Examples of Nevada Litigation in a sentence
The Company offers to third parties energy procurement, liquidation and risk management services, combustion turbine component parts, engineering and repair and maintenance services.The Nevada Litigation The Nevada Litigation arises out of a series of agreements between Nevada Power and Calpine and Moapa Energy Center LLC (“Moapa”), a Calpine subsidiary, involving the Centennial Project in Las Vegas, Nevada.
Calpine Corporation, Moapa Energy Center, LLC, Fireman’s Insurance Company, and Does I-X, (the “Nevada Litigation”), against a co-defendant, Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (Fireman’s), pursuant to section 362 of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), or, in the alternative, enjoining the continuation of the Nevada Litigation under section 105 of the Bankruptcy Code until the Debtors emerge from their Chapter 11 proceedings.
Nevada Litigation with Genentech, Roche and Novartis in Nevada State Court In August 2010, we filed a complaint in the Second Judicial District of Nevada, Washoe County, naming Genentech, Roche and Novartis as defendants.
Each Party warrants and represents that there is no Legal Proceeding pending on the Effective Date that was commenced by such Party or any of its Affiliates against any other Party or any of its Affiliates involving any of the PDL Licensed Patents, except for the Nevada Litigation and the AAA Arbitration.
Thereafter, the Debtors’ management and professionals will have to be present in Nevada and/or the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals to adjudicate pending cases.5Finally, the unsecured creditors appear to be of a diverse geographical base and many of them have already participated in the Nevada Litigation.
Both the parties involved in the Nevada Litigation and the litigation itself will be at the core of any effort by the Debtors to proceed with the case at bar.
Not later than three (3) business days after the Effective Date, the Parties shall cause their counsel to execute and promptly file a stipulated order of dismissal (substantially in the form of Exhibit H attached hereto) dismissing with prejudice all claims in the Nevada Litigation pursuant to Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(ii).
Each Party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the Nevada Litigation and the Writ Proceeding.
The Moving Direct Lenders allege that a majority of the Direct Lenders, who have actively participated in the Nevada Litigation, live either in or near Nevada.
Similarly, the parties in interest are accustomed to pursuing their claims and interests in Nevada courts.Further, as referenced previously, the Nevada Litigation is not collateral litigation that need not be addressed at the early stages of the case.