Assessment of Effects. A. In preparing the Submission Packet for the SHPO/THPO and consulting parties pur- suant to Section VII of this Nationwide Agreement and Attachments 3 and 4, the Ap- plicant shall: (1) Define the area of potential effects (APE); (2) identify Historic Properties within the APE; (3) evaluate the historic sig- nificance of identified properties as appro- priate; and (4) assess the effects of the Un- dertaking on Historic Properties. The stand- ards and procedures described below shall be applied by the Applicant in preparing the Submission Packet, by the SHPO/THPO in reviewing the Submission Packet, and where appropriate, by the Commission in making findings.
Assessment of Effects. If archaeological sites meeting the criteria for listing in the NRHP are identified as a result of the activities described in Stipulation II.A, above, VDOT shall assess the effects of the Project on these archaeological sites in a manner consistent with 36 C.F.R. 800.5, and submit its recommendations to the SHPO for its review and concurrence, and to the Consulting Parties for review and comment, pursuant to the requirements of Stipulation VI.B, below.
Assessment of Effects. Once historic properties have been identified within a project APE, whether as a result of new or of previous survey, the next step is to assess whether or not the project will have an effect on these projects. Assessment of effects can follow one of the paths described below. The first is for HPT Staff to make a finding of No Historic Properties Affected. The second is a finding of No Adverse Effect with Standard Conditions, following Attachment 5 of the PA. Where the standard conditions in Attachment 5 do not apply, the HPT Staff makes a finding of No Adverse Effect. The third path is for an HPT Staff to make a finding of Adverse Effect. Each of these paths is discussed in more detail below.
Assessment of Effects. A. Application of Criteria Caltrans shall apply the Criteria of Adverse Effect set forth in 36 CFR 800.5(a)(1) to findings made pursuant to Stipulation IX.B, taking into account views provided by consulting parties or the public. When Indian tribes attach religious or cultural significance to identified historic properties, Caltrans shall apply the criteria in consultation with those tribes, unless the tribes request direct government-to- government consultation with FHWA pursuant to Stipulation IV.A.
Assessment of Effects a) As part of its consideration of the effects of construction and operations on the landscape, the NRC conducted a line-of-sight analysis to assess the potential for adverse visual effects on all known historic properties located within three miles of the tallest buildings on both the Xxxxx and Burdock facilities.
Assessment of Effects. The BLM will, in consultation with the Consulting Parties, make findings of effect consistent with 36 CFR 800.4(d) and identify any adverse effects to historic properties within the APE in accordance with the criteria established at 36 CFR 800.5(a)(1) and (2)(i)-(vii).
Assessment of Effects a) Reference: 36 CFR 800.4(d) and for AE 36 CFR 800.5(a)(1) and (2)i-vii
Assessment of Effects. The Caltrans District shall assess whether a project or activity may adversely affect a state- owned historical resource by using the list of adverse effects defined in Stipulation IV.D, will propose findings pursuant to Stipulations X.A, X.B, and X.C. The Caltrans District shall take into account the views provided by any Indian Tribe and other interested parties or the public.
Assessment of Effects. 1. BLM, in consultation with the SHPO and any Identified Indian Tribe that attaches religious and cultural significance to the identified historic property(ies), shall apply the criteria of adverse effect to historic properties within the Project APEs in accordance with the terms of 36 C.F.R. § 800.5. BLM shall consider any views concerning such effects that have been provided by consulting parties and the public.
Assessment of Effects a. The Lead Project Sponsor, in coordination with the Lead Federal Agency, shall provide a description of historic properties, if present, and an effect finding to the Virginia SHPO and Consulting Parties for review and comment in accordance with Stipulation III.C.3. Upon Virginia SHPO concurrence with the identification of historic properties and a “No Historic Properties Affected” finding, no further consultation for that portion of the Project is required and that portion may move forward to construction. Upon Virginia SHPO concurrence, and no objection from a Consulting Party, with a “No Adverse Effect” finding, no further consultation for that portion of the Project is required and that portion may move forward to construction.
