A Database of Judicial Decisions Sample Clauses

A Database of Judicial Decisions. The 1999 Montreal Conference rightly pointed out that judges are not all aviation regulatory experts25 with an aviation law background.26 Even experts wishing to ensure a uniform application of the 1999 Montreal Convention through an analysis of foreign case law meet certain hindrances. Amongst various obstacles, one of the most regrettable is that, depending on the jurisdiction, not all decisions are published. The proliferation of different journals, reports and search engines also increases the difficulty for local Courts to have quick access to relevant foreign air law decisions. Most of these hurdles were recognized from early on. For example, in 1977, Xx. Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx noted that: A better diffusion of the judicial decisions interpreting the uniform law has been advocated as a means of lessening divergences by letting courts know of existing precedents adopted in other countries.27 In order to tackle this issue, one solution could be to gather relevant case law in a specific database.28 Certain Uniform Instruments already benefit from such centralization. The jurisprudence of the UNCITRAL conventions are, for instance, gathered on an online public platform.29 The jurisprudence of certain Uniform Instru- ments related to transportation by sea also benefits from an online platform organized on the initiative of the Comité Maritime International and managed in cooperation with the National University of Singapore.30 A database of deci- sions regarding the application of the CMR was also organized, in the past by UNIDROIT,31 and now by the Institut du Droit International des Transports.32 25 ICAO Doc 9775, International Conference on Air Law (Convention for the Unification of Certain Rules for International Carriage by Air), Montreal, 10 – 28 May 1999, volume I, Minutes, Montreal 1999, p. 154.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to A Database of Judicial Decisions

  • Notification of Modifications of Licensed Materials From time to time Publisher may add, change, or modify portions of the Licensed Materials, or migrate the Licensed Materials to other formats. When such changes, modifications, or migrations occur, the Licensor shall give notice of any such changes to Licensee as soon as is practicable, but in no event less than sixty (60) days in advance of modification. Such a notice may also be given directly by the Publisher to the Licensee. If any of the changes, modifications, or migrations renders the Licensed Materials substantially less useful to the Licensee, the Participating Institutions or their Authorized Users, the Licensee may seek to terminate this Agreement for breach pursuant to the termination provisions of this Agreement in Section XI, below.

  • Effect of Non-Agreement on Guidelines Applications The parties understand, acknowledge and agree that there are no agreements between the parties with respect to any Sentencing Guidelines issues other than those specifically listed in Paragraph 10, and its subsections. As to any other Guidelines issues, the parties are free to advocate their respective positions at the sentencing hearing.

  • Privacy Consent; Consent to Publication of Agreement Contributor consents to the OpenID Privacy Policy and also agrees that OIDF may publish a copy of this Agreement as signed by Contributor via posting on the OIDF publicly-accessible website, and Contributor consents to such publication. If Contributor is a Legal Entity Contributor, it also represents that it has obtained appropriate consent under applicable law from all individuals listed in this Agreement to the publication of this Agreement and their personal information listed herein. The parties have formed this Agreement as of the Effective Date. OPENID FOUNDATION (“CONTRIBUTOR”) By: (Sign) Xxxx Xxxxxx By: (Sign) Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx Name: (Print) Title: Program Manager 7/21/2022 Name: (Print) Title: Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx 7/18/2022

  • Effect of Addenda, Bulletins, and Change Orders No special implication, interpretation, construction, connotation, denotation, import, or meaning shall be assigned to any provision of the Contract Documents because of changes created by the issuance of any (1) Addendum, (2) Bulletin, or (3) Change Order other than the precise meaning that the Contract Documents would have had if the provision thus created had read originally as it reads subsequent to the (1) Addendum, (2) Bulletin, or (3) Change Order by which it was created.

  • ARBITRATION AND WAIVER OF JURY TRIAL (a) This paragraph concerns the resolution of any controversies or claims between the parties, whether arising in contract, tort or by statute, including but not limited to controversies or claims that arise out of or relate to: (i) this agreement (including any renewals, extensions or modifications); or (ii) any document related to this agreement (collectively a “Claim”). For the purposes of this arbitration provision only, the term “parties” shall include any parent corporation, subsidiary or affiliate of the Bank involved in the servicing, management or administration of any obligation described or evidenced by this agreement.

  • Interpretation and Application For purposes of this Chapter:

  • CONTRACTOR’S SUBMISSION OF CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS In connection with any Contract modification, OGS reserves the right to:  request additional information  reject Contract modifications  remove Products from Contract modification requests  request additional discounts for new or existing Products

  • GOVERNING LAW, JURISDICTION AND DISPUTE RESOLUTION The rights and obligations of the Parties under the Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of India. The TDSAT, to the exclusion of all other courts, shall have exclusive jurisdiction in respect of any dispute between the Parties arising out of or in connection with or as a result of this Agreement.

  • Exceptions to Informal Negotiations and Arbitration The Parties agree that the following Disputes are not subject to the above provisions concerning informal negotiations and binding arbitration: (a) any Disputes seeking to enforce or protect, or concerning the validity of, any of the intellectual property rights of a Party; (b) any Dispute related to, or arising from, allegations of theft, piracy, invasion of privacy, or unauthorized use; and (c) any claim for injunctive relief. If this provision is found to be illegal or unenforceable, then neither Party will elect to arbitrate any Dispute falling within that portion of this provision found to be illegal or unenforceable and such Dispute shall be decided by a court of competent jurisdiction within the courts listed for jurisdiction above, and the Parties agree to submit to the personal jurisdiction of that court. CORRECTIONS There may be information on the Site that contains typographical errors, inaccuracies, or omissions, including descriptions, pricing, availability, and various other information. We reserve the right to correct any errors, inaccuracies, or omissions and to change or update the information on the Site at any time, without prior notice.

  • WAIVER OF NEGOTIATIONS The Board and Union acknowledge that during negotiations resulting in this Agreement, each party had the right and opportunity to make demands and proposals with respect to any matter and that this Agreement was arrived at by the parties after the exercise of that right and opportunity. The Board and the Union shall voluntarily waive, during the life of this Agreement said rights and each agrees that the other shall not be obligated to negotiate with respect to any subject or matter irrespective of whether such matters or subject is specifically referred to or covered in this agreement, even though such subject or matter may not have been within the knowledge or contemplation of either or both parties at the time negotiations were being conducted or at the time the party signed this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.