Definitions proposed by the claimants’ witnesses Sample Clauses

Definitions proposed by the claimants’ witnesses. The paper by Xx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx cited by the Xxxx and others (Wai 2522) claimants provides a useful (though non-exhaustive) definition of Māori data and proposes a series of considerations for determining whether a dataset is a taonga. It states: Māori data refers to data produced by Māori or that is about Māori and the envir- onments we have relationships with. Māori data includes but is not limited to: ӹ Data from organisations and businesses; ӹ Data about Māori that is used to describe or compare Māori collectives; and ӹ Data about te ao Māori that emerges from research.68 Xx Xxxxxxx, who is a member of Xx Xxxx Xxxxxxxx,69 did not offer a defini- tion of ‘Māori data’ in her evidence and instead relied on a definition of ‘indi- genous data’ provided by the United Nations Special Rapporteur on the Protection and Use of Health-Related Data: ‘indigenous data’ refers to data information or knowledge, in any format or medium, which is about, from or may affect Indigenous Peoples or people of First Nations either collectively or individually and may include the language, culture, environ- ments or resources of Indigenous Peoples. Indigenous data includes health-related data relating to Indigenous Peoples.70 This definition extends beyond the Te Mana Raraunga definition – which includes data that is produced by or is about Māori – to include data that may affect indigenous peoples.71 Mr Xxxxxx, arguing that other definitions of Māori data do not go far enough and mainly concern iwi data, proposed his own definition of the term at our hearings.72 His definition appears to have developed the United Nations Special Rapporteur’s indigenous data definition, again expanding it to include data which 67. Transcript 4.1.9, p 157 at [10] 68. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, and Xxx, ‘He Matapihi’, p 65 69. Document b32, p 2 70. Ibid, pp 7–8 at [33]; Xxxxxx X Xxxxxxxxx, Report of the Special Rapporteur on the Right to Privacy, United Nations General Assembly, 74th session, A/74/277, 5 August 2019, xxxxx://xxxxxx. org/A/74/277, p 7 71. Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxx, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx, and Xxx, ‘He Matapihi’, p 65 72. Transcript 4.1.9, p 70 Māori Interests in the Digital Domain
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Definitions proposed by the claimants’ witnesses

  • Determinations and Actions by the Board of Directors All actions, calculations and determinations (including all omissions with respect to the foregoing) which are done or made by the Board of Directors in good faith pursuant to this Agreement, shall not subject the Board of Directors to any liability to the holders of the Rights.

  • Disputes between a Contracting Party and an Investor of the other Contracting Party

  • Dispute Resolution by the Appropriate Commission i) Where any Dispute or differences arises in relation to this agreement of any nature whatsoever including the construction, interpretation or implementation of the provisions of this agreement as well as claim made by any Party for any change in or determination of the Tariff or any matter related to Tariff or claims made by any Party which partly or wholly relate to any change in the Tariff or determination of any of such claims could result in change in the Tariff, and relates to any matter agreed to be referred to the Appropriate Commission, shall be submitted to adjudication by the Appropriate Commission. Appeal against the decisions of the Appropriate Commission shall be made only as per the provisions of the Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxx, 0000, as amended from time to time.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • Settlement of Disputes between the Contracting Parties 1. Disputes between the Contracting Parties concerning the interpretation or application of this Agreement should, if possible, be settled through diplomatic channels.

  • Certification for Federal-Aid Contracts Lobbying Activities A. The CONSULTANT certifies, by signing and submitting this Contract, to the best of its knowledge and belief after diligent inquiry, and other than as disclosed in writing to the LPA prior to or contemporaneously with the execution and delivery of this Contract by the CONSULTANT, the CONSULTANT has complied with Section 1352, Title 31, U.S. Code, and specifically, that:

  • Office of Inspector General Investigative Findings Expert Review In accordance with Senate Bill 799, Acts 2021, 87th Leg., R.S., if Texas Government Code, Section 531.102(m-1)(2) is applicable to this Contract, Contractor affirms that it possesses the necessary occupational licenses and experience.

  • PROCEDURE FOR GRIEVANCES AFFECTING A GROUP OF EMPLOYEES The Union may elect to file a grievance on behalf of two or more employees. The facts and issues of the grievance must be the same.

  • Health and Safety Representative Meetings 13.1 A health and safety representative will be allowed reasonable paid time during working hours to attend occupational health and safety matters, including meetings affecting employees they represent, providing that the Representative informs their manager.

  • Technical Objections to Grievance No grievance will be defeated or denied by any minor technical objection.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.