Overview of incentives and barriers for market actors in each model Sample Clauses

Overview of incentives and barriers for market actors in each model. Possible incentives/opportunities and barriers/threats for market actors can be summarized in the following tables for each model in Germany and Japan. Germany and Japan: Model G1 and J4 - J7: controlled P2P network: The wholesale market model Type of market actor Incentives and opportunities Barriers and threats Small to medium generator or prosumer ⋅ If the P2P trading cost is lower than the cost/price of the traditional supply chain, the difference could be shared between the generator and the customer, leading to higher revenues for the generator (cf. Lition claims in Germany, KEPCO in Japan) ⋅ In this way, P2P trading could create new Incentives for continuous selling of renewable electricity from post-FIT plants and for investment for a new renewable plant without FIP/MP payment in a post-FIT era ⋅ Providers of P2P electricity are in the direct competition with traditional suppliers, so expected P2P revenue may not exceed the price of conventional generation and marketing. ⋅ A further price premium for the producer would probably only possible for green electricity but not for ‘grey’ electricity, since neither a rational nor an emotional added value for the electricity customer can be expected from P2P trading itself. ⋅ There is an uncertainty, if the prices obtained from customers will be higher than from the wholesale power market, particularly if the smart contracts are made using fixed or other predetermined prices. Wholesale trade company, ⋅ VPP operators may organize P2P ⋅ The direct P2P trading will reduce their
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Overview of incentives and barriers for market actors in each model

  • Technical Standards Applicable to a Wind Generating Plant i. Low Voltage Ride-Through (LVRT) Capability A wind generating plant shall be able to remain online during voltage disturbances up to the time periods and associated voltage levels set forth in the standard below. The LVRT standard provides for a transition period standard and a post-transition period standard.

  • Visitors to and Conduct on School Property Petitions or written correspondence to the Board shall be presented to the Board in the next regular Board packet. LEGAL REF.: 5 ILCS 120/2.06, Open Meetings Act. 105 ILCS 5/10-6 and 5/10-16. CROSS REF.: 2:220 (School Board Meeting Procedure), 8:10 (Connection with the Community), 8:30 (Visitors to and Conduct on School Property) Adopted: September 5, 2019 Meridian CUSD 223 2:240 Board Policy Development The School Board governs using written policies. Written policies ensure legal compliance, establish Board processes, articulate District ends, delegate authority, and define operating limits. Board policies also provide the basis for monitoring progress toward District ends. Policy Development Anyone may propose new policies, changes to existing policies, or elimination of existing policies. Staff suggestions should be processed through the Superintendent. Suggestions from all others should be made to the Board President or the Superintendent. A Board Policy Committee will consider all policy suggestions, and provide information and recommendations to the Board. The Superintendent is responsible for: (1) providing relevant policy information and data to the Board,

  • Reporting of Total Compensation of Subrecipient Executives I. Applicability and what to report. Unless you are exempt as provided in paragraph [4.]of this award term, for each first-tier subrecipient under this award, you shall report the names and total compensation of each of the subrecipient's five most highly compensated executives for the subrecipient's preceding completed fiscal year, if—

  • DEVELOPMENT OR ASSISTANCE IN DEVELOPMENT OF SPECIFICATIONS REQUIREMENTS/ STATEMENTS OF WORK Firms and/or individuals that assisted in the development or drafting of the specifications, requirements, statements of work, or solicitation documents contained herein are excluded from competing for this solicitation. This shall not be applicable to firms and/or individuals providing responses to a publicly posted Request for Information (RFI) associated with a solicitation.

  • Appropriate Technical and Organizational Measures SAP has implemented and will apply the technical and organizational measures set forth in Appendix 2. Customer has reviewed such measures and agrees that as to the Cloud Service selected by Customer in the Order Form the measures are appropriate taking into account the state of the art, the costs of implementation, nature, scope, context and purposes of the processing of Personal Data.

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing Permitted Testing is permitted where the Employer has reasonable suspicion to believe.

  • Technical Objections to Grievances It is the intent of both Parties of this Agreement that no grievance shall be defeated merely because of a technical error, other than time limitations in processing the grievance through the grievance procedure. To this end, an arbitration board shall have the power to allow all necessary amendments to the grievance and the power to waive formal procedural irregularities in the processing of a grievance, in order to determine the real matter in dispute and to render a decision according to equitable principles and the justice of the case.

  • District’s Evaluation of Consultant and Consultant’s Employees and/or Subcontractors The District may evaluate the Consultant in any way the District is entitled pursuant to applicable law. The District’s evaluation may include, without limitation:

  • Drug and Alcohol Testing – Safety-Sensitive Functions A. Employees required to have a Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) are subject to pre-employment, post-accident, random and reasonable suspicion testing in accordance with the U.S. Department of Transportation rules, Coast Guard Regulations (46 CFR Part 16) or the Federal Omnibus Transportation Employee Testing Act of 1991. The testing will be conducted in accordance with current Employer policy.

  • Technical and Organizational Measures The following sections define SAP’s current technical and organizational measures. SAP may change these at any time without notice so long as it maintains a comparable or better level of security. Individual measures may be replaced by new measures that serve the same purpose without diminishing the security level protecting Personal Data.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.