Proposed Concession Structure Sample Clauses

Proposed Concession Structure. The concession is structured to facilitate a limited recourse project financing in which the Project is financed mainly on the basis of forecast revenue streams and not through Government debt or balance sheet. This form of financing is now well established globally as a means of developing airport projects and its structure is familiar and indeed mandated by Project finance institutions. As such, the wheel should not be reinvented: tried and tested contractual structures need to be implemented to ensure familiarity to financing institutions and access to private capital. The core structure centers around a Grantor-Concessionaire contract relationship, established on the basis of allocating risks and responsibilities to the party best-placed to manage and control each risk. ProjectCo will raise private capital from equity and debt providers and will enter into the agreements necessary to develop the Project. Following international precedent, the chart below illustrates the proposed contractual structure for the Project. Int’ Banks Devl’ Banks Safety, Security, Economic Finance Grant & Oversight of Concession Project Company Special Purpose Vehicle Project Lenders Lead Arranger Principal & Interest Management Int’ Banks Debt Civil Airports Authority Host Government ‘Grantor’ Civil Aviation Regulator Property Users Service Suppliers Insurance Providers Construction Companies Concession Operator Customers (Airlines) (Passengers) Local Banks Devl’ Banks Figure.2: Airport Concession Structure Sponsor / Proposing Group Equity Returns
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Proposed Concession Structure. The concession is structured to facilitate a limited recourse project financing in which the Project is financed mainly on the basis of forecast revenue streams and not through Government debt or balance sheet. This form of financing is now well established globally as a means of developing airport projects and its structure is familiar and indeed mandated by Project finance institutions. As such, the wheel should not be reinvented: tried and tested contractual structures need to be implemented to ensure familiarity to financing institutions and access to private capital. The core structure centers around a Grantor-Concessionaire contract relationship, established on the basis of allocating risks and responsibilities to the party best-placed to manage and control each risk. ProjectCo will raise private capital from equity and debt providers and will enter into the agreements necessary to develop the Project. Following international precedent, the chart below illustrates the proposed contractual structure for the Project. Int’ Banks Devl’ Banks Safety, Security, Economic Equity Returns Debt Finance

Related to Proposed Concession Structure

  • Contracts Concerning Use of Project The Recipient agrees that during the Agreement Term it will not contract with any Private Person for use of the Project or any portion thereof or the facility or facilities of which the Project is a part for any Private Business Use unless all of the conditions of subparagraph F.3.a., subparagraph F.3.b. or subparagraph F.3.c. are met:

  • Real estate transactions You must sign the certification. You may cross out item 2 of the certification.

  • FALSE STATEMENTS CONCERNING HIGHWAY PROJECTS T h i s p r o v i s i o n i s applicable to all Federal-aid construction contracts and to all related subcontracts. In order to assure high quality and durable construction in conformity with approved plans and specifications and a high degree of reliability on statements and representations made by engineers, contractors, suppliers, and workers on Federal- aid highway projects, it is essential that all persons concerned with the project perform their functions as carefully, thoroughly, and honestly as possible. Willful falsification, distortion, or misrepresentation with respect to any facts related to the project is a violation of Federal law. To prevent any misunderstanding regarding the seriousness of these and similar acts, Form FHWA-1022 shall be posted on each Federal-aid highway project (23 CFR 635) in one or more places where it is readily available to all persons concerned with the project: 18 U.S.C. 1020 reads as follows: "Whoever, being an officer, agent, or employee of the United States, or of any State or Territory, or whoever, whether a person, association, firm, or corporation, knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, or false report as to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of the material used or to be used, or the quantity or quality of the work performed or to be performed, or the cost thereof in connection with the submission of plans, maps, specifications, contracts, or costs of construction on any highway or related project submitted for approval to the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement, false representation, false report or false claim with respect to the character, quality, quantity, or cost of any work performed or to be performed, or materials furnished or to be furnished, in connection with the construction of any highway or related project approved by the Secretary of Transportation; or Whoever knowingly makes any false statement or false representation as to material fact in any statement, certificate, or report submitted pursuant to provisions of the Federal-aid Roads Act approved July 1, 1916, (39 Stat. 355), as amended and supplemented; Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than 5 years or both."

  • The Concession 3.1.1 Subject to and in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement, Applicable Laws and Applicable Permits, the Authority hereby grants to the Concessionaire the concession set forth herein including the exclusive right, licence and authority to construct, operate and maintain the Project (the “Concession”) during the Construction Period and for a period of 10 (ten) years commencing from COD, and the Concessionaire hereby accepts the Concession and agrees to implement the Project subject to and in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth herein.

