Patent Challenge Sample Clauses

Patent Challenge. 6.5.1 Licensor may terminate this Agreement, effective immediately upon written notice to Licensee, upon the commencement by Licensee or any of its Affiliates of a Patent Challenge.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Patent Challenge. Company has the right to terminate this Agreement upon written notice to Vertex in the event that Vertex or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees directly or indirectly challenges in a legal or administrative proceeding the patentability, enforceability, or validity of any Licensed Patent (a “Patent Challenge”). In the event of such a Patent Challenge, Company will provide written notice of such Patent Challenge to Vertex, and if Vertex (a) with respect to a patent challenge brought by Vertex or an Affiliate of Vertex, fails to withdraw such Patent Challenge within [***] after such receipt of such notice or (b) with respect to a Patent Challenge brought by a Sublicensee, fails to cause the Sublicensee to withdraw such Patent Challenge within [***] after such receipt of such notice or to terminate the applicable sublicense agreement for such Sublicensee within [***] after receipt of such notice, then, in either case of (a) or (b), Company may terminate this Agreement by providing written notice of such termination to Vertex. As used herein, a Patent Challenge includes: (i) filing an action under 28 U.S.C. §§ 2201-2202 seeking a declaration of invalidity or unenforceability of any such Patent; (ii) filing, or joining in, a petition under 35 U.S.C. § 311 to institute inter partes review of any such Patent; (iii) filing, or joining in, a petition under 35 U.S.C. § 321 to institute post-grant review of any such Patent or any portion thereof; (iv) filing or commencing any opposition, nullity, or similar proceedings challenging the validity of any such Patent in any country or region; or (v) any foreign equivalent of clauses (i), (ii), (iii) or (iv), including under Applicable Law. Notwithstanding the foregoing, Company will not have the right to terminate this Agreement under this Section 9.4 (x) with respect to any Patent Challenge in which Vertex or its Affiliate or Sublicensee has been compelled to participate in such Patent Challenges by a court or patent office or (y) if a Patent Challenge is necessary or reasonably required to assert a cross claim or a counterclaim or to respond to a court request or order or administrative law request or order, including asserting any defense or counterclaim in, or otherwise responding to, any Patent infringement suit filed by Company or any of its Affiliates, licensors, licensees or sublicensees against Vertex or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees. In addition, Company will not have the right to terminate this Agreeme...
Patent Challenge. If Licensee, its Affiliate, a Sublicensee or an Affiliate of a Sublicensee commences an action in which it challenges the validity, enforceability or scope of any of the Patent Rights (a “Challenge Proceeding”), Licensee will first provide Elkurt with at [####] days’ prior written notice that it intends so to do before filing such a challenge. Following the giving of such notice, Licensee will pay to Elkurt the amounts due under Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 at the rate of two times the applicable rate during the pendency of such Challenge Proceeding. Should the outcome of such Challenge Proceeding determine that any claim of a patent challenged by Licensee is valid and/or infringed and/or enforceable, as applicable, Licensee will thereafter pay to Elkurt the amounts due under Sections 4.2.1 and 4.2.2 at the rate of three times the applicable rate for all Licensed Products sold that would infringe such claim and/or transactions that include a grant of rights to such claim. Such increased amounts reflect the increased value of the Patent Rights upheld in such action. In the event that a Challenge Proceeding is partially or entirely successful, Licensee will have no right to recoup any amounts paid to Elkurt before or during the period of the challenge. Additionally, Licensee agrees to disburse any and all proceeds received from any Sublicense of the applicable Patent Rights throughout the duration of any such challenge to Elkurt, and agrees to reimburse Elkurt for all costs actually incurred by Elkurt in connection with the Challenge Proceeding. In the event that all or any portion of this Section 4.2.3 is invalid, illegal or unenforceable, then the parties will use their best efforts to replace the invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision(s) with valid, legal and enforceable provision(s) which, insofar as practical, gives effect to the intent of this Section 4.2.3.
Patent Challenge. Dimension may terminate this Agreement if Bayer or any of its Affiliates institutes a Patent Challenge. Such termination will be effective […***…] after written notice from Dimension to Bayer unless within such […***…] Bayer or its Affiliates causes such Patent Challenge to terminate. “Patent Challenge” means […***…].
Patent Challenge. Exelixis shall have the right to terminate this Agreement immediately in its entirety upon written notice to Licensee if Licensee or any of its Affiliates or Sublicensees directly, or indirectly through any Third Party, commences any interference or opposition proceeding with respect to, challenges the validity or enforceability of, or opposes any extension of or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate with respect to, any Exelixis Patent.
Patent Challenge. If Licensee, a Sublicensee, any of their Affiliates, or any entity or person acting on behalf of any of them (“Challenging Party”) commences an action in which it challenges the validity, enforceability or scope of any of the Patent Rights (a “Challenge Proceeding”), the royalty rate specified in Section 4.4.1 will be doubled with respect to Net Sales of Licensed Products that are sold during the pendency of such Challenge Proceeding. If the outcome of such Challenge Proceeding is a determination against the Challenging Party, (a) the royalty rate specified in Section 4.4.1 with respect to Net Sales of Licensed Products that are covered by the Patent Rights that are the subject of such Challenge Proceeding shall remain at such doubled rate and (b) Licensee shall reimburse Harvard for all expenses incurred by Harvard (including reasonable attorneys’ fees) in connection with such Challenge Proceeding. Harvard may invoice Licensee on a quarterly basis with respect to such costs and expenses and Licensee shall make payment withint thirty (30) days after receipt of such invoice. If the outcome of such Challenge Proceeding is a determination in favor of the Challenging Party, Licensee will have no right to recoup any royalties paid before or during the pendency of such Challenge Proceeding.
