Consequences of Patent Challenge Sample Clauses

Consequences of Patent Challenge. 6.6.1 Micromet will have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice effective upon receipt if Sanofi or any of its Affiliates directly, or indirectly through assistance granted to a Third Party, commence any interference or opposition proceeding, challenge the validity or enforceability of, or oppose any extension of or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate with respect to, any Patent within the Licensed Technology (each such action a “Patent Challenge”).
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consequences of Patent Challenge. In the event that (1) COMPANY or AFFILIATES brings a PATENT CHALLENGE or assists another party in bringing a PATENT CHALLENGE against XXXXXXXXX and M.I.T. (except as required under a court order or subpoena) or (2) a SUBLICENSEE brings a PATENT CHALLENGE or assists another party in bringing a PATENT CHALLENGE against XXXXXXXXX and M.I.T. (except as required under a court order or subpoena) and COMPANY does not terminate such SUBLICENSEE’S sublicense upon notice by XXXXXXXXX, then in either case ((1) or (2)), COMPANY agrees that (i) XXXXXXXXX, in its sole discretion, may choose at any time following the initiation of such PATENT CHALLENGE to grant one or more licenses to third parties under the PATENT RIGHTS to discover, develop, make, have made, use, sell, lease and import LICENSED PRODUCTS in the FIELD in the TERRITORY and to develop and perform LICENSED PROCESSES in the FIELD in the TERRITORY; (ii) the EXCLUSIVE PERIOD will immediately terminate; and (iii) COMPANY and AFFILIATES shall immediately destroy all TANGIBLE PROPERTY and COMPANY shall confirm such destruction in writing to XXXXXXXXX (and COMPANY shall contractually obligate its SUBLICENSEES to do the same).
Consequences of Patent Challenge. 6.5.1 Each Party will have the right to terminate this Agreement by written notice effective upon receipt if the other Party or any of its Affiliates directly, or indirectly through assistance granted to a Third Party, commence any interference or opposition proceeding, challenge the validity or enforceability of, or oppose any extension of or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate with respect to, in case of Micromet any Patent within the [***] Technology or in case of BI any Patent within the [***] Technology, [***] Technology, [***] Technology, [***] Technology or [***] Technology (each such action a “Patent Challenge”).
Consequences of Patent Challenge. Onconova will be permitted to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to HanX, effective upon receipt, if HanX or any of its Affiliates, directly or indirectly, (i) initiate or request an interference or opposition proceeding with respect to any Onconova Patent, (ii) make, file or maintain any claim, demand, lawsuit or cause of action to challenge the validity or enforceability of any Onconova Patent, or (iii) oppose any extension of, or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate with respect to, any Onconova Patent.
Consequences of Patent Challenge. In the event that Virpax or its Affiliate directly, or through assistance granted to a Third Party, commences any interference or opposition proceeding with respect to, challenges the validity or enforceability of, or opposes any extension of term or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate with respect to, any Lipocure Patent Right, Lipocure shall be entitled to the following rights:
Consequences of Patent Challenge. In the event that (1) COMPANY or AFFILIATES brings a PATENT CHALLENGE or assists another party in bringing a PATENT CHALLENGE against XXXXXXXXX, M.I.T. and/or HARVARD (except as required under a court order or subpoena) or (2) a SUBLICENSEE brings a PATENT CHALLENGE or assists another party in bringing a PATENT CHALLENGE against XXXXXXXXX,M.I.T. and/or HARVARD (except as required under a court order or subpoena) and COMPANY does not terminate such SUBLICENSEE’s sublicense upon notice by XXXXXXXXX, then in either case ((1) or (2)), COMPANY agrees that (i) XXXXXXXXX, in its sole discretion, may choose at any time following the initiation of such PATENT CHALLENGE to grant one or more licenses to third parties under the PATENT RIGHTS to discover, develop, make, have made, use, sell, lease and import LICENSED PRODUCTS in the FIELD in the TERRITORY and to develop and perform LICENSED PROCESSES in the FIELD in the TERRITORY; (ii) the EXCLUSIVE PERIOD will immediately terminate; and (iii) COMPANY and AFFILIATES shall immediately destroy all TANGIBLE PROPERTY and COMPANY shall confirm such destruction in writing to XXXXXXXXX (and COMPANY shall contractually obligate its SUBLICENSEES to do the same).
Consequences of Patent Challenge. 6.3.1 Micromet will be permitted to terminate this Agreement if Viventia or its Affiliates challenge, or intentionally direct or intentionally assist (other than under compulsion of a legal process) a third party to challenge, the validity or enforceability of any of the Patents within the Consolidated Patents. If a licensee or sublicensee of Viventia or its Affiliates (or an Affiliate of such licensee or sublicensee) challenges the validity or enforceability of or otherwise opposes any such Patent under which such person is licensed, then Viventia upon notice by Micromet will terminate such license or sublicense. 6.3.2 Unless prohibited by applicable law, Viventia and its Affiliates will include provisions in all agreements that grant license or sublicense rights under the Patents within the Licensed Technology providing that if the licensee or sublicensee or Affiliates thereof challenge the validity or enforceability of or otherwise opposes any such Patents under which the person is licensed, Viventia may terminate the license or sublicense. 6.4
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Consequences of Patent Challenge. 8.9.1 If Amgen or any of its Affiliates directly, or indirectly through assistance granted to a Third Party (Amgen, its Affiliate or any such Third Party in the context of a Patent Challenge, a “Patent Challenger”), commences any Patent Challenge, then Micromet will have the right, by written notice to Amgen, to terminate Amgen’s license under this Agreement to the Patent(s) at issue. For purposes of this Section 8.9, “
Consequences of Patent Challenge 