  • Ownership of Acquired Property Except to the extent that a specific provision of this contract states to the contrary, the State shall own all intellectual property acquired or developed under this contract and all equipment purchased by the Engineer or its subcontractors under this contract. All intellectual property and equipment owned by the State shall be delivered to the State when the contract terminates, or when it is no longer needed for work performed under this contract, whichever occurs first.

  • Additional Material Real Estate Assets (a) Subject to the provisions of Section 5.17(b), in the event that any Loan Party acquires a Real Estate Asset that constitutes a Material Real Estate Asset or a Real Estate Asset owned or leased on the Restatement Date becomes a Material Real Estate Asset as a result of improvements upon such property, and such interest has not otherwise been made subject to the Lien of the Security Documents in favor of the Collateral Agent, for the benefit of Secured Parties, at the time of the acquisition thereof (or within a reasonable time after the completion of the construction of the improvements), such Loan Party shall promptly take all such actions and execute and deliver, or cause to be executed and delivered, all such mortgages, documents, instruments, agreements, opinions and certificates similar to those described in Section 5.11(b) with respect to each such Material Real Estate Asset, that the Collateral Agent shall reasonably request to create in favor of the Collateral Agent, for the benefit of Secured Parties, a valid and, subject to any filing and/or recording referred to herein, perfected First Priority Lien in such Material Real Estate Assets; provided, however, that if the Material Real Estate Asset is a Leasehold Property, and the lease with respect to such Leasehold Property requires lessor consent to effectuate a Mortgage, such Loan Party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain such consent, and, in addition, in the case of any Material Real Estate Asset which is a Leasehold Property for which a memorandum of such Leasehold Property is not recorded, such Loan Party shall use commercially reasonable efforts to obtain fully executed and notarized Record Documents for such Leasehold Property, in proper form for recording in all appropriate places in all applicable jurisdictions. The inability of such Loan Party to obtain a landlord’s consent and/or a Record Document following commercially reasonable efforts to do so, and the concurrent inability of such Loan Party to deliver a Mortgage encumbering such Material Real Estate Asset which is a Leasehold Property shall not be deemed to be a failure to satisfy this Section 5.11(a). In addition to the foregoing, in the case of the U.S. Borrower, at the request of the Collateral Agent, deliver, from time to time, to the Collateral Agent such appraisals as are required by law or regulation of Real Estate Assets with respect to which the Collateral Agent has been granted a Lien and any environmental site assessments or reports that the Administrative Agent or Collateral Agent reasonably request with respect to such Material Real Estate Assets; provided, however, environmental site assessments shall not be required more than once in any twelve (12) month period, unless Collateral Agent has a good faith belief that there is a violation of Environmental Laws or a release of Hazardous Materials at the Real Estate Asset.

