Interferences, Reissues, Re-Examinations and Oppositions Sample Clauses

Interferences, Reissues, Re-Examinations and Oppositions. If a Third Party initiates a Proceeding related to an interference, reissue, re-examination or opposition of an Akcea Product-Specific Patent, then (A) if such Proceeding * ***Confidential Treatment Requested occurs prior to Option exercise (or after Option exercise with respect to an Akcea Special Product-Specific Patent), Akcea will have the right, but not the obligation, to control the defense of such Proceeding as Akcea determines in Akcea’s sole discretion, and (B) if such Proceeding occurs after Option exercise and does not involve an Akcea Special Product-Specific Patent, Novartis will, at Novartis’ expense, by written notice to Akcea either (i) control the defense of such Proceeding solely to the extent such Proceeding relates to an interference, reissue, re-examination or opposition of an Akcea Product-Specific Patent that is not an Akcea Special Product-Specific Patent, or (ii) have Akcea control the defense of such Proceeding, provided if Novartis makes no such election within a reasonable period of time, then Akcea will have the right, but not the obligation, to control the defense of such Proceeding and Akcea and Novartis will evenly split the cost of such defense. If Akcea elects not to defend against such a Proceeding under (A) in this section above, then Akcea will so notify Novartis in writing within [***] ([***]) calendar days after Akcea first receives written notice of the initiation of such Proceeding, and Novartis will have the right, but not the obligation, to defend against such Proceeding at its sole cost and expense and thereafter Novartis will have the sole right to direct the defense thereof, including the right to settle such claim (but only with the prior written consent of Akcea, which consent will not be unreasonably withheld, delayed or conditioned). In any event, the Party not defending such Proceeding will reasonably assist the other Party and cooperate in any such litigation at the defending Party’s request and expense. Each Party may at its own expense and with its own counsel join any defense initiated or directed by the other Party under this Section 8.5. Each Party will provide the other Party with prompt written notice of the commencement of any such Proceeding under this Section 8.5, and such Party will promptly furnish the other Party with a copy of each communication relating to the alleged infringement that is received by such Party.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Interferences, Reissues, Re-Examinations and Oppositions. If a Third Party initiates a Proceeding related to an interference, reissue, re-examination or opposition of an Isis Product-Specific Patent, Bayer will by written notice to Isis either (i) control the defense of such Proceeding at Bayer’s expense, or (ii) have Isis control the defense of such Proceeding at Bayer’s expense, provided if Bayer makes no such election within a reasonable period of time, then Isis will have the right, but not the obligation, to control the defense of such Proceeding and Isis and Bayer will evenly split the cost of such defense.
Interferences, Reissues, Re-Examinations and Oppositions. If a Third Party initiates a Proceeding related to an interference, reissue, re-examination, inter partes review, post-grant review or opposition of any Ionis Product-Specific Patent, then Novartis will, at Novartis’ expense, by written notice to Ionis either (a) control the defense of such Proceeding (including the right to elect whether to settle such Proceeding), or (b) have Ionis control the defense of such Proceeding. If Novartis makes no such election within [***], then Ionis will have the right, but not the obligation, to control the defense of such Proceeding and Ionis and Novartis will [***]. The Party not defending such Proceeding will reasonably assist the other Party and cooperate in any such litigation at the defending Party’s request and expense. Each Party may at its own expense and with its own counsel join any defense initiated or directed by the other Party under this Section 8.5 (Defense of Claims Brought by Third Parties; Oppositions). Each Party will provide the other Party with prompt written notice of the commencement of any such Proceeding under this Section 8.5 (Defense of Claims Brought by Third Parties; Oppositions), and such Party will promptly furnish the other Party with a copy of each communication relating to the alleged infringement that is received by such Party.

Related to Interferences, Reissues, Re-Examinations and Oppositions

  • Corporate Examinations and Investigations Prior to the Closing Date, the parties acknowledge that they have been entitled, through their employees and representatives, to make such investigation of the assets, properties, business and operations, books, records and financial condition of the other as they each may reasonably require. No investigations, by a party hereto shall, however, diminish or waive any of the representations, warranties, covenants or agreements of the party under this Agreement.

