Exemplary implementation of a COTEVOS Sample Clauses

Exemplary implementation of a COTEVOS reference grid Figure 5050 shows exemplarily a reference grid, where a parameter variation was applied per feeder. The parameters that were adjusted can be seen in Table 4 and were identified as most promising to estimate the reason for the hosting capacity (PV or EV respectively) limitation reason (Overloading or voltage). The nodes were placed equidistant along the feeder and one load per node was placed. Figure 50: Reference electricity grid example Table 4: Feeder parameters Zone Zk (Ω) R/X Feeder length (km) 1 0.320 3.16 1.2 2 0.530 3.912 1.6 3 0.206 2.153 1.2 4 0.052 2.152 0.3 5 0.180 1.588 1.2 6 0.149 0.898 1.6 A basic scenario was developed to present the effects of the parameter variation. Per household an electric vehicle charging power of 20 kW (e.g. multi-family house) was assumed and a load flow calculation was executed. The first voltage column in Table 6 shows the voltages at the nodes in the reference grid. It can be seen that Zones 1 and 2 are the most effected feeders in the grid. In zone 2 even a voltage drop of nearly 20% can be seen, which indicates that the charging power is not tolerable in this kind of feeders. In a next step, a charging station with reactive power capabilities was assumed to reduce the voltage drop caused by charging. The second voltage column shows the voltage situation in the grid with reactive power provision by each charging station in the households. The comparison of the voltage columns per node shows the voltage gain caused by reactive power. The gain per zone can be seen in Table 4. Table 5: Impact of reactive power provision (capacitive) voltage voltage cos(ϕ)=1 cos(ϕ)= 0.9 cos(ϕ)=1 cos(ϕ)= 0.9 Terminal 1.1 0.958 p.u. 0.964 p.u. Terminal 2.1 0.924 p.u. 0.931 p.u. Terminal 1.2 0.927 p.u. 0.937 p.u. Terminal 2.2 0.866 p.u. 0.880 p.u. Terminal 1.3 0.906 p.u. 0.919 p.u. Terminal 2.3 0.827 p.u. 0.845 p.u. Terminal 1.4 0.895 p.u. 0.910 p.u. Terminal 2.4 0.807 p.u. 0.828 p.u. Terminal 3.1 0.975 p.u. 0.981 p.u. Terminal 4.1 0.994 p.u. 0.995 p.u. Terminal 3.2 0.957 p.u. 0.966 p.u. Terminal 4.2 0.990 p.u. 0.992 p.u. Terminal 3.3 0.944 p.u. 0.956 p.u. Terminal 4.3 0.987 p.u. 0.990 p.u. Terminal 3.4 0.938 p.u. 0.952 p.u. Terminal 4.4 0.985 p.u. 0.989 p.u. Terminal 5.1 0.980 p.u. 0.986 p.u. Terminal 6.1 0.987 p.u. 0.994 p.u. Terminal 5.2 0.965 p.u. 0.975 p.u. Terminal 6.2 0.977 p.u. 0.989 p.u. Terminal 5.3 0.955 p.u. 0.968 p.u. Terminal 6.3 0.971 p.u. 0.986 p.u. Terminal 5.4 0.950 p.u. 0.965 p.u. Terminal 6.4 0.968 p.u...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Exemplary implementation of a COTEVOS

  • Implementation of Agreement Each Party must promptly execute all documents and do all such acts and things as is necessary or desirable to implement and give full effect to the provisions of this Agreement.

  • Application of Funding Techniques to Programs 6.3.1 The State shall apply the following funding techniques when requesting Federal funds for the component cash flows of the programs listed in sections 4.2 and 4.3 of this Agreement.

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Contractor Certification regarding Business with Certain Countries and Organizations Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code], Contractor certifies Contractor is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization. Contractor acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

  • Selection of Subcontractors, Procurement of Materials and Leasing of Equipment The contractor shall not discriminate on the grounds of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age or disability in the selection and retention of subcontractors, including procurement of materials and leases of equipment. The contractor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps to ensure nondiscrimination in the administration of this contract.

  • Application of Agreement 4.1 This Agreement applies to:

  • Promotion of Agreement It is agreed that Vendor will encourage all eligible entities to purchase from the TIPS Program. Encouraging entities to purchase directly from the Vendor and not through TIPS Agreement is a violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and will result in removal of the Vendor from the TIPS Program.

  • OPERATION OF AGREEMENT This Agreement will be effective and binding immediately upon its execution, but, anything in this Agreement to the contrary notwithstanding, this Agreement will not be operative unless and until a Change in Control occurs. Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control at any time during the Term, without further action, this Agreement shall become immediately operative.

  • Distribution of Agreement The Employer agrees to make available to each employee a copy of this Agreement and to provide a copy of the same Agreement to all new employees entering the employment of the Employer.

  • Cyber incident damage assessment activities If DoD elects to conduct a damage assessment, the Contracting Officer will request that the Contractor provide all of the damage assessment information gathered in accordance with paragraph (e) of this clause.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.