Online Faculty Evaluations Clause Samples

The Online Faculty Evaluations clause establishes the process and requirements for conducting faculty performance assessments through digital platforms. Typically, this clause outlines the frequency of evaluations, the parties responsible for administering and completing them, and the types of feedback or metrics to be collected. By formalizing the use of online tools for evaluations, the clause ensures a standardized, efficient, and accessible method for gathering input on faculty performance, thereby promoting accountability and continuous improvement.
Online Faculty Evaluations.ย 1. Observations of faculty teaching online classes shall be conducted at a scheduled time. CCA and the District agree to work with College Instructional Technology so online evaluators shall be limited to a set time to observe the class site, just as evaluators of face- to-face classes are limited to a set time. The time for evaluators to observe an online class shall not exceed that of an evaluator observing a face-to-face class.
View SourceView Similar (5)
Online Faculty Evaluations.ย โ€Œ 1. Observations of faculty teaching online classes shall be conducted at a scheduled time. CCA and the District agree to work with College Instructional Technology so online evaluators will be limited to a set time to observe the class site, just as evaluators of face-to-face classes are limited to a set time. The time for evaluators to observe an online class shall not exceed that of an evaluator observing a face-to-face class. Checklist of Full-time Faculty Evaluation Guidelines and Forms 46 Agreement between KCCD & KCCD CCA/CTA/NEA July 1, 2023 through June 30, 2026 ๐ŸžŽ Form A/FT: Coversheet for the Faculty Evaluation Process ๐ŸžŽ Form Q/FT: Administrative Assessment Review Below is a checklist of the additional forms that shall be included in the Mode A and Mode B Comprehensive evaluation according to faculty assignment. Mode B Brief adds only the Student Evaluation Forms to the forms above. ๐ŸžŽ PGA/FT: Professional Goals and Accomplishments ๐ŸžŽ B/FT: Materials Review and Classroom Instruction Observation ๐ŸžŽ E/FT: Student Evaluation for Instructional Faculty ๐ŸžŽ PGA/FT: Professional Goals and Accomplishments ๐ŸžŽ E/FT: Student Evaluation for Instructional Faculty ๐ŸžŽ PGA/FT: Professional Goals and Accomplishments ๐ŸžŽ B/FT: Materials Review and Classroom Instruction Observation ๐ŸžŽ G/FT: Materials Review and Open Lab Activity Observation ๐ŸžŽ H/FT: Student Evaluation for Open Lab Faculty ๐ŸžŽ PGA/FT: Professional Goals and Accomplishments ๐ŸžŽ C/FT: Materials Review and Online Instruction Observation ๐ŸžŽ F/FT: Student Evaluation for Online Instructional Faculty ๐ŸžŽ L/FT: Student Evaluation for Non-Instructional Faculty ๏ฟฝ๏ฟฝ I/FT: Student Consent Form for Observation of Faculty/Student Interaction ๐ŸžŽ J/FT: Observation for Counseling/Non- Instructional Faculty ๐ŸžŽ P/FT: Faculty Service Surveys that reflect the full range for faculty service ๐ŸžŽ M/FT: Observation form for Library Faculty ๐ŸžŽ N/FT: Student Evaluation for Library Faculty ๐ŸžŽ J/FT: Observation for Counseling/Non- Instructional Faculty ๐ŸžŽ I/FT: Student Consent Form for Observation of Faculty/Student Interaction ๐ŸžŽ K/FT: Student Evaluation for Counseling Faculty ๐ŸžŽ P/FT: Faculty Service Surveys that reflect the full range of reassigned service ๐ŸžŽ O/FT: Faculty Director Evaluation ๐ŸžŽ R-1/FT: Mode A Remediation Plan ๐ŸžŽ R-2/FT: Mode A Remediation Plan Report ๐ŸžŽ S-1/FT: Mode C Remediation Plan ๐ŸžŽ S-2/FT: Mode C Remediation Plan Report Instructional / Non-Instructional Faculty who have Submitted Notice of Retirement ๐ŸžŽ Mode R/FT/ADJ: Faculty Self-Eval...
View Source

Related to Online Faculty Evaluations

  • Annual Evaluations The purpose of the annual evaluation is to assess and communicate the nature and extent of an employee's performance of assigned duties consistent with the criteria specified below in this Policy. Except for those employees who have received notice of non-reappointment pursuant to the BOT- UFF Policy on Non- reappointment, every employee shall be evaluated at least once annually. Personnel decisions shall take such annual evaluations into account, provided that such decisions need not be based solely on written faculty performance evaluations.

  • Self-Evaluation Each regular faculty member shall provide a self-evaluation. It shall address, among other items, the faculty member's fulfillment of professional responsibilities as referenced in Section 18.2.3 and an assessment of his or her own performance. The faculty member will share the self-evaluation with the Faculty Evaluation Committee and the first-level manager or designee. The self-evaluation will become part of the evaluation report.

  • JOC EVALUATION If any materials being utilized for a project cannot be found in the RS Means Price Book, this question is what is the markup percentage on those materials? When answering this question please insert the number that represents your percentage of proposed markup. Example: if you are proposing a 30 percent markup, please insert the number "30". Remember that this is a ceiling markup. You may markup a lesser percentage to the TIPS Member customer when pricing the project, but not a greater percentage. EXAMPLE: You need special materials that are not in the RS Means Unit Price Book for a project. You would buy the materials and โ–‡โ–‡โ–‡โ–‡ them up to the TIPS Member customer by the percentage you propose in this question. If the materials cost you, the contractor, $100 and you proposed a markup on this question for the material of 30 percent, then you would charge the TIPS Member customer $130 for the materials. TIPS/ESC Region 8 is required by Texas Government Code ยง 791 to be compensated for its work and thus, failure to agree shall render your response void and it will not be considered. Vendor agrees to remit to TIPS the required administration fee or, if resellers are named, guarantee the fee remittance by or for the reseller named by the vendor?

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • TECHNICAL EVALUATION (a) Detailed technical evaluation shall be carried out by Purchase Committee pursuant to conditions in the tender document to determine the substantial responsiveness of each tender. For this clause, the substantially responsive bid is one that conforms to all the eligibility and terms and condition of the tender without any material deviation. The Instituteโ€™s determination of bidโ€™s responsiveness is to be based on the contents of the bid itself without recourse to extrinsic evidence. The Institute shall evaluate the technical bids also to determine whether they are complete, whether required sureties have been furnished, whether the documents have been properly signed and whether the bids are in order. (b) The technical evaluation committee may call the responsive bidders for discussion or presentation to facilitate and assess their understanding of the scope of work and its execution. However, the committee shall have sole discretion to call for discussion / presentation. (c) Financial bids of only those bidders who qualify the technical criteria will be opened provided all other requirements are fulfilled. (d) AIIMS Jodhpur shall have right to accept or reject any or all tenders without assigning any reasons thereof.