  • Pending Proceedings and Examinations The Registration Statement is not the subject of a pending proceeding or examination under Section 8(d) or 8(e) of the 1933 Act, and the Company is not the subject of a pending proceeding under Section 8A of the 1933 Act in connection with the offering of the Securities.

  • Investigations and Remediations Lessor shall retain the responsibility and pay for any investigations or remediation measures required by governmental entities having jurisdiction with respect to the existence of Hazardous Substances on the Premises prior to the Start Date, unless such remediation measure is required as a result of Lessee's use (including "Alterations", as defined in Paragraph 7.3(a) below) of the Premises, in which event Lessee shall be responsible for such payment. Lessee shall cooperate fully in any such activities at the request of Lessor, including allowing Lessor and Lessor's agents to have reasonable access to the Premises at reasonable times in order to carry out Lessor's investigative and remedial responsibilities.

  • Regulatory Examinations The Sub-Advisor will cooperate promptly and fully with the Advisor and/or the Trust in responding to any regulatory or compliance examinations or inspections (including information requests) relating to the Trust, the Fund or the Advisor brought by any governmental or regulatory authorities having appropriate jurisdiction (including, but not limited to, the SEC).

  • Tax Examinations The IRS has examined (or is foreclosed from examining by applicable statutes) the federal income tax returns of any of the Company’s, the Borrower’s or its Subsidiaries’ predecessors in interest with respect to the Projects for all tax periods prior to and including the taxable year ending December 31, 2009 and the appropriate state Governmental Authority in each state in which the Company’s, the Borrower’s or its Subsidiaries’ predecessors in interest with respect to the Projects were required to file state income tax returns has examined (or is foreclosed from examining by applicable statutes) the state income tax returns of any of such Persons with respect to the Projects for all tax periods prior to and including the taxable year ending December 31, 2009. All deficiencies which have been asserted against such Persons as a result of any federal, state, local or foreign tax examination for each taxable year in respect of which an examination has been conducted have been fully paid or finally settled or are being contested in good faith, and no issue has been raised in any such examination which, by application of similar principles, reasonably can be expected to result in assertion of a material deficiency for any other year not so examined which has not been reserved for in the financial statements of such Persons to the extent, if any, required by GAAP. No such Person has taken any reporting positions for which it does not have a reasonable basis nor anticipates any further material tax liability with respect to the years which have not been closed pursuant to applicable law.

  • ABSENCE OF LITIGATION AND/OR REGULATORY PROCEEDINGS Except as set forth in the SEC Documents, there is no action, suit, proceeding, inquiry or investigation before or by any court, public board, government agency, self-regulatory organization or body pending or, to the knowledge of the executive officers of Company or any of its Subsidiaries, threatened against or affecting the Company, the Common Stock or any of the Company’s Subsidiaries or any of the Company’s or the Company’s Subsidiaries’ officers or directors in their capacities as such, in which an adverse decision could have a Material Adverse Effect.

  • Litigation and Compliance There is no action, suit, investigation, litigation or proceeding against such Legal Entity pending or threatened before any court, governmental agency or arbitrator that challenges, or would reasonably be expected to have a material adverse effect on, the legality, validity or enforceability of this Agreement.

  • Litigation and Orders There is no Proceeding pending or, to Buyer’s Knowledge, Threatened against Buyer, as of the date of this Agreement, that, if decided adversely to Buyer, will materially and adversely affect Buyer’s ability to consummate the transactions contemplated herein. As of the date of this Agreement, Buyer is not subject to any Order that will materially and adversely affect Buyer’s ability to consummate the transactions contemplated herein.

  • Field Audits and Examination Reports; Confidentiality; Disclaimers by Lenders; Other Reports and Information By becoming a party to this Agreement, each Lender:

  • Field Examinations At the Administrative Agent’s sole option, the Administrative Agent shall have completed its field examinations of the Borrower’s books and records, assets, and operations which examinations will be satisfactory to the Administrative Agent in its sole and absolute discretion.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.