Project Roadmap Clause Samples
Project Roadmap. The Project Roadmap sets out the estimated timelines and key milestones in the Project. The Parties will review and refine the Project Roadmap as the Project progresses, provided that amendments to the Project Roadmap must be approved by the Executive Steering Committee. The Supplier acknowledges and agrees that the target date for the implementation and deployment of the System is and the Parties agree to use commercially reasonable efforts to achieve such date.
Project Roadmap. Currently embedded in the Eduuni workspace, D8 needs to be resubmitted as a self-sustained document. Specifically, it should clearly present the operative and realistic plan of activities for the remaining next 12 months of the project, measurements (KPIs – Key Performance Indicators) for monitoring project progress, major problems expected and a detailed proposal for an amendment and internal reallocation of the budget. This deliverable should also be considered as a living document that the consortium should periodically update. Deliverable D14 - Risk Management Plan. D14 should be resubmitted and include a contingency plan to mitigate the delays in WP3 and reach the stated project objectives. This plan should be prepared as soon as possible. Deliverable D15 - Desk research. D15 needs to be resubmitted; it only provides a table summarizing main services/products emerged from the desk research being undertaken. This deliverable needs to have more structure and look into the specific requirements, components and how they have been addressed in the literature. It is important to provide more details on current developments and make sure that the deliverable is useful on its own. Clarifications are also needed concerning which services among those listed in D15 have been considered for the architecture, what criteria were used to identify/select services in the list. Deliverable D18. Detailed description of the user scenarios with guidelines and advice for developers in WP3. D18 needs to be resubmitted and to include a well-structured presentation of how the framework architecture came up, why the selected components are part of it, how they link together, what are the basic elements of each component, which use cases they can facilitate and how the ESCO ontology has been integrated in the architecture. Information on the “Architecture bank” (mentioned in D17 p.4) should also be provided. Deliverable D35. Stakeholder management plan. D35 needs to be resubmitted since it does not present stakeholder engagement, but the generic dissemination and communication plan as described in D34. Clarifications are also needed concerning how stakeholders have been identified /selected; which/how many stakeholders for each category (among those listed in D34 and D35) are represented/involved in project task forces; which/how many stakeholders for each category (particularly NEETs and immigrants) attended the stakeholders (kick-off and midterm) seminars.
Project Roadmap. The Parties shall address the following areas of project development. The Supplier shall provide its full participation and collaboration in achieving the following tasks in a reasonable timeframe. In order to support the Supplier in meeting its obligations under this paragraph 6,
Project Roadmap. = main dependencies between achievements in roadmap M0 M12 M24 M36 Implemented SON using component model (WP1) Design of transaction model and semantics over a SON (WP3) Requirements for self- managing application servers (WP5) Measured effectiveness of self-* services (WP5) Guidelines for building large self-managing applications (WP5)
Project Roadmap. The Hosting Supplier’s project roadmap is incorporated into schedule 4.1 (Hosting Supplier Solution). The project roadmap identifies the portfolio of Projects and their anticipated sequence required to deliver the Hosting Services and to achieve FMO for each of those Hosting Services. The parties agree that the Project Notification for Project 1 (Capability Build) as identified in the Hosting Supplier’s project roadmap shall be deemed to occur on the Effective Date and the Hosting Supplier shall be the Lead Supplier for Projects 1 – 5 as set out in the project roadmap in schedule 4.1 (Hosting Supplier Solution). Following the Effective Date the Authority shall liaise with the Hosting Supplier and all Other FITS Suppliers and with reference to all their project roadmaps and Supplier Solutions, in order to identify the subsequent Projects to proceed to the initiation phase of the FITS delivery lifecycle as described in the rest of this Part 2. The Authority’s identification of each Project is at the Authority’s sole discretion. The Authority shall thereafter similarly identify further Projects through the Transition Period and thereafter from time to time as required throughout the Term. This process describes how each Project is initiated and how accordingly Milestones, Milestone Dates, Dependencies and Acceptance Criteria become contractually fixed. Having identified a Project, the Authority (at its discretion but acting reasonably) shall nominate and/or provide: