Study Methods Clause Samples

Study Methods. Teaching Centres are provided with a detailed syllabus and reading list for each subject area. Each Unit Syllabus clearly defines the areas that you will be required to cover for each subject and your examination questions will be based on the areas and topics detailed for each unit. It is important to ensure that you obtain a copy of each unit syllabus from your Teaching Centre. Alternatively, this information can be obtained online at ▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, in the ‘Single Subject’ section. Each Unit Syllabus is normally linked to one main textbook and the examiners base their questions on the contents of the nominated core text. The Unit Syllabuses also give details of 'Alternative Texts' and texts recommended for further reading. It is advised that you should refer to the 'Alternative Texts' in order to develop your skills and broaden your knowledge of the subject area.
View SourceView Similar (8)
Study Methods. Preliminary focus groups
View Source
Study Methods. Introduction
View Source
Study Methods. All available archeological literature and the records of the Alaska Heritage Resources Survey (AHRS) were reviewed to compile information about previously recorded archaeological and historical sites. Special status sites--properties which have been determined eligible for the National Register and which might be subject to visual impacts--were defined to focus consideration on properties having particular designations reflecting agency priorities for in- place preservation or public interpretation.
View Source
Study Methods. The Institute on Human Values in Medicine (IHVM) conducted a variety of activities to support and promote the integration of humanities content into medical school curricula nationally. This study sought to identify, collect and exam original materials related to the organizational structure of the institute to ascertain how it performed its work and assess the outcomes of its activities in order to inform current, related efforts. Data was collected using a mixture of methods typical of an historical study: identification and examination of archival records from the three major library archives associated with the IHVM and several additional relevant sites; unstructured interviews were performed with experts having historical memory of IHVM; semi-­‐structured interviews with subjects directly impacted by IHVM interventions, such as trainees; collection of survey responses from schools receiving IHVM interventions; and the identification and analysis of publications and reports of the IHVM. The data extracted from these various methods and sources was used to understand the organizational structures, leadership and influence of IHVM’s activities on medical schools and legitimizing agencies of American medical education, such as the Association of American Medical Colleges (AAMC) and the Liaison Committee for Medical Education (LCME). Workshops focused on utilizing qualitative data for analysis was helpful in creating the interview schedules and analyzing content.110 The data support the predictive hypothetical model proposed in Chapter One. The project received Institute Review 110 Two workshops were attended sponsored by the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ School of Public Health, Emory University. Qualitative Research Methods Training Workshop, held August 12-­‐15, 2014 and Qualitative Data Analysis Training Workshop, held November 3-­‐4, 2014. Board (IRB) approval under Exempt status on June 22, 2016 by the Emory University IRB, Study Number IRB00087873.
View Source
Study Methods 
View SourceView Similar (3)

Related to Study Methods

  • Materials and Methods 86 2.1 PARTICIPANTS 87 We used baseline measurements from a convenience sample of participants in previous (3) and 88 ongoing cohort studies investigating the effects of rehabilitation on balance responses (Table 1). PD 89 participants were mild-moderate with bilateral symptoms (▇▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ stage 2-3 (13)). All 90 participants provided written informed consent and all study procedures were approved by Institutional 91 Review Boards at the Georgia Institute of Technology and Emory University.

  • Protocols Each party hereby agrees that the inclusion of additional protocols may be required to make this Agreement specific. All such protocols shall be negotiated, determined and agreed upon by both parties hereto.

  • Study Design This includes a discussion of the evaluation design employed including research questions and hypotheses; type of study design; impacted populations and stakeholders; data sources; and data collection; analysis techniques, including controls or adjustments for differences in comparison groups, controls for other interventions in the State and any sensitivity analyses, and limitations of the study.

  • Screening The Health Plan must work with contracted providers to conduct interperiodic EPSDT screens on RIte Care and all ACA Adult Expansion Population members under age 21 (i.e. 19 and 20-year old under this Agreement) to identify health and developmental problems in conformance with ATTACHMENT ED to this Agreement. Additional screens should be provided as Medically Necessary. At a minimum, these screens must include: • A comprehensive health and developmental history, including health education, nutrition assessment, immunization history, and developmental assessment • Immunizations according to the Rhode Island EPSDT Periodicity Schedule • An unclothed physical examination • Laboratory tests including lead, TB, and newborn screenings as medically indicated • Vision testing • Hearing testing • Dental screening oral examination by PCP as part of a comprehensive examination required before age one (1) • All other medically indicated screening services • And provide EOHHS with a list of established CPT/HCPC codes used to identify all billable services included in the EPSDT schedule.

  • Product Testing No later than [**] prior to a scheduled Delivery ARIAD US shall send to ARIAD SWISSCO the Delivery Documents for review. Following such review, unless within [**] of receipt of the Delivery Documents ARIAD SWISSCO gives written notice of rejection of the Product to be delivered, stating the reasons for such rejection, the Delivery shall proceed, and both Parties shall organize the same. Upon arrival at ARIAD SWISSCO nominated site it shall visually inspect the shipment of the Product to identify any damage to the external packaging. ARIAD SWISSCO may reject any shipment (or portion thereof) of the Product that is damaged by providing to ARIAD US reasonable evidence of damage within [**] after Delivery of such Product. If ARIAD SWISSCO does not so reject any shipment (or portion thereof) of the Product within [**] of Delivery of such Product, ARIAD SWISSCO shall be deemed to have accepted such shipment of the Product; provided, however, that in the case of the Product having any Latent Defect, ARIAD SWISSCO shall notify ARIAD US promptly once it becomes aware that a Product contains a Latent Defect and subsequently may reject such Product by giving written notice to ARIAD US of ARIAD SWISSCO’s rejection of such Product and shipping a representative sample of such Product or other evidence of Non-Conformance to ARIAD US within [**] after becoming aware of such Latent Defect, which notice shall include a description of the Latent Defect.