Selection of Concentrations in the Study Sample Clauses

Selection of Concentrations in the Study. A wide range of animal toxicology studies were conducted with RBM-007 Injectable Solution by both systemic and ocular routes. Systemic toxicity was seen only with high doses far above those doses contemplated for ocular administration. The NOAEL in GLP intravitreal monkey studies is 1 mg/eye. Using a volume of vitreous of 2.2 mL for monkey, this is a concentration of 0.45 mg/mL (Xxxxxx et al, 2013). The intended human doses for the first in human study (RBM-007-001) are 0.2 mg, 1.0 mg and 2.0 mg per eye administered once. Considering a value of human vitreous to be 5.2 mL (Xxxxx-Xxxxx, 1994), these concentrations are 0.038, 0.19 and 0.38 mg/mL for these clinical doses. Therefore, the NOAEL in monkey is 11-fold higher than the intended starting clinical dose and 1.1-fold higher than intended maximum human dose. The safety factor would have been even higher if the viscosity and injectable volume for RBM-007 Injectable Solution in animals (monkey and rabbit) were not limiting parameters. It should also be noted that the clinical protocol requires the review of safety data for each cohort (and also first patient in each cohort) by a Safety Review Team independent of Principal Investigators before escalating the clinical dose. With regard to systemic exposure, the highest concentration of RBM-007 seen in plasma after single intravitreal dosing was 1,560 ng/mL at a dose of 1 mg/eye in monkey and 65.1 ng/mL at a dose of 0.5 mg/eye (injection to both eyes at a dose of 0.5 mg/eye, total 1 mg/body) in rabbit. Toxicokinetic evaluation in GLP systemic studies in monkey suggests that blood level at which toxicity might occur is 691,000 ng/mL. Thus, even without correcting for the body weight differences between animals and humans, the safety margin is 221–5,307 at the maximum dose of 2.0 mg/eye for human. If the body weight for animals is taken into account (rabbit and monkey at 3 Kg and human at 70 Kg.), the safety margin is 5,156–123,830. Thus, the Sponsor contends that the preclinical toxicology studies support the planned clinical studies.‌‌
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Selection of Concentrations in the Study

  • Selection of projects and financial parameters 4.1 Open calls and availability of funds (including number of calls, duration of calls, and estimated size):

  • VISIBILITY OF FUNDING FROM THE OFFICIAL DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE Unless the SAIDC requests or agrees otherwise, any communication or publication made by the Final Beneficiary that relates to the action, including at conferences, seminars or in any information or promotional materials (such as brochures, leaflets, posters, presentations in electronic form, etc.), including tangible assets acquired from the project must: (a) indicate that the action has received funding from the Official Development Assistance, SlovakAid and (b) display the SlovakAid logo. When displayed in association with another logo, the SlovakAid logo must have appropriate prominence. The obligation to display the SlovakAid logo does not confer on the Final Beneficiary a right of exclusive use. The Final Beneficiary may not appropriate the SlovakAid logo or any similar trademark or logo, either by registration or by any other means. For the purposes of the first, second and third subparagraphs and under the conditions specified therein, the Final Beneficiary may use the SlovakAid logo without first obtaining permission from the SAIDC.

  • Application and Selection (1) Application for professional development leave shall contain an appropriate outline of the project or work to be accomplished during the leave.

  • Specific Order Processes and Requirements 1. Distributor will order Software from SAP using and filling out completely such forms and minimum order requirements as SAP may prescribe from time to time and must comply with any then-current order process for the specific Software product. Where applicable, Distributor agrees to use the electronic means provided by SAP for placing orders.

  • Distribution of UDP and TCP queries DNS probes will send UDP or TCP “DNS test” approximating the distribution of these queries.

  • Limitations in Tariffs A Party may, in its sole discretion, provide in its tariffs and contracts with its End Users and third parties that relate to any service, product or function provided or contemplated under this Agreement, that to the maximum extent permitted by Applicable Law, such Party shall not be liable to the End User or third Party for (i) any loss relating to or arising out of this Agreement, whether in contract, tort or otherwise, that exceeds the amount such Party would have charged that applicable person for the service, product or function that gave rise to such loss and (ii)

  • Sale of Note; Change of Loan Servicer; Notice of Grievance The Note or a partial interest in the Note (together with this Security Instrument) can be sold one or more times without prior notice to Borrower. A sale might result in a change in the entity (known as the “Loan Servicer”) that collects Periodic Payments due under the Note and this Security Instrument and performs other mortgage loan servicing obligations under the Note, this Security Instrument, and Applicable Law. There also might be one or more changes of the Loan Servicer unrelated to a sale of the Note. If there is a change of the Loan Servicer, Borrower will be given written notice of the change which will state the name and address of the new Loan Servicer, the address to which payments should be made and any other information RESPA requires in connection with a notice of transfer of servicing. If the Note is sold and thereafter the Loan is serviced by a Loan Servicer other than the purchaser of the Note, the mortgage loan servicing obligations to Borrower will remain with the Loan Servicer or be transferred to a successor Loan Servicer and are not assumed by the Note purchaser unless otherwise provided by the Note purchaser. Neither Borrower nor Lender may commence, join, or be joined to any judicial action (as either an individual litigant or the member of a class) that arises from the other party’s actions pursuant to this Security Instrument or that alleges that the other party has breached any provision of, or any duty owed by reason of, this Security Instrument, until such Borrower or Lender has notified the other party (with such notice given in compliance with the requirements of Section 15) of such alleged breach and afforded the other party hereto a reasonable period after the giving of such notice to take corrective action. If Applicable Law provides a time period which must elapse before certain action can be taken, that time period will be deemed to be reasonable for purposes of this paragraph. The notice of acceleration and opportunity to cure given to Borrower pursuant to Section 22 and the notice of acceleration given to Borrower pursuant to Section 18 shall be deemed to satisfy the notice and opportunity to take corrective action provisions of this Section 20.

  • Monitoring of Contribution Limitations Information The Custodian shall not be responsible for monitoring the amount of contributions made to the designated beneficiary’s account or the income levels of any depositor or contributor for purposes of assuring compliance with applicable state or federal tax laws.

  • Commercial Purposes Borrower intends to use the Loan proceeds solely for business or commercial related purposes.

  • Certification Regarding Prohibition of Certain Terrorist Organizations (Tex Gov. Code 2270) Vendor certifies that Vendor is not a company identified on the Texas Comptroller’s list of companies known to have contracts with, or provide supplies or services to, a foreign organization designated as a Foreign Terrorist Organization by the U.S. Secretary of State. Does Vendor certify? 3 Yes

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.