Overall Affordability Clause Samples

The Overall Affordability clause sets a requirement that the total cost of a product, service, or project must remain within a specified budget or financial threshold. In practice, this clause may require regular cost assessments, budget reviews, or adjustments to scope to ensure that expenses do not exceed agreed-upon limits. Its core function is to protect parties from unexpected financial burdens by ensuring that the undertaking remains financially manageable and within planned resources.
Overall Affordability. NHS Lothian operates with a delegated authority over capital schemes of less than £5m. As the estimated costs for this project are above that delegated limit, the project will be referred to the Scottish Government Capital Investment Group for approval and specific funding of capital costs. Capital affordability will be determined through prioritisation within the Scottish Government capital programme, with availability of specific capital funding a key constraint. Should the IA be approved, revenue affordability will be assessed in detail at the OBC stage following a full review of revenue implications.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Overall Affordability. 7.11.1 It is anticipated that the recurring revenue funding from the current facilities, which has been identified as £290k, will be made available to support the new facility if the IA is implemented. 7.11.2 Further development of the revenue implications will be undertaken in the development of the OBC, including energy efficiencies and reduced maintenance arising from a new build. 7.11.3 It is also expected that by implementation of the proposals contained in the IA, Non Recurring costs in respect of significant backlog maintenance will be avoided. Backlog associated with the ‘Do Minimum’ and to make the premises fit for purpose has been identified as £900K in the NHS Greater Glasgow & ▇▇▇▇▇ Property and Asset Management Strategy 2012-2016. Figure based on a BCIS refurbishment m2 rate. 7.11.4 The figures within the ‘Do Minimum’ option on the indicative capital cost table above exclude fees, decant, double running and other enabling costs.
View Source
Overall Affordability. The capital costs detailed above are predicted to be funded through traditional capital funding through a specific allocation from the Scottish Government. This project has been prioritised by NHS Lothian and the West Lothian Health and Social Care Partnership. The estimated capital costs noted above are included in the NHS Lothian Property and Asset Five Year Investment Plan. Increases in facilities costs will be met proportionally by the services using the space. It is therefore anticipated that increases will be met by GP Services (reimbursed via GMS) and WL HSCP for non-GP related element – exact splits are yet to be concluded. Depreciation will be funded by the existing NHS Lothian Depreciation budget. Service Change Planning Strategic Assessment Initial Agreement Outline Business Case Final BusinessCase Implementation Phase
View Source
Overall Affordability. Recurring revenue funding of £480k has been identified from the current resources to support the running of the new facility if the IA is implemented. Further examination of efficiencies and revenue release will be undertaken in the development of the OBC. This will examine: • Efficiencies from the provision of integrated services • Reduced running cost of energy efficient facility • Reduced cleaning cost within a modern building • Reduced costs in respect of maintenance within hard facilities management • Efficiencies in non clinical support Non recurring costs in respect of significant backlog maintenance will be avoided. Backlog associated with ‘Do Minimum‘ & to make premises fit for purpose has been identified as £1-£1.2m in the NHS Greater Glasgow & ▇▇▇▇▇ Property & Asset Management Strategy 2012 -2016 - figure based on a BCIS refurbishment m2 rate. The figures within the “Do Minimum” option on the indicative capital cost table above excludes fees, decant, double running and other enabling costs.
View Source
Overall Affordability. Given the availability of capital funding at a national level, a revenue finance solution is the way to deliver this project. Initial modelling to review the affordability of the first phase indicates that it would be affordable in revenue terms, as the savings arising from bed reductions would offset the impact of the unitary charge. A contribution from the Scottish Government towards the unitary charge has been assumed based on the letter dated 22nd March 2011 sent to NHS Board Chief Executives from Acting Director-General Health and Social Care and Chief Executive NHS Scotland, ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇. Further phases will be progressed when affordability is tested through the Outline Business Case process.
View Source

