate regulatory authority under relevant provisions of the Federal Power Act or other relevant statutory provisions, nor shall anything in this Agreement affect the jurisdiction of the Commission or any other regulatory authority over matters arising under this Agreement.

  • 000 JURISDICTION 8.100 Project maintenance conditions do not always justify adherence to craft lines which, in itself, does not establish precedent or change the appropriate jurisdiction of the crafts involved. Composite crews may be formed where conditions warrant, but this is not to be construed under regular operating conditions as the Company's prerogative to assign men out of their usual skill classification.

  • Non-Jurisdictional Entities LIPA and NYPA do not waive their exemptions, pursuant to Section 201(f) of the FPA, from Commission jurisdiction with respect to the Commission’s exercise of the FPA’s general ratemaking authority.

  • FEDERAL JURISDICTIONAL AREAS 33.1. Article 1, § 8, Clause 17 of the United States Constitution provides the authority to Congress to exercise exclusive jurisdiction over areas and structures used for military purposes (Federal Enclaves). Thus, Telecommunications Services to such Federal Enclaves are not subject to the jurisdiction of the Commission. The Parties agree that Services provided within Federal Enclaves are not within the scope of this Agreement. To the extent Sprint has contracts with federal entities that limit or prohibit the ability of CLEC to provide resale or UNEs such contract will govern Telecommunications Services on such Federal Enclave. If the contract with the federal entity provides for the resale or provision of UNEs to provide service on the Federal Enclave, Sprint will provide CLEC with the information regarding the provision of service on the Federal Enclave.

  • Tax Status Non Jurisdictional Entities Tax Status.‌‌ Each Party shall cooperate with the other Parties to maintain the other Parties’ tax status. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to adversely affect the tax status of any Party including the status of NYISO, or the status of any Connecting Transmission Owner with respect to the issuance of bonds including, but not limited to, Local Furnishing Bonds. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Agreement, LIPA, NYPA and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc. shall not be required to comply with any provisions of this Agreement that would result in the loss of tax-exempt status of any of their Tax-Exempt Bonds or impair their ability to issue future tax-exempt obligations. For purposes of this provision, Tax-Exempt Bonds shall include the obligations of the Long Island Power Authority, NYPA and Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., the interest on which is not included in gross income under the Internal Revenue Code. Non-Jurisdictional Entities. LIPA and NYPA do not waive their exemptions, pursuant to Section 201(f) of the FPA, from Commission jurisdiction with respect to the Commission’s exercise of the FPA’s general ratemaking authority.

  • Consistency in the Application of FATCA to Partner Jurisdictions 1. The Bahamas shall be granted the benefit of any more favorable terms under Article 4 or Annex I of this Agreement relating to the application of FATCA to Bahamas Financial Institutions afforded to another Partner Jurisdiction under a signed bilateral agreement pursuant to which the other Partner Jurisdiction commits to undertake the same obligations as The Bahamas described in Articles 2 and 3 of this Agreement, and subject to the same terms and conditions as described therein and in Articles 5, 6, 7, 10 and 11 of this Agreement.

  • Applicable Law; Jurisdiction This Agreement shall be governed by and interpreted in accordance with the laws of the State of New Jersey without regard to the principles of conflict of laws. The parties further agree that any action between them shall be heard in Xxxxxx County, New Jersey, and expressly consent to the jurisdiction and venue of the Superior Court of New Jersey, sitting in Xxxxxx County and the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey sitting in Newark, New Jersey for the adjudication of any civil action asserted pursuant to this Paragraph.

  • APPLICABLE LAW, FORUM, VENUE AND JURISDICTION (a) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

  • JURISDICTION OF WORK 2.1 The assignment of work of the sprinkler fitter and apprentice shall consist of the installation, maintenance, repair, servicing, inspection, backflow installation, and caulking of sleeves of fire suppression systems, including but not limited to sprinkler, halon, foam, clean agent, CO2 and dry chemical systems, including the unloading, handling, and installation by hand or with power equipment, of all piping or tubing, appurtenances or equipment pertaining thereto, including both overhead and underground water mains, fire hydrants and hydrant mains, standpipes and hose connections to sprinkler supply mains, sprinkler tank heaters, air lines associated with thermal sensing systems used in connection with sprinkler and alarm systems, also all tanks and pumps connected thereto, and other fixed systems used for fire protection purposes. This assignment of work shall also include the erection and dismantling of steel scaffolding, the operation and use of power operated scaffolding, the handling and use of swing stages, and all scaffolding a sprinkler fitter or their apprentice may use in the performance of their job.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.