Related to Consequences of Patent Challenge

  • Patent Challenge 6.5.1 Licensor may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to Licensee, upon the commencement by Licensee or any of its Affiliates of a Patent Challenge.

  • Termination for Patent Challenge Each Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to the other effective upon receipt, if a Party or any of its wholly-owned Affiliates formally challenges the validity of any Patents that are licensed to it under this Agreement (subject to the exceptions described in this Section 14.2(e), a “Challenge”) (other than as may be necessary or reasonably required to assert a defense, cross-claim or a counter-claim in an action or proceeding asserted by a Party or any of its wholly-owned Affiliates under this Agreement against the other Party or any of its Affiliates or to respond to a court request or order or administrative law, request or order); it being understood and agreed that a Party’s right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 14.2(e) shall not apply to any actions undertaken by an Affiliate of such Party that first becomes such an Affiliate as a result of a Change of Control involving such Party, where such new Affiliate was undertaking any of the activities described in the foregoing clause prior to such Change of Control if such new Affiliate terminates or otherwise ceases participating in such action, proceeding, challenge or opposition within thirty (30) days after the effective date of such Change of Control. If a sublicensee of a Party initiates a Challenge of the intellectual property described in this Section 14.2(e), then such Party shall, upon written notice from the other Party, terminate such sublicense. Neither Party shall, and each Party shall ensure that its Affiliates and sublicensees do not, use or disclose any Confidential Information of the other Party or any nonpublic information regarding the Prosecution or enforcement of any Patents to which a Party or any of its Affiliates or sublicensees are or become privy as a consequence of the rights granted to such Party pursuant to this Agreement, in initiating, requesting, making, filing or maintaining, or in funding or otherwise assisting any other Person with respect to, any Challenge.

  • INFRINGEMENT AND PATENT ENFORCEMENT 11.1 PHS and Licensee agree to notify each other promptly of each infringement or possible infringement of the Licensed Patent Rights, as well as, any facts which may affect the validity, scope, or enforceability of the Licensed Patent Rights of which either party becomes aware.

  • Prosecution of Patents (a) The Licensor shall be solely responsible for preparing, prosecuting and maintaining the BENTLEY Patents.

  • Infringement Controlled Affiliate shall promptly notify Plan and Plan shall promptly notify BCBSA of any suspected acts of infringement, unfair competition or passing off that may occur in relation to the Licensed Marks and Name. Controlled Affiliate shall not be entitled to require Plan or BCBSA to take any actions or institute any proceedings to prevent infringement, unfair competition or passing off by third parties. Controlled Affiliate agrees to render to Plan and BCBSA, without charge, all reasonable assistance in connection with any matter pertaining to the protection of the Licensed Marks and Name by BCBSA.