Related to Overall Affordability

  • Sustainability (12 /18) Pursuant to the City’s Sustainable City Principles, which direct City Bureaus to pursue long-term social equity, environmental quality, and economic vitality through innovative and traditional mechanisms, Contractor is encouraged to incorporate these Principles into its scope of work with the City wherever possible. Therefore, in accordance with the Principles and the City's Sustainable Procurement Policy, it is the policy of the City of Portland to encourage the use of Products or Services that help to minimize the human health and environmental impacts of City operations. Contractor is encouraged to incorporate environmentally preferable Products or Services into its work performance wherever possible. "Environmentally preferable" means Products or Services that have a lesser or reduced effect on human health and the environment when compared with competing products or services that serve the same purpose. This comparison may consider raw materials acquisition, production, manufacturing, packaging, distribution, reuse, operation, maintenance, or disposal of the Product or Service.

  • Vulnerability Management BNY Mellon will maintain a documented process to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities affecting its systems used to provide the services. BNY Mellon will classify security vulnerabilities using industry recognized standards and conduct continuous monitoring and testing of its networks, hardware and software including regular penetration testing and ethical hack assessments. BNY Mellon will remediate identified security vulnerabilities in accordance with its process.

  • Rehabilitation Program The company agrees to the implementation of an agreed worker’s compensation rehabilitation policy. The operation of this policy shall be reviewed on a regular basis. The parties commit to ensuring that the rehabilitation of injured workers is an accepted practice, and that suitable duties are provided when available. No employee will be terminated whilst on workers compensation during the first 12 months without prior consultation with the union. The parties agree that the person responsible for the management of rehabilitation cases must be adequately trained to do the job. If such a person is not available within the company, then the services of an agreed building industry rehabilitation coordination service will be used. The parties to this Agreement shall ensure that any employee who sustains a work related injury, illness or disease, will be afforded every assistance in utilising a rehabilitation program aimed at returning that employee to meaningful employment within the industry.

  • Summer Session A. All ASEs employed in the Summer Session shall receive the same general range adjustment as ASEs received in the preceding Fall term. B. The following articles apply to ASEs who are employed in the summer session: Recognition, Wages (range adjustment only), DCP, Travel, Health and Safety, Leaves, Holidays, Duration, Workspace and Instructional Support, Parking, Grievance and Arbitration, Waiver, Management and Academic Rights, No Strikes, Non-Discrimination, Union Access and Rights, Union Security, Discipline and Dismissal, Emergency Layoff, Employment Files and Evaluations, Definitions, Severability, Labor-Management Meetings, and Classifications. C. The remainder of the articles in the agreement does not apply to ASEs who are employed in the summer session. D. The topic of Summer Session, and effects of changes on terms and conditions of employment for ASEs employed in Summer Session, shall be reopened for bargaining commencing no later than January 2, 2001.

  • Quality Management Grantee will: 1. comply with quality management requirements as directed by the System Agency. 2. develop and implement a Quality Management Plan (QMP) that conforms with 25 TAC § 448.504 and make the QMP available to System Agency upon request. The QMP must be developed no later than the end of the first quarter of the Contract term. 3. update and revise the QMP each biennium or sooner, if necessary. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s governing body will review and approve the initial QMP, within the first quarter of the Contract term, and each updated and revised QMP thereafter. The QMP must describe ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇’s methods to measure, assess, and improve - i. Implementation of evidence-based practices, programs and research-based approaches to service delivery; ii. Client/participant satisfaction with the services provided by ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇; iii. Service capacity and access to services; iv. Client/participant continuum of care; and v. Accuracy of data reported to the state. 4. participate in continuous quality improvement (CQI) activities as defined and scheduled by the state including, but not limited to data verification, performing self-reviews; submitting self-review results and supporting documentation for the state’s desk reviews; and participating in the state’s onsite or desk reviews. 5. submit plan of improvement or corrective action plan and supporting documentation as requested by System Agency. 6. participate in and actively pursue CQI activities that support performance and outcomes improvement. 7. respond to consultation recommendations by System Agency, which may include, but are not limited to the following: i. Staff training; ii. Self-monitoring activities guided by System Agency, including use of quality management tools to self-identify compliance issues; and iii. Monitoring of performance reports in the System Agency electronic clinical management system.