Timing/Process Sample Clauses
The Timing/Process clause defines the specific deadlines and procedural steps that parties must follow to fulfill their obligations under an agreement. It typically outlines when certain actions must be taken, such as delivery dates, notice periods, or milestones for performance, and may describe the sequence in which these steps should occur. By clearly establishing the timeline and process for key activities, this clause helps prevent misunderstandings and ensures that all parties are aware of their responsibilities and the order in which tasks must be completed.
Timing/Process. The Superintendent’s evaluation shall be conducted by August 31 each year for the previous fiscal year. The Superintendent shall be responsible for notifying the Board, in writing, of these timelines so that the Board’s evaluation of the Superintendent can be conducted in a timely manner. Nothing shall prevent the Board from conducting more than one formal or informal evaluation each school year. In addition to the summative evaluation, the Board shall conduct at least one formative evaluation no later than March 31 of each year to share comments and hear progress reports related to the Board’s goals for the Superintendent. The final evaluation, the Superintendent's self-evaluation, action plans, and all related documents shall be placed in the Superintendent's personnel file.
Timing/Process. The timing values, for use in ExcelCare, are recorded by nurses/midwives using work-sampling techniques. The relevant definition is for stop/start times. That is, timing commences at the point when the nurses begins preparation for the activity and stops when the nurse and midwife completes the activity, including cleaning up and disposal of equipment where this is defined in the OI. Interruptions are excluded from the time. A total of 20 timings are collected randomly and should be representative of all areas and patients where the activity occurs and a range of nursing expertise. If the timings sample reveals that some patient groups have significant deviations from the mean, consideration should be given to reviewing if the UoC is appropriate to the needs of the patient group. Possible bias that may occur during the timing process, that may influence the quality of timings, could include: • reliability of collection • definition and specificity of activity to be timed • skill of nurse performing procedure • differences in procedures/activities between areas • geography of work areas • patient variables If there is bias operating related to geography and skill then the total sample should included 20 timings of each skill or type of geographical setting. The direct timing should be collected within a few weeks to reduce any possible bias's that may occur. If it is not possible to collect the timings within this period of time, then the UoC should: • Professionally assessed time added until there is significant timings collected; or • The UoC should be time adjusted. As agreed to by the Department of Human Services (now DH) and the then ANF (now ANMF) on 22 November 2002: References
1. Department of Human Services, Directors of Nursing, Australian Nursing Federation, 'Operational Issues Associated With Excelcare' (v2 300902), 2003
2. South Australian Health Commission, Nursing Automated Systems Project, 'Direct /Indirect Timings' Document
3. South Australian Health Commission Nursing Automated Systems Project, ‘Statistical Validation of Timings for Excelcare’ Document. 2 As Agreed by Department of Human Services, Directors of Nursing, Australian Nursing Federation, 'Operational Issues Associated With Excelcare' (v2 300902), 2002
Section 1: Nursing and Midwifery Shift by Shift Staffing Requirements Decision Making Tree
Section 2: Staffing Methodologies in Emergency Departments, Intensive Care Units, Peri-Operative Services and Endoscopy Units
Section 3: St...
Timing/Process. The Assistant Superintendent, Educational Services’ evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year.
Timing/Process. The Interim Superintendent’s evaluation shall be conducted by August 31 each year for the previous fiscal year. The Interim Superintendent shall be responsible for notifying the Board, in writing, of these timelines so that the Board’s evaluation of the Interim Superintendent can be conducted in a timely manner. Nothing shall prevent the Board from conducting more than one formal or informal evaluation each school year. In addition to the summative evaluation, the Board shall conduct at least one formative evaluation no later than March 31 of each year to share comments and hear progress reports related to the Board’s goals for the Interim Superintendent. The final evaluation, the Interim Superintendent's self-evaluation, action plans, and all related documents shall be placed in the Interim Superintendent's personnel file.
Timing/Process. The Superintendent’s evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year. The Superintendent shall be responsible for notifying the Board, in writing, of these timelines so that the Board’s evaluation of the Superintendent can be conducted in a timely manner. Nothing shall prevent the Board from conducting more than one formal or informal evaluation each school year.
Timing/Process. The Assistant Superintendent of Business Services’ evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year. Inability to meet this deadline shall not invalidate the evaluation.
Timing/Process. The Assistant Superintendent, Human Resources’ evaluation shall be conducted by June 30th each year for the previous fiscal year.