  • Joint Patent Rights If not already established under the Research Collaboration Agreement, prior to either Party filing any Patent Right disclosing Joint Program Technology or Joint TAP Platform Improvements, the Parties shall establish a patent committee (the “Patent Committee”) comprised of at least one (1) representative of each Party for the purpose of facilitating the preparation, filing, prosecution, maintenance and defense of Joint Patent Rights. As agreed upon by the Parties, meetings of the Patent Committee may be face-to-face or may be conducted by teleconferences or videoconferences, from time to time as needed. The Patent Committee will be the forum through which the Parties coordinate their respective obligations to each other described in Sections 5.2.2 and 5.2.3 hereof and in this Section. In the event the Parties conceive or generate any Joint Program [***] Certain information contained herein has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. Confidential Treatment Requested by CytomX Therapeutics, Inc. Technology or Joint TAP Platform Improvements, the Parties shall promptly meet to discuss and determine, based on mutual consent, whether to seek patent protection thereon, which Party will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents and how to pay for the filing, prosecution and maintenance of such patents. It is presumed that CytomX will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint Program Technology or Joint Unconjugated Probody Platform Improvements, and that ImmunoGen will control filing, prosecution and maintenance of Joint Patent Rights claiming Joint TAP Platform Improvements or Joint Conjugation Probody Platform Improvements. Neither Party will file any Joint Patent Right without the prior written consent of the other Party, which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed. The Party controlling filing and prosecution of any such Joint Patent Right (a) shall keep the other Party informed regarding each Patent Right, (b) shall consider in good faith any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to the filing, prosecution or maintenance of any such Patent Right and (c) shall not unreasonably refuse to incorporate any recommendations made by the other Party in regard to such filing, prosecution or maintenance.

  • Consequences of Breach 26 11. Subordination...........................................................27

  • Prosecution of Patent Applications At its own expense, each Assignor shall diligently prosecute all material applications for (i) United States Patents listed in Annex F hereto and (ii) Copyrights listed on Annex G hereto, in each case for such Assignor and shall not abandon any such application prior to exhaustion of all administrative and judicial remedies (other than applications deemed by such Assignor to be no longer prudent to pursue), absent written consent of the Collateral Agent.

  • Infringement of Patents by Third Parties (a) Except as expressly provided in the remainder of this Section 6.3, Intrexon shall have the sole right to take appropriate action against any person or entity directly or indirectly infringing any Intrexon Patent (or asserting that an Intrexon Patent is invalid or unenforceable) (collectively, “Infringement”), either by settlement or lawsuit or other appropriate action.

  • No Infringement of Third Party IP Rights Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is infringing, misappropriating or otherwise violating, or has ever infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated, any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person. The conduct of the business of the Company and its Subsidiaries has not infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person or constituted unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any jurisdiction, and when conducted in substantially the same manner after the date of this Agreement will not infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person, including patents issuing on patent applications filed as of the date of this Agreement, or constitute unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any jurisdiction (except to the extent due to Company’s ownership by Buyer or its affiliates). Without limiting the generality of the foregoing: (i) no product or service ever produced, distributed, used, provided or sold by or on behalf of the Company or any Subsidiary has ever infringed, misappropriated or otherwise violated any Intellectual Property Right of any other Person; (ii) no infringement, misappropriation or similar Action, or any Action alleging unfair competition or trade practices, is pending or has been threatened against the Company or any Subsidiary or against any other Person who may be entitled to be indemnified, defended, held harmless or reimbursed by the Company or any Subsidiary with respect to such Action; (iii) neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has received any notice or other communication (in writing or otherwise) relating to any actual, alleged or suspected infringement, misappropriation or violation of any Intellectual Property Right of another Person, or any actual, alleged or suspected engagement by the Company or any Subsidiary in unfair competition or trade practices under the laws of any jurisdiction; (iv) neither the Company nor any Subsidiary is bound by any Contract to indemnify, defend, hold harmless or reimburse any other Person with respect to any infringement, misappropriation or violation of any Intellectual Property Right (other than as set forth in Section 3.13(h) of the Disclosure Schedule); and (v) no Action involving any Licensed IP is pending or has been threatened, except for any such Action that, if adversely determined, would not adversely affect (A) the use or exploitation of such Licensed IP by the Company or any Subsidiary or (B) the distribution, hosting, delivery or sale of any Company Product. Neither the Company nor any Subsidiary has ever sought or obtained an opinion of counsel regarding any possible infringement, misappropriation, violation or unlawful use of another Person’s Intellectual Property Rights or the validity or enforceability of another Person’s Intellectual Property Rights.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.