Literatures of the bidirectional option contract Sample Clauses

Literatures of the bidirectional option contract. Option contract can give the chance for the retailer with the adjustability of an initial order. They can adjust and handle well the demand volatility and it will not burden the supplier. In addition, the option contract is normally characterized by two parameters. They are the option price and the exercise price. There are basically three option contracts. They can be classified based on the exercised option directions. The contracts names are ‘the call option’, ‘the put option’, and ‘the put and call option’ or ‘the bidirectional option’ contracts. A single-period two-stage supply chain is studied by Xxxx and Xxxx (2006). It is under put and call option contract from the buyer’s perspective. The demand is under the uniformly distributed demand. In this research, the supply chain can be significantly coordinated. Furthermore, sensitivity analysis to investigate how the parameters affect the buy’s behavior is conducted. However, the study does not investigate the whole supply chain’s profits. Xxxxxxx and Xxxxxxx (2009) study the bidirectional option contract. The contract is used for a single-period two-stage supply chain under the normal distributed demand. It investigates the general case of one retailer and multiple suppliers with different contracts. It also includes one retailer and one supplier with an option contract, using simulation approach. Depending on information sharing and negotiation conversion rate between partners, the option contract increases the benefit for both of them as well as for the whole chain. Xxxx et al. (2010) study the single-period supply chain. It is in two-stage under put option contract using a cooperative game approach. It is found out that option contracts can successfully achieve supply chain coordination. Profit allocations are different under different coordination contracts. It depends on the individual risk preferences and negotiating powers of members. However, this study does not consider about bidirectional option contract. A two-stage single-period supply chain under the bidirectional option contract is investigated by Xxxx et al. (2013). The study develops a value-based pricing scheme for supply chain options. The result pricing schemes are more objective and fair. They have greater chances to be accepted by the partners. However, it does not consider the consideration about risk preferences that is important in determining option value. Due to Xxxx et al. (2013), the call option is not attractive much. That ...
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Literatures of the bidirectional option contract

  • STATEWIDE CONTRACT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM If the maximum amount payable to Contractor under this Contract is $100,000 or greater, either on the Effective Date or at any time thereafter, this section shall apply. Contractor agrees to be governed by and comply with the provisions of §§00-000-000, 00-000-000, 00-000-000, and 00- 000-000, C.R.S. regarding the monitoring of vendor performance and the reporting of contract information in the State’s contract management system (“Contract Management System” or “CMS”). Contractor’s performance shall be subject to evaluation and review in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Contract, Colorado statutes governing CMS, and State Fiscal Rules and State Controller policies.

  • Purchase Order Flip via Ariba Network (AN) The online process allows suppliers to submit invoices via the AN for catalog and non- catalog goods and services. Contractors have the ability to create an invoice directly from their Inbox in their AN account by simply “flipping” the purchase order into an invoice. This option does not require any special software or technical capabilities. For the purposes of this section, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider of MFMP the right and license to use, reproduce, transmit, distribute, and publicly display within the system the information outlined above. In addition, the Contractor warrants and represents that it is authorized and empowered to and hereby grants the State and the third-party provider the right and license to reproduce and display within the system the Contractor’s trademarks, system marks, logos, trade dress, or other branding designation that identifies the products made available by the Contractor under the Contract.

  • DISTRIBUTION OF CONTRACTOR PRICE LIST AND CONTRACT APPENDICES Contractor shall provide Authorized Users with electronic copies of the Contract, including price lists and Appendices, upon request. OGS CENTRALIZED CONTRACT MODIFICATIONS Contract Updates will be handled as provided in Appendix C – Contract Modification Procedures.

  • Vendor Encouraging Members to bypass TIPS agreement Encouraging entities to purchase directly from the Vendor or through another agreement, when the Member has requested using the TIPS cooperative Agreement or price, and thereby bypassing the TIPS Agreement is a violation of the terms and conditions of this Agreement and will result in removal of the Vendor from the TIPS Program.

  • OGS Centralized Contract Modifications OGS, an Authorized User, or the Contractor may suggest modifications to the Centralized Contract or its Appendices. Except as specifically provided herein, modifications to the terms and conditions set forth herein may only be made with mutual written agreement of the Parties. Modifications may take the form of an update or an amendment. “

  • Synchronization Rights The Licensor hereby grants limited synchronization rights for One (1) music video streamed online (Youtube, Vimeo, etc..) for up to 500000 non-monetized video streams on all total sites. A separate synchronization license will need to be purchased for distribution of video to Television, Film or Video game.

  • END USER AGREEMENTS (“EUA H-GAC acknowledges that the END USER may choose to enter into an End User Agreement (“EUA) with the Contractor through this Agreement, and that the term of the EUA may exceed the term of the current H-GAC Agreement. H-GAC’s acknowledgement is not an endorsement or approval of the End User Agreement’s terms and conditions. Contractor agrees not to offer, agree to or accept from the END USER, any terms or conditions that conflict with those in Contractor’s Agreement with H-GAC. Contractor affirms that termination of its Agreement with H-GAC for any reason shall not result in the termination of any underlying EUA, which shall in each instance, continue pursuant to the EUA’s stated terms and duration. Pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, termination of this Agreement will disallow the Contractor from entering into any new EUA with END USERS. Applicable H-GAC order processing charges will be due and payable to H-GAC

  • ARTICLE MANAGEMENT RIGHTS The Union acknowledges that all management rights and prerogatives are vested exclusively with the Employer and, without limiting the generality of the foregoing, it is the exclusive function of the Employer:

  • Solicitations for Subcontracts, Including Procurement of Materials and Equipment In all solicitation, either by competitive bidding or negotiation, made by the Contractor for work to be performed under a subcontract, including procurement of materials or leases of equipment, each potential Subcontractor or supplier shall be notified by the Contractor of the Contractor’s obligations under this Agreement and the Regulations relative to non-discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin.

  • Contractor Certification regarding Boycotting Israel Pursuant to Chapter 2270, Texas Government Code, Contractor certifies Contractor (1) does not currently boycott Israel; and (2) will not boycott Israel during the Term of this Agreement. Contractor acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.