MISTAKE OF LAW Sample Clauses

MISTAKE OF LAW. As to existence One or both contracting parties believe that a fact exists when in reality it does not or vice versa; One or both contracting parties arrive at an erroneous conclusion regarding the interpretation of a question of law or legal effects of a certain act or transaction;
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
MISTAKE OF LAW. That which arises from an ignorance of some provisions of law, or from an erroneous interpretation of its meaning, or from an erroneous conclusion as to the legal effect of an agreement, on the part of one of the parties (De Xxxx, 564).
MISTAKE OF LAW. That which arises from an ignorance of some provisions of law, or from an erroneous interpretation of its meaning, or from an erroneous conclusion as to the legal effect of an agreement, on the part of one of the parties (De Xxxx, 564). General Rule Mistake of law will not vitiate consent. Ignorantia legis non excusat.
MISTAKE OF LAW.  In some states, when the mutual mistake is about the applicable law, the contract is still valid.  Example: if both parties to a sale of land mistakenly believe that local zoning laws permit construction of duplexes on the lot, the contract would be valid though there was a mutual mistake. This is because all persons are presumed to know the law.  In other states, unilateral mistakes generally have no effect upon the contractual rights of the parties.  In other states, mutual mistakes create the right to rescind or void the contract. WHAT IS MISREPRESENTATION?  In many contract negotiations, the parties make statements that turn out to be untrue.  innocent misrepresentationa party to a contract does not know that a statement he or she made is untrue. the contract is voidable.  Example: When selling a car, the seller might say that the car has 70,000 miles on it when it actually has 150,000 miles. The seller didn’t know the true mileage because a prior owner replaced the odometer.  fraudulent misrepresentationa party to a contract knows that a statement he or she made is untrue. the contract is voidable.  Example: The seller of a car knew that the car had 150,000 miles on it, but told the buyer it had 50,000 miles.  Statements are treated as misrepresentations only if:

Related to MISTAKE OF LAW

  • Conflict of Law In the event that any of the terms or conditions of this Agreement are contrary to or unenforceable by reason of any law or governmental decision, ruling or regulation, such terms or conditions shall be deemed to be severed from this Agreement, and the illegality or unenforceability thereof shall not in any manner affect or impair any other terms or conditions of this Agreement.

  • Application of Law The Lessee shall comply with all laws, ordinances, regulations, and other legal requirements affecting the Premises and the use thereof, and the Lessee shall indemnify, defend, and hold the Lessor harmless from expense or damage resulting from failure to do so.

  • Requirement of Law As to any Person, the certificate of incorporation and by-laws or other organizational or governing documents of such Person, and any law, treaty, rule or regulation or determination of an arbitrator or a court or other Governmental Authority, in each case applicable to or binding upon such Person or any of its property or to which such Person or any of its property is subject.

  • Change of Law In this Agreement, unless the context otherwise requires, references to a statutory provision include references to that statutory provision as from time to time amended, extended or re- enacted and any regulations made under it, provided that in the event that the amendment, extension or re-enactment of any statutory provision or introduction of any new statutory provision has a material impact on the obligations of either Party, the Parties will negotiate in good faith to agree such amendments to this Agreement as may be appropriate in the circumstances. If, within a reasonable period of time, the Supplier/Service Provider and Transnet cannot reach agreement on the nature of the changes required or on modification of Prices, delivery schedules, warranties, or other terms and conditions, either Party may seek to have the matter determined in accordance with clause 32 [Dispute Resolution] above.

  • Valid Choice of Law The choice of laws of the State of New York as the governing law of this Agreement is a valid choice of law under the laws of such Selling Stockholder’s jurisdiction of organization (if other than the United States) and will be honored by the courts of such Selling Stockholder’s jurisdiction of organization (if other than the United States). The Selling Stockholder has the power to submit, and pursuant to Section 18(c) of this Agreement, has legally, validly, effectively and irrevocably submitted, to the personal jurisdiction of each New York State and United States federal court sitting in the City of New York and has validly and irrevocably waived any objection to the laying of venue of any suit, action or proceeding brought in such court.

  • Choice of Law The validity, interpretation, construction and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California.

  • Violation of Law No change shall have occurred after the date of this Agreement in any applicable Law that makes it a violation of Law for (a) Owner, any Applicable Pass Through Trustee, Subordination Agent or Mortgagee to execute, deliver and perform the Operative Agreements to which any of them is a party or (b) any Applicable Pass Through Trustee to make the loan contemplated by Section 2.1, to acquire an Equipment Note or to realize the benefits of the security afforded by the Trust Indenture.

  • Conflict of Laws The provisions of this Agreement shall be subject to all applicable statutes, laws, rules and regulations, including, without limitation, the applicable provisions of the ICA and rules and regulations promulgated thereunder. To the extent that any provision contained herein conflicts with any such applicable provision of law or regulation, the latter shall control. The terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be interpreted and defined in a manner consistent with the provisions and definitions of the ICA. If any provision of this Agreement shall be held or made invalid by a court decision, statute, rule or otherwise, the remainder of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect and shall not be affected by such invalidity.

  • Jurisdiction of Law The laws of the State of Minnesota shall govern the validity, construction and effect of this contract, unless said laws are superseded by, or in conflict with applicable federal laws and/or federal regulations. This contract will be binding upon the parties, their heirs, beneficiaries, and devisees of the parties hereto. The parties agree that Hennepin County, Minnesota is the appropriate forum for any action relating to this contract. This contract may be signed in counterparts.

  • Observance of Law Tenant shall not use the Premises or permit anything to be done in or about the Premises which will in any way conflict with any law, statute, ordinance or governmental rule or regulation now in force or which may hereafter be enacted or promulgated. Tenant shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly comply with all laws, statutes, ordinances and governmental rules, regulations or requirements now in force or which may hereafter be in force, and with the requirements of any board of fire insurance underwriters or other similar bodies now or hereafter constituted, relating to, or affecting the condition, use or occupancy of the Premises, excluding structural changes not related to or affected by Tenant's improvements or acts. The judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction or the admission of Tenant in any action against Tenant, whether Landlord is a party thereto or not, that Tenant has violated any law, ordinance or governmental rule, regulation or requirement, shall be conclusive of that fact as between Landlord and Tenant.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.