Pavement Evaluation Sample Clauses

Pavement Evaluation. Not in contract.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Pavement Evaluation. The Consultant will perform a brief visual assessment only of the pavement at the bridge approaches. The Consultant will describe the approach pavement condition in the design report.
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. GEOCON will evaluate existing pavement and subgrade conditions by performing pavement coring along Xxxxxx Field Road from Folsom Boulevard to the Xxxxxx Field Road and International Drive intersection and provide conclusions and recommendations for repair and/or rehabilitation. Rehabilitation will likely include isolated dig outs and grind/overlay with or without a pavement reinforcement interlayer. GEOCON will perform the following services: Scope of Services ‐ Xxxxxx Field Rehabilitation Contract No. 000-0000-0  A GEOCON senior staff engineer will perform a site visit to observe existing pavement conditions and to pre‐xxxx proposed core locations.  Notify subscribing utility companies via Underground Service Alert (USA) a minimum of two working days (as required by law) prior to performing exploratory excavations at the site.  Obtain an encroachment permit from the City of Rancho Xxxxxxx (assume no fee).  Perform up to 8 pavement cores within the northbound and southbound lanes of Xxxxxx Field Road. Four (4) cores each will be located north and south of US Highway 50 in the northbound and southbound lanes.  Provide necessary traffic control measures during fieldwork.  Measure existing pavement section material thicknesses at the core locations.  Obtain subgrade soil samples from the core locations.  Patch the cores with rapid‐set concrete or cold‐patch asphalt concrete (AC).
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. The ENGINEER shall perform a network level investigation to review the pavement inventory from the Pavement Management Information System (PMIS) condition data and to provide high-level assessment of the needs of the pavement sections along the corridor. The network level evaluation shall be based on data collected at the network level by TxDOT as part of the PMIS and is intended for planning, and high-level assessment of the pavement needs. The STATE will provide the following data in a spreadsheet or other usable format for the Engineer’s use in the Pavement Evaluation task:  Corridor pavement Inventory, including PMIS pavement segmentation, pavement types, dimension, number of lanes, etc. within each segment ;  Most recent pavement distress survey and other information from PMIS; DocuSign Envelope ID: 9E4E3B84-8519-409C-AEF8-0383FB0D2E89  Available pavement construction history and maintenance records;  Falling Weight Deflectometer (FWD) results, recent coring reports, or pavement thicknesses based on GPR reports (if available); and  International Roughness Index (IRI) survey results from the PMIS The ENGINEER shall perform the following subtasks:  Data Review: TxDOT’s PMIS contains a database of the pavement roadway inventory and pavement condition survey data updated annually. The ENGINEER shall review the PMIS inventory and pavement condition. In addition, the ENGINEER shall review construction and maintenance records provided by the STATE.
Sample 1
Pavement Evaluation. With the pavement image collection started, DTS will begin processing pavement images immediately to continue on a prompt delivery. This allows DTS to begin the pavement distress rating process concurrent with the image collection. DTS’ pavement line scan images allow the pavement evaluator to determine the type, extent and severity of pavement distresses. DTS will also use industry standard Crack Scope software to map specific pavement distresses. Longitudinal, transverse and alligator (fatigue) distresses will be initially identified with this automated pavement distress processing software. This software provides an automated distress map of these distresses on each pavement image. Once pavement images and distress mapping processing is complete for each collection day, DTS' experienced pavement evaluators will review each street segment image for a complete and thorough evaluation of the existing pavement condition per the ASTM D6433 pavement distress rating process. DTS' pavement evaluators have the ability to modify, delete or add to the longitudinal, transverse and alligator distress map at any time during the rating process utilizing DTS' remote sensing software EarthShaper™.
Sample 1

Related to Pavement Evaluation

  • Student Evaluation A. All unit members shall be subject to student evaluations each semester in each course taught.

  • Student Evaluations Student evaluations shall be completed by the end of the 12th week of the Fall semester.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Institute’s determination of bid’s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order.

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • Independent Evaluation Buyer is experienced and knowledgeable in the oil and gas business. Buyer has been advised by and has relied solely on its own expertise and legal, tax, accounting, marketing, land, engineering, environmental and other professional counsel concerning this transaction, the Subject Property and value thereof.

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • JOB EVALUATION The work of the provincial job evaluation steering committee (the JE Committee) will continue during the term of this Framework Agreement. The objectives of the JE Committee are as follows: • Review the results of the phase one and phase two pilots and outcomes of the committee work. Address any anomalies identified with the JE tool, process, or benchmarks. • Rate the provincial benchmarks and create a job hierarchy for the provincial benchmarks. • Gather data from all school districts and match existing job descriptions to the provincial benchmarks. • Identify the job hierarchy for local job descriptions for all school districts. • Compare the local job hierarchy to the benchmark-matched hierarchy. • Develop a methodology to convert points to pay bands - The confirmed method must be supported by current compensation best practices. • Identify training requirements to support implementation of the JE plan and develop training resources as required. Once the objectives outlined above are completed, the JE Committee will mutually determine whether a local, regional or provincial approach to the steps outlined above is appropriate. It is recognized that the work of the committee is technical, complicated, lengthy and onerous. To accomplish the objectives, the parties agree that existing JE funds can be accessed by the JE committee to engage consultant(s) to complete this work. It is further recognized that this process does not impact the established management right of employers to determine local job requirements and job descriptions nor does this process alter any existing collective agreement rights or established practices. When the JE plan is ready to be implemented, and if an amendment to an existing collective agreement is required, the JE Committee will work with the local School District and Local Union to make recommendations for implementation. Any recommendations will also be provided to the Provincial Labour Management Committee (PLMC). As mutually agreed by the provincial parties and the JE Committee, the disbursement of available JE funds shall be retroactive to January 2, 2020. The committee will utilize available funds to provide 50% of the wage differential for the position falling the furthest below the wage rate established by the provincial JE process and will continue this process until all JE fund monies at the time have been disbursed. The committee will follow compensation best practices to avoid problems such as inversion. The committee will report out to the provincial parties regularly during the term of the Framework Agreement. Should any concerns arise during the work of the committee they will be referred to the PLMC. Create a maintenance program to support ongoing implementation of the JE plan at a local, regional or provincial level. The maintenance program will include a process for addressing the wage rates of incumbents in positions which are impacted by implementation of the JE plan. The provincial parties confirm that $4,419,859 of ongoing annual funds will be used to implement the Job Evaluation Plan. Effective July 1, 2022, there will be a one-time pause of the annual $4,419,859 JE funding. This amount has been allocated to the local table bargaining money. The annual funding will recommence July 1, 2023.

  • Specialist Schools Allowance Funding equivalent to that which a maintained school with the Academy's characteristics would receive in respect of their participation in the specialist schools programme. In the year of conversion, this may continue to be paid by the Local Authority;

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.