Performance Test Tool Design Clause Samples

Performance Test Tool Design. 11 2.2 Instantiation Process 12 2.3 Test Execution Process 14 2.4 Communication between modules 15 2.5 Test Tool Configuration 16 3 Performance Test Tool Modules Functionality 211 3.1 Timeline Controller 21 3.2 CoAP Client Emulation 21 3.3 Impairment Generator 21 3.4 Passive Monitoring 22 4 Future Developments 23 5 References 24 6 Annex 25 6.1 Configuration Files 25 6.2 Example of a Test Session 35 1.1 About F-Interop
View Source
Performance Test Tool Design. 11 2.1.1 General Principles 11 2.1.2 Generic Design 11 2.1.3 Communication Bus 11 2.2 Instantiation Process 12 2.2.1 Performance Testing Tool Container 12 2.2.2 Orchestration Process with Performance Test Tool 12 2.2.3 Session Teardown 14 2.3 Test Execution Process 14 2.4 Communication between modules 15 2.5 Test Tool Configuration 16 3 Performance Test Tool Modules Functionalities 18 3.1 CoAP Server 18 3.2 Passive Monitoring 18 4 Conclusion 20 5 References 21 6 Annex 22 6.1 Configuration Files 22 6.1.1 Session Orchestrator Configuration Files 22 6.1.2 Dockerfile 24 6.1.3 Internal Supervisor Configuration 24 6.1.4 F-Interop GUI template 26 6.2 Example of a Test Session 28 List of Figures Figure 1 Message flow before test execution 13 Figure 2 Message flow during test execution 14 Figure 3 Example of the message format 16 Figure 4 Test Selection 1 28 Figure 5 Test Selection 2 29 Figure 6 Basic configuration 29 Figure 7 Configuration as JSON 30 Figure 8 Session Instantiation 30 Figure 9 Testing Tool Initialization 31 Figure 10 Started Test 31 Figure 11 Stopped Test 32 List of Tables Table 1 Messages used by the Performance Test Tool 16 Table 2 Configuration Parameters 17 Table 3 CoAP Server Statistics 18 Table 4 Passive Monitoring Statistics 19 List of Acronyms ABC Attribute Based Credential CA Consortium Agreement CoAP Constrained Application Protocol ComSoc Communications Society CS CoAP Server Module DESCA Development of a Simplified Consortium Agreement DHCP Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol DHT Distributed Hash Tables DNS Domain Name System DNSSec Domain Name System Security Extensions DPA Data Protection Authorities DPO Data Protection Officer DUT Device under Test EC European Commission ENISA European Union Agency for Network and Information Security ETSI European Telecommunications Standards Institute EU European Union FP7 Seventh Framework Programme GA Grand Agreement GA General Assembly GPS Global Positioning System GUI Graphical User Interface HTTPS Hypertext Transfer Protocol Secure ICT Information and Communication Technologies ID Identifier IEC International Electrotechnical Commission IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers IERC European Research Cluster on the Internet of Things IETF Internet Engineering Task Force IoT Internet of Things IP Internet Protocol IPC Intellectual Property Committee IPM IPR Monitoring and Exploitation Manager IPR Intellectual Property Rights IPSEC Internet Protocol Security IPv4 Internet Protocol v...
View Source

Related to Performance Test Tool Design

  • Performance Testing (a) All performance tests of the Project, including any Initial Performance Test required in Section 2 of Appendix VIII, will be performed in accordance with the test procedures set forth in Appendix VIII (“Performance Test”), including additional procedures and protocols related to Performance Testing as mutually agreed between Buyer and Seller (“Test Procedures”). Seller shall bear all costs and receive all revenues, if applicable, associated with all Performance Tests. (b) After the Initial Delivery Date and during the Delivery Term, Buyer will have the right to conduct a Performance Test (“Buyer Performance Test”) no more than once a calendar year to demonstrate whether the Project is capable of delivering the Distribution Services at the Contract Capacity. Within 30 calendar days following a Buyer Performance Test, Seller will have the right to retest the Project with a Performance Test (“Seller Retest”). For the avoidance of doubt, the results of any Seller Retest will supersede the results of the preceding Buyer Performance Test. (i) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at or above ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, the Contract Capacity will remain the Initial Contract Capacity; (ii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is capable of delivering Distribution Services at more than or equal to eighty-five (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, but less than ninety-nine percent (99%) of the Initial Contract Capacity (“Testing Band”), the Contract Capacity will be automatically adjusted (upwards or downwards) to the capacity commensurate with the amount of Distribution Services the Project delivered during the Performance Test within the Testing Band. (iii) If a Buyer Performance Test or, if a corresponding Seller Retest has occurred, a Seller Retest demonstrates the Project is not capable of delivering Distribution Services of at least eighty-five percent (85%) of the Initial Contract Capacity, an Event of Default shall occur in accordance with Section 7.1(a)(viii).

  • Performance Tests Contractor shall perform Performance Tests in accordance with Section 11.2 of the Agreement and Attachment S.

  • Performance Improvement Plan timely and accurate completion of key actions due within the reporting period 100 percent The Supplier will design and develop an improvement plan and agree milestones and deliverables with the Authority 3.2 The Authority may from time to time make changes to the KPIs measured as set out in paragraph 3.1 above and shall issue a replacement version to the Supplier. The Authority shall give notice In Writing of any such change to the KPIs measured and shall specify the date from which the replacement KPIs must be used for future reports. Such date shall be at least thirty (30) calendar days following the date of the notice to the Supplier.

  • Acceptance Testing At the time of installation of a LIS trunk group, and at no additional charge, acceptance tests will be performed to ensure that the service is operational and meets the applicable technical parameters.

  • Laboratory Testing All laboratories selected by UPS Freight for analyzing Controlled Substances Testing will be HHS certified.