Development Plan Dispute Sample Clauses

Development Plan Dispute. If, with respect to a matter that is within the JDC’s duties and involves (i) approval of an initial Development Plan or any material change to any Development Plan, (ii) any other strategic issues regarding development or Regulatory Approval of a Product in the Territory, (iii) approval of any steps to address a Cost Overrun or (iv) a dispute as to whether any Cost Overrun (x) is attributable to a Party or (y) represents a Permissible Cost Overrun, the JDC cannot reach consensus within 15 days after it has met and attempted to reach such consensus, then either Party may, by written notice to the other Party (an “Escalation Notice”), have such matter referred for resolution to, on behalf of Arena, the Chairman of the Managing Directors of Arena and to, on behalf of Eisai, the President of Eisai (collectively, the “Senior Executives”). The Senior Executives shall use good faith efforts to resolve any matter referred to them as soon as practicable. If the Senior Executives are unable to resolve any matter set forth in an Escalation Notice within 30 days after the applicable Party receives such Escalation Notice, then no action will be taken with respect to such matter; provided that (A) subject to clause (B), Arena shall have final decision-making authority with respect to any Development Plan for any Pre-Approval Required Development or any Post-Approval Required Development (subject to Section 3.2(a) and the cost allocation parameters set forth in Section 3.2(a)(Y) or (Z)), except that if Eisai does not approve the use of Arena FTEs with respect to such Pre-Approval Required Development or Post-Approval Required Development, as applicable, (such approval not to be unreasonably conditioned, withheld or delayed) Arena shall have the right to use such FTEs at its own expense in conducting such development work, with the costs of such FTEs not included in Development Expenses for such Pre-Approval Required Development or Post-Approval Required Development, as applicable,
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Development Plan Dispute. If, with respect to a matter that is within the Development Committee’s duties and involves approval of […***…], the Development Committee cannot reach consensus within 15 days after it has met and attempted to reach such consensus, then either Party may, by written notice to the other Party (an “Escalation Notice”), have such matter referred for resolution to, on behalf of ACADIA, the Chief Executive Officer of ACADIA and to, on behalf of BLS, the President of BLS (collectively, the “Senior Executives”). The Senior Executives shall use good faith efforts to resolve the matter referred to them with 15 days of such referral. If, despite such good faith efforts, the Senior Executives are unable to resolve such matter within 30 days of the date of any Escalation Notice, then upon the written request of either Party, […***…].

Related to Development Plan Dispute

  • CENTRAL DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCESS The following process pertains exclusively to disputes and grievances on central matters that have been referred to the central process. In accordance with the School Board Collective Bargaining Act, 2014 central matters may also be grieved locally, in which case local grievance processes will apply. In the event that central language is being grieved locally, the local parties shall provide the grievance to their respective central agents.

  • Informal Dispute Resolution Process 1. In the event there is a dispute under this Centralized Contract, the Contractor, OGS and Authorized User agree to exercise their best efforts to resolve the dispute as soon as possible. The Contractor, OGS and Authorized User shall, without delay, continue to perform their respective obligations under this Centralized Contract which are not affected by the dispute. Primary responsibility for resolving any dispute arising under this Centralized Contract shall rest with the Authorized User’s Contractor Coordinators and the Contractor’s Account Executive and the State & Local Government Regional General Manager.

  • Litigation; Disputes No legal action may be brought against NCCI, its shareholders, officers, employees, and/or agents for actions taken reasonably and in good faith in fulfilling the specifically stated responsibilities of NCCI under this Agreement. NCCI reserves the right to obtain a determination from a court of competent jurisdiction as to the ownership of funds and/or documents in its possession in the event it receives conflicting instructions, instructions which are, in the opinion of NCCI, inconsistent with this Agreement, or if NCCI fails to receive instructions which NCCI concludes that it requires to fulfill its duties under this Agreement. NCCI shall be entitled to reimbursement for all costs, including reasonable attorney’s fees and court costs/expenses incurred by NCCI in connection with obtaining any such determination, and/or in defending any claim made or legal action taken in connection with this Agreement or the agreement(s) between BUYER/MAKER and SELLER/HOLDER which are the subject matter of this collection, except as otherwise specified herein. SELLER/HOLDER hereby gives to NCCI a continuing lien on the proceeds to which they are otherwise entitled under this Agreement to cover such fees, costs and/or expenses.

  • Formal Dispute Process Members representing: (i) any one of the three state Participant Groups or (ii) an aggregate of at least six (6) votes, may appeal the informal Dispute by signing and furnishing to the Regional Director, the Program Manager, and each other Member, a written request to initiate a formal Dispute. This request must, with reasonable specificity, identify the issue(s) in Dispute, the relief sought, and any supporting documentation. If such a request is not received by the Regional Director within ten

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this LGIA and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator(s) must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Interconnection Facilities, or Network Upgrades.

  • Arbitration Decision The arbitrator’s decision will be final and binding. The arbitrator shall issue a written arbitration decision revealing the essential findings and conclusions upon which the decision and/or award is based. A party’s right to appeal the decision is limited to grounds provided under applicable federal or state law.

  • I2 Dispute Resolution I2.1 The Parties shall attempt in good faith to negotiate a settlement to any dispute between them arising out of or in connection with the Contract within twenty (20) Working Days of either Party notifying the other of the dispute and such efforts shall involve the escalation of the dispute to the finance director of the Contractor and the commercial director of the Authority.

  • Central Dispute Resolution Committee a) There shall be established a Central Dispute Resolution Committee (CDRC), which shall be composed of two (2) representatives from each of the central parties, and two (2) representatives of the Crown.

  • Patent Disputes Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Article 11, and subject to the provisions of Section 6.2, any dispute, controversy or claim relating to the scope, validity, enforceability or infringement of any Intrexon Patents shall be submitted to a court of competent jurisdiction in the country in which such Patent was filed or granted.

  • Dispute Resolution Process Any claim, dispute or other matter in question not resolved by the process identified in Paragraph

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.