Their Relevance Sample Clauses

Their Relevance. As part of an analysis of the 1999 Montreal Convention, references may be made to the Working Documents or ‘Travaux Préparatoires’ of different international instruments. The Travaux Préparatoires mainly record work done prior to and during diplomatic conferences, which often leads to the adoption of international instruments. This analysis may make regular use of the Travaux Préparatoires of the following diplomatic conferences: – Conférence Internationale de Droit Xxxxx Xxxxxx, held in Paris, in October and November 1925 (hereinafter the ‘1925 Paris Conference’),194 which prepared the II Conférence Internationale de Droit Xxxxx Xxxxxx, held in Warsaw, in October 1929 (hereinafter the ‘1929 Warsaw Conference’),195 which was concluded by the adoption of the 1929 Warsaw Convention; – International Conference on Private Air Law, held in The Hague, in September 1955 (hereinafter the ‘1955 Hague Conference’),196 which was concluded by the adoption of the 1955 Hague Protocol; – International Conference on Air Law, held in Guatemala City, in February and March 1971 (hereinafter the ‘1971 Guatemala City Conference’),197 which was concluded by the adoption of the 1971 Guatemala City Proto- col; – International Conference on Air Law, held in Montreal, in September 1975 (hereinafter the ‘1975 Montreal Conference’),198 which was con- cluded by the adoption of the 1975 Additional Protocols No 1, 2 and 3 and the Montreal Protocol No 4; 194 Conférence Internationale de Droit Xxxxx Xxxxxx, 27 Octobre – 6 Novembre 1925, Paris, 1926. 195 ICAO Doc 7838, II Conférence Internationale de Droit Privé Aérien, 4-12 Octobre 1929, Procès-Verbaux, Varsovie, 1930. 196 ICAO Doc 7686, International Conference on Private Air Law, The Hague, September 1955, volume I, Minutes, Montreal September 1956; ICAO Doc 7686, International Confer- ence on Private Air Law, The Hague, September 1955, volume II, Documents, Montreal September 1956. 197 ICAO Doc 9040, International Conference on Air Law, Guatemala City, February-March 1971, volume I, Minutes, Montreal, 1972; ICAO Doc 9040, International Conference on Air Law, Guatemala City, February-March 1971, volume II, Documents, Montreal, 1972. 198 ICAO Doc 9154, International Conference on Air Law, Montreal, September 1975, volume I, Minutes, Montreal, 1977; ICAO Doc 9154, International Conference on Air Law, Montreal, September 1975, volume II, Documents, Montreal, 1977. – International Conference on Air Law, held in Montreal, in May 1999 (herein...
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Their Relevance

  • Services and Information for Persons with Limited English Proficiency A. Grantee shall take reasonable steps to provide services and information both orally and in writing, in appropriate languages other than English, to ensure that persons with limited English proficiency are effectively informed and can have meaningful access to programs, benefits and activities. Meaningful access may entail providing language assistance services, including oral interpretation and written translation, if necessary. More information can be found at xxxxx://xxx.xxx.xxx/.

  • Scope of Cooperation 1. The Authorities recognise the importance of close communication concerning the Covered CCPs and intend to cooperate regarding:

  • APPLICABILITY TO SUBCONTRACTORS Respondent agrees that all contracts it awards pursuant to the contract awarded as a result of this Agreement will be bound by the foregoing terms and conditions.

  • Submission of Grievance Information a) Upon appointment of the arbitrator, the appealing party shall within five days after notice of appointment forward to the arbitrator, with a copy to the School Board, the submission of the grievance which shall include the following:

  • Scope and Applicability 1.1 This Data Processing Agreement applies to Oracle’s Processing of Personal Information on Your behalf as a Processor for the provision of the Services specified in Your Services Agreement. Unless otherwise expressly stated in Your Services Agreement, this version of the Data Processing Agreement shall be effective and remain in force for the term of Your Services Agreement.

  • Internet Disclaimer For any Service(s) described in the Agreement utilizing the Internet, Bank does not and cannot control the flow of data to or from Bank's network and other portions of the Internet. Such flow depends in large part on the performance of Internet Services provided or controlled by third parties. Actions or inactions of such third parties can impair or disrupt your connections to the Internet (or portions thereof). Bank cannot guarantee that such events will not occur. Accordingly, Bank disclaims any and all liability resulting from or related to such events and in no event shall Bank be liable for any damages (whether in contract or in tort) that are attributable to the public Internet infrastructure, your ability to connect to the Internet, or Bank's ability to connect to the Internet on your behalf.

  • Terms of Reference of the Investigator (a) The purpose of the investigator will be to ascertain facts.

  • Scope of Project i. The work to be performed under this Agreement for the Rapid City Metropolitan Transportation Planning Process will be conducted in accordance with the CY 2018 Unified Planning Work Program incorporated in this agreement by reference as Attachment D, and the 2018 Unified Planning Work Program Amendment 2018-01, incorporated in and attached to this agreement as Attachment F.

  • Escrow Agent Not Responsible for Furnished Information The Escrow Agent will have no responsibility for seeking, obtaining, compiling, preparing or determining the accuracy of any information or document, including the representative capacity in which a party purports to act, that the Escrow Agent receives as a condition to a release from escrow or a transfer of escrow securities within escrow under this Agreement.

  • CFR PART 200 AND FEDERAL CONTRACT PROVISIONS EXPLANATION TIPS and TIPS Members will sometimes seek to make purchases with federal funds. In accordance with 2 C.F.R. Part 200 of the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (sometimes referred to as “XXXXX”),Vendor's response to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will indicate Vendor's willingness and ability to comply with certain requirements which may be applicable to TIPS purchases paid for with federal funds, if accepted by Vendor. Your responses to the following questions labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will dictate whether TIPS can list this awarded contract as viable to be considered for a federal fund purchase. Failure to certify all requirements labeled "2 CFR Part 200 or Federal Provision" will mean that your contract is listed as not viable for the receipt of federal funds. However, it will not prevent award. If you do enter into a TIPS Sale when you are accepting federal funds, the contract between you and the TIPS Member will likely require these same certifications.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.