  • PROPOSED MOBILITY PROGRAMME The proposed mobility programme includes the indicative start and end months of the agreed study programme that the student will carry out abroad. The Learning Agreement must include all the educational components to be carried out by the student at the receiving institution (in table A) and it must contain as well the group of educational components that will be replaced in his/her degree by the sending institution (in table B) upon successful completion of the study programme abroad. Additional rows can be added as needed to tables A and B. Additional columns can also be added, for example, to specify the study cycle-level of the educational component. The presentation of this document may also be adapted by the institutions according to their specific needs. However, in every case, the two tables A and B must be kept separated, i.e. they cannot be merged. The objective is to make clear that there needs to be no one to one correspondence between the courses followed abroad and the ones replaced at the sending institutions. The aim is rather that a group of learning outcomes achieved abroad replaces a group of learning outcomes at the sending institution, without having a one to one correspondence between particular modules or courses. A normal academic year of full-time study is normally made up of educational components totalling 60 ECTS* credits. It is recommended that for mobility periods shorter than a full academic year, the educational components selected should equate to a roughly proportionate number of credits. In case the student follows additional educational components beyond those required for his/her degree programme, these additional credits must also be listed in the study programme outlined in table A. When mobility windows are embedded in the curriculum, it will be enough to fill in table B with a single line as described below: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Mobility window … Total: 30 Otherwise, the group of components will be included in Table B as follows: Component code (if any) Component title (as indicated in the course catalogue) at the sending institution Semester [autumn / spring] [or term] Number of ECTS* credits Course x … 10 Module y … 10 Laboratory work … 10 Total: 30 The sending institution must fully recognise the number of ECTS* credits contained in table A if there are no changes to the study programme abroad and the student successfully completes it. Any exception to this rule should be clearly stated in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Example of justification for non-recognition: the student has already accumulated the number of credits required for his/her degree and does not need some of the credits gained abroad. Since the recognition will be granted to a group of components and it does not need to be based on a one to one correspondence between single educational components, the sending institution must foresee which provisions will apply if the student does not successfully complete some of the educational components from his study programme abroad. A web link towards these provisions should be provided in the Learning Agreement. The student will commit to reach a certain level of language competence in the main language of instruction by the start of the study period. The level of the student will be assessed after his/her selection with the Erasmus+ online assessment tool when available (the results will be sent to the sending institution) or else by any other mean to be decided by the sending institution. A recommended level has been agreed between the sending and receiving institutions in the inter-institutional agreement. In case the student would not already have this level when he/she signs the Learning Agreement, he/she commits to reach it with the support to be provided by the sending or receiving institution (either with courses that can be funded by the organisational support grant or with the Erasmus+ online tutored courses). All parties must sign the document; however, it is not compulsory to circulate papers with original signatures, scanned copies of signatures or digital signatures may be accepted, depending on the national legislation. * In countries where the "ECTS" system it is not in place, in particular for institutions located in partner countries not participating in the Bologna process, "ECTS" needs to be replaced in all tables by the name of the equivalent system that is used and a weblink to an explanation to the system should be added. CHANGES TO THE ORIGINAL LEARNING AGREEMENT The section to be completed during the mobility is needed only if changes have to be introduced into the original Learning Agreement. In that case, the section to be completed before the mobility should be kept unchanged and changes should be described in this section. Changes to the mobility study programme should be exceptional, as the three parties have already agreed on a group of educational components that will be taken abroad, in the light of the course catalogue that the receiving institution has committed to publish well in advance of the mobility periods and to update regularly as ECHE holder. However, introducing changes might be unavoidable due to, for example, timetable conflicts. Other reasons for a change can be the request for an extension of the duration of the mobility programme abroad. Such a request can be made by the student at the latest one month before the foreseen end date. These changes to the mobility study programme should be agreed by all parties within four to seven weeks (after the start of each semester). Any party can request changes within the first two to five-week period after regular classes/educational components have started for a given semester. The exact deadline has to be decided by the institutions. The shorter the planned mobility period, the shorter should be the window for changes. All these changes have to be agreed by the three parties within a two-week period following the request. In case of changes due to an extension of the duration of the mobility period, changes should be made as timely as possible as well. Changes to the study programme abroad should be listed in table C and, once they are agreed by all parties, the sending institution commits to fully recognise the number of ECTS credits as presented in table C. Any exception to this rule should be documented in an annex of the Learning Agreement and agreed by all parties. Only if the changes described in table C affect the group of educational components in the student's degree (table B) that will be replaced at the sending institution upon successful completion of the study programme abroad, a revised version should be inserted and labelled as "Table D: Revised group of educational components in the student's degree that will be replaced at sending institution". Additional rows and columns can be added as needed to tables C and D. All parties must confirm that the proposed amendments to the Learning Agreement are approved. For this specific section, original or scanned signatures are not mandatory and an approval by email may be enough. The procedure has to be decided by the sending institution, depending on the national legislation.

  • ENCROACHMENT/ACQUISITION The Assignee/Bank has no notice or knowledge of any encroachment or that the Government or any other authority has any immediate intention of acquiring the whole or any part of the Property for roads or any other improvement schemes and if such encroachment shall be found to exist or if the Government or any local authority has any such intention, the same shall not annul the sale or shall any abatement or compensation be allowed in respect thereof.

  • Tax Parcels Each Mortgaged Property constitutes one or more complete separate tax lots or is subject to an endorsement under the related Title Policy insuring same, or in certain instances an application has been made to the applicable governing authority for creation of separate tax lots, which shall be effective for the next tax year.

  • Area of Concern Cracks in walkways and/or patios within property boundaries and/or driveway. Standard: Cracks that do not exceed an average of ½ inch in width and vertical displacement that does not exceed an average of ½ inch are to be expected. Developer or Initial Purchaser must immediately seal all cracks appearing with a waterproof substance.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.