Common use of Annual Merit Review Clause in Contracts

Annual Merit Review. In addition to review for renewal, NTT Librarian Faculty, as all instructional staff, including tenure-track faculty, must be evaluated annually according to Article VIII: Merit Evaluation. These evaluations of performance will take the form of standard, faculty review procedures. The Xxxx of the Library is responsible for annual evaluation of the NTT Librarian Faculty member for librarianship, teaching or teaching-related activities, and professional development, according to library criteria. Library criteria for merit must be developed by library faculty and be approved by them, and by the Library Xxxx and Xxxxxxx. The official library criteria must include the date of librarian faculty approval. Evaluations will be kept on file as one basis for decisions regarding reappointment. The general criteria for annual review for merit (salary) raises of NTT Librarian Faculty are shown below, but the specific criteria will be developed by Library Xxxx. Librarianship, teaching or teaching-related activities, and professional development 80% Service to the librarian faculty member’s profession, FHSU, and the community, apportioned by agreement between the faculty member and Library Xxxx. 10% Scholarship 10%