Patent Challenge. In the event that Juno or any of its agents, Affiliates or Juno Sublicensees is or becomes a Challenging Party, then (a) Juno shall provide Editas with at least [**] days’ notice prior to taking any such action, (b) [**], either directly or under the terms of the Harvard-Broad License, within [**] days after [**]; (c) the exclusive licenses granted in this Agreement may, as of the date of initiation of said challenge or opposition, upon notice by Editas to Juno, be converted by Editas at its option into non-exclusive licenses for the remainder of the Term, and in such event Editas shall have the right to grant licenses under the Editas IP to third parties in the Exclusive Field, subject to the then-existing non-exclusive license provided herein; (d) if any fees, royalties, milestones or revenues payable to Institutions under the Harvard-Broad License double in amount as a result of such Patent Challenge, [**]; and (e) at any time after the Patent Challenge is brought, Editas may, at its option, terminate this Agreement according to Section 13.5; provided that if any of subsections (a) through (e) are held invalid or unenforceable for any reason, such invalidity or unenforceability shall not affect any of the other said subsections. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, Juno shall not have the right to assume or participate in the defense, settlement or other disposition of such Patent Challenge through its status as licensee under this Agreement, but [**]. The Parties agree that any challenge or opposition to a Patent Right by Juno may be detrimental to Editas, and that the above provisions shall constitute reasonable liquidated damages to reasonably compensate Editas for any loss it may incur as a result of Juno taking such action.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Patent Challenge. If Licensee or its Affiliate conducts or materially participates in any Patent Challenge (as defined below), then Mirati may terminate this Agreement on written notice, unless all such Patent Challenge activities are permanently ceased and terminated within [***] of Licensee’s receipt of such notice from Mirati. As used herein, a “Patent Challenge” means any direct or indirect through the actions of another person acting on Licensee’s or its Affiliate’s or Sublicensee’s behalf dispute or challenge by Licensee or its Affiliate or Sublicensee, or any willful assistance (other than as compelled by subpoena or other legal process) by Licensee or its Affiliate or Sublicensee in the dispute or challenge by another person or entity, of the validity, patentability, or enforceability of any Licensed Patent, or any equivalent Patent of Mirati outside the Licensed Territory, or any claim thereof, or opposition or assistance in the opposition of the grant of any letters patent within the Licensed Patents, or any equivalent Patent of Mirati outside the Licensed Territory, in any legal or administrative proceedings in a court of law, before any patent office or other similar agency or tribunal with appropriate jurisdiction in any country, Region, territory or jurisdiction, including by reexamination, inter partes review, opposition, interference, post-grant review, nullity proceeding, preissuance submission, third party submission, derivation proceeding or declaratory judgment action. If any Sublicensee of Licensee or its Affiliate conducts or materially participates in any Patent Challenge (as defined above), then Mirati may terminate this Agreement on written notice, unless (i) such Patent Challenge activities are permanently ceased and terminated within [***] of Licensee’s receipt of such notice from Mirati, (ii) Licensee or its Affiliate terminates the applicable Sublicense Agreement in accordance with Section 2.2 within [***] of Licensee’s receipt of such written notice from Mirati, or (iii) such Patent Challenge is based solely on the scope of a Licensed Patent or whether a claim therein qualifies as a Valid Claim and was made in defense of a breach claim first brought by Mirati against Licensee or its Affiliates.
Patent Challenge. Yakult and its Affiliates hereby covenant and agree not to, directly or indirectly, commence or maintain any opposition proceeding, challenge the validity or enforceability of, or, without limiting Yakult’s rights under Section 7.5, oppose any extension of or the grant of a supplementary protection certificate, with respect to any Celsion Patent Rights, actively participate in any interference proceeding (each such action, a “Patent Challenge”). To the extent the foregoing is unenforceable under the Law of a particular Country where a patent application within the Celsion Patent Rights is pending or a patent within the Celsion Patent Rights is issued, (a) Yakult and its Affiliates shall provide at least [ * ] notice to Celsion before challenging the validity of any Celsion Patent Right and (b) Celsion shall be permitted to terminate this Agreement by written notice effective upon receipt if Yakult or its Affiliates * Material has been omitted and filed separately with the Commission. directly, or indirectly through a Third Party, commence or maintain any Patent Challenge. Yakult shall include provisions in all agreements granting sublicenses of Yakult’s rights hereunder providing that if the sublicensee or its Affiliates undertake a Patent Challenge with respect to any Celsion Patent Right under which the sublicensee is sublicensed, Yakult shall be permitted to terminate such sublicense agreement in its entirety. If a sublicensee of Yakult (or an Affiliate of such sublicensee) undertakes a Patent Challenge of any such Celsion Patent Right under which such sublicensee is sublicensed, then Yakult upon receipt of notice from Celsion of such Patent Challenge may terminate the applicable sublicense agreement in its entirety. If Yakult fails to so terminate such sublicense agreement, Celsion shall terminate all licensed rights granted to Yakult covered by such sublicense agreement and any sublicenses previously granted in such Country(ies) shall automatically terminate. Yakult shall cooperate with Celsion’s reasonable requests to cause such terminated sublicensee to discontinue all activities under such sublicense agreement.
Patent Challenge. If a Related Party commences an action in which it challenges the validity, enforceability or scope of any of the Compugen Patent Rights (a “Challenge Proceeding”) and the outcome of such Challenge Proceeding is a determination in favor of Compugen, then in addition to any other rights Compugen may have under this Agreement or under applicable law, Bayer shall [***] for all [***]with [***].
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.