Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case Sample Clauses

Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case. 20 Google has denied, and continues to deny, each and all claims of wrongdoing against it and 21 continues to assert defenses thereto, and has expressly denied any wrongdoing or legal liability out of 22 any of the conduct alleged in the Action. Google denies that Representative Plaintiffs or the Class 23 have suffered any damages or are entitled to any restitution. Representative Plaintiffs considered that 24 there was a substantial risk that they and the Class might not have prevailed on their claims and that 25 there were risks that they and the Class could have recovered substantially less than the settlement 26 amount, if the case had been litigated to judgment.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case. The parties do not agree on whether Plaintiffs would have prevailed on any of their claims against the Settling Defendants. They also do not agree on the average amount of damages per share, if any, that would be recoverable if the Class prevailed on the claims alleged. The Settling Defendants deny that they have engaged in any wrongdoing as alleged by Plaintiffs, deny any liability whatsoever for any of the claims alleged by Plaintiffs, and deny that the Class has suffered any injuries or damages. The Settling Defendants also have denied and continue to deny, among other allegations, that the price of XxxxXxxxx common stock was artificially inflated by reason of alleged misrepresentations, non-disclosures, or otherwise. The Settling Defendants maintain that they have meritorious defenses to all claims alleged in the Litigation.
Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case. Lead Plaintiff and Defendants do not agree on whether Lead Plaintiff would have prevailed on the claims against Defendants. Nor do they agree on the average amount of damages per UMC ADS that might be recoverable if Lead Plaintiff were to prevail on the claims. The Court has not reached any final decisions in connection with Lead Plaintiff’s claims against the Defendants. Instead, Lead Plaintiff and the Defendants (collectively, the “Settling Parties”) have agreed to this Settlement, which was reached after extensive arm’s-length negotiations. The parties do not agree on the average amount of damages per share, if any, that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiff was to prevail. The issues on which the Settling Parties disagree include, but are not limited to: (1) whether the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were false, material, or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; (2) whether any of the allegedly false or misleading statements were made knowingly or recklessly; (3) the extent to which the various matters that Lead Plaintiff alleged were materially false or misleading influenced (if at all) the trading price of UMC ADSs at various times during the Class Period; (4) the extent to which external factors, such as general market conditions, influenced the trading price of UMC ADSs at various times during the Class Period; (5) the appropriate economic model for determining the amount by which UMC ADSs were allegedly artificially inflated (if at all) during the Class Period; and (6) the extent to which Class members were damaged (if at all). The Defendants deny that they did anything wrong, deny any liability to Lead Plaintiff, and deny that Lead Plaintiff and the Class members have suffered any damages attributable to the Defendants’ actions. Contrary to the Defendants’ assertion, Lead Plaintiff believes that he and the Class suffered damages as a result of Defendants’ actions.
Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case. The Parties do not agree on the average amount of damages per share or note of Colonial Securities that would be recoverable if Lead Plaintiffs were to prevail on the claims against Defendants. Defendants and Tolled Defendants deny all liability and that any of Colonial’s publicly traded securities were damaged as Lead Plaintiffs have alleged. The issues about which the Parties disagree include, for example: (i) whether the prices of Colonial Securities were artificially inflated as a result of the alleged misstatements and omissions by Defendants and Tolled Defendants; (ii) the amount by which the prices of Colonial Securities were artificially inflated, if any, as a result of the alleged misstatements and omissions by Defendants and Tolled Defendants; (iii) the amount of any alleged damages suffered by purchasers of Colonial Securities; (iv) the appropriate economic models for determining the amounts by which the prices of Colonial Securities were allegedly artificially inflated (if at all); (v) the effect of various market forces influencing the trading prices of Colonial Securities; (vi) whether the statements made or facts allegedly omitted were material, false, misleading or otherwise actionable under the federal securities laws; and (vii) whether, even if liability could be proven, total damages would be greater than zero dollars.
Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case below for more information on the The Settling Parties do not agree on whether Lead Plaintiff would have prevailed on any of its claims against the Defendants. They also do not agree on the average amount of damages per share, if any, that would be recoverable if the Class prevailed on the claims alleged. Defendants deny that they have engaged in any wrongdoing as alleged by Lead Plaintiff, deny any liability whatsoever for any of the claims alleged by Lead Plaintiff, and deny that the Class has suffered any injuries or damages. The issues on which the Settling Parties disagree are many, but include:

Related to Statement of Potential Outcome of the Case

  • Staffing Levels to deal with Potential Violence The Employer agrees that, where there is a risk of violence, an adequate level of trained employees should be present. The Employer recognizes that workloads can lead to fatigue and a diminished ability both to identify and to subsequently deal with potentially violent situations.

  • Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) Capability The wind plant shall provide SCADA capability to transmit data and receive instructions from the ISO and/or the Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected, as applicable, to protect system reliability. The Connecting Transmission Owner for the Transmission District to which the wind generating plant will be interconnected and the wind plant Developer shall determine what SCADA information is essential for the proposed wind plant, taking into account the size of the plant and its characteristics, location, and importance in maintaining generation resource adequacy and transmission system reliability in its area.

  • Excellent Above Average Satisfactory Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory 5 4 3 2 1 5. The instructor demonstrates knowledge of the subject matter.

  • Payment Limited to Satisfactory Services Contractor is not entitled to any payments from City until [insert name of department] approves Services, including any furnished Deliverables, as satisfying all of the requirements of this Agreement. Payments to Contractor by City shall not excuse Contractor from its obligation to replace unsatisfactory Deliverables, including equipment, components, materials, or Services even if the unsatisfactory character of such Deliverables, equipment, components, materials, or Services may not have been apparent or detected at the time such payment was made. Deliverables, equipment, components, materials and Services that do not conform to the requirements of this Agreement may be rejected by City and in such case must be replaced by Contractor without delay at no cost to the City.

  • Disease Management If you have a chronic condition such as asthma, coronary heart disease, diabetes, congestive heart failure, and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, we’re here to help. Our tools and information can help you manage your condition and improve your health. You may also be eligible to receive help through our care coordination program. This voluntary program is available at no additional cost you. To learn more about disease management, please call (000) 000-0000 or 0-000-000-0000. About This Agreement Our entire contract with you consists of this agreement and our contract with your employer. Your ID card will identify you as a member when you receive the healthcare services covered under this agreement. By presenting your ID card to receive covered healthcare services, you are agreeing to abide by the rules and obligations of this agreement. Your eligibility for benefits is determined under the provisions of this agreement. Your right to appeal and take action is described in Appeals in Section 5. This agreement describes the benefits, exclusions, conditions and limitations provided under your plan. It shall be construed under and shall be governed by the applicable laws and regulations of the State of Rhode Island and federal law as amended from time to time. It replaces any agreement previously issued to you. If this agreement changes, an amendment or new agreement will be provided.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • Professional Development; Adverse Consequences of School Exclusion; Student Behavior The Board President or Superintendent, or their designees, will make reasonable efforts to provide ongoing professional development to Board members about the adverse consequences of school exclusion and justice-system involvement, effective classroom management strategies, culturally responsive discipline, appropriate and available supportive services for the promotion of student attendance and engagement, and developmentally appropriate disciplinary methods that promote positive and healthy school climates, i.e., Senate Bill 100 training topics. Board Self-Evaluation The Board will conduct periodic self-evaluations with the goal of continuous improvement. New Board Member Orientation The orientation process for newly elected or appointed Board members includes:

  • Introduction and Statement of Policy The National Institutes of Health (NIH) has established NIH-designated data repositories (e.g., database of Genotypes and Phenotypes (dbGaP), Sequence Read Archive (SRA), NIH Established Trusted Partnerships) for securely storing and sharing controlled-access human data submitted to NIH under the NIH Genomic Data Sharing (GDS)

  • Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Bank shall maintain and update from time to time business continuation and disaster recovery procedures with respect to its global custody business, which are designed, in the event of a significant business disruption affecting Bank, to be sufficient to enable Bank to resume and continue to perform its duties and obligations under this Agreement without undue delay or disruption. Bank shall test the operability of such procedures at least annually. Bank shall enter into and shall maintain in effect at all times during the term of this Agreement reasonable provision for (i) periodic back-up of the computer files and data with respect to Customer and (ii) use of alternative electronic data processing equipment to provide services under this Agreement. Upon reasonable request, Bank shall discuss with Customer any business continuation and disaster recovery procedures of Bank. Bank represents that its business continuation and disaster recovery procedures are appropriate for its business as a global custodian to investment companies registered under the 1940 Act.

  • Archival Back-Up and Disaster Recovery Licensee may use and copy the Product and related Documentation in connection with: i) reproducing a reasonable number of copies of the Product for archival backup and disaster recovery procedures in the event of destruction or corruption of the Product or disasters or emergencies which require Licensee to restore backup(s) or to initiate disaster recovery procedures for its platform or operating systems; ii) reproducing a reasonable number of copies of the Product and related Documentation for cold site storage. “Cold Site” storage shall be defined as a restorable back-up copy of the Product not to be installed until and after the declaration by the Licensee of a disaster; iii) reproducing a back-up copy of the Product to run for a reasonable period of time in conjunction with a documented consolidation or transfer otherwise allowed herein. “Disaster Recovery” shall be defined as the installation and storage of Product in ready-to-execute, back-up computer systems prior to disaster or breakdown which is not used for active production or development.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.