False Positive Sample Clauses

A False Positive clause defines how situations are handled when a test or monitoring process incorrectly indicates the presence of a problem or breach that does not actually exist. In practice, this clause typically outlines the procedures for disputing or investigating such erroneous results, and may specify the steps for correcting records or reversing any actions taken based on the false information. Its core function is to prevent parties from being unfairly penalized or subjected to unnecessary remedies due to inaccurate or misleading test outcomes, thereby ensuring fairness and accuracy in contract enforcement.
False Positive. If any one of these individual Service Levels is not met, you may submit a claim for a Service Credit. If one Incident causes us to fail more than one SLA metric for Exchange Online or EOP, you may only make one Service Credit claim for that incident per Service.
View SourceView Similar (21)
False Positive. An anomaly that cannot be reacquired. In a discrimination context, an anomaly that is not what it was thought to be.
View SourceView Similar (4)
False Positive. If a single incident causes Cloudlayer8 to fail more than one of the above metrics, may only make one Service Credit claim for that incident per Service.
View SourceView Similar (2)
False Positive. A security alert that incorrectly indicates the presence of a threat or vulnerability when none exists.
View Source
False Positive. Reported presence or a concentration for a biomarker by a participant in an ICI / EQUAS that has been demonstrated during the evaluation of the ICI/EQUAS not to be present in the control material.
View Source

Related to False Positive

  • Notice of Criminal Activity and Disciplinary Actions A. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ shall immediately report in writing to its assigned System Agency contract manager when ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ learns of or has any reason to believe it or any person with ownership or controlling interest in Grantee, or their agent, employee, subcontractor or volunteer who is providing services under this Grant Agreement has been placed on community supervision, received deferred adjudication, or been indicted for or convicted of a criminal offense relating to involvement in any financial matter, federal or state program or felony sex crime. B. Grantee shall not permit any person who engaged, or was alleged to have engaged, in any activity subject to reporting under this section to perform direct client services or have direct contact with clients, unless otherwise directed in writing by the System Agency.

  • Submitting False Claims; Monetary Penalties The AOC shall be entitled to remedy any false claims, as defined in California Government Code section 12650 et seq., made to the AOC by the Contractor or any Subcontractor under the standards set forth in Government Code section 12650 et seq. Any Contractor or Subcontractor who submits a false claim shall be liable to the AOC for three times the amount of damages that the AOC sustains because of the false claim. A Contractor or Subcontractor who submits a false claim shall also be liable to the AOC for (a) the costs, including attorney fees, of a civil action brought to recover any of those penalties or damages, and (b) a civil penalty of up to $10,000 for each false claim.

  • Corrective Action Despite its right to terminate this Agreement pursuant to this Article, the LHIN may choose not to terminate this Agreement and may take whatever corrective action it considers necessary and appropriate, including suspending Funding for such period as the LHIN determines, to ensure the successful completion of the Services in accordance with the terms of this Agreement.

  • Corrective Actions The Government will use its best efforts to ensure that each Covered Provider (i) takes, where necessary, appropriate and timely corrective actions in response to audits, (ii) considers whether the results of the Covered Provider’s audit necessitates adjustment of the Government’s records, and (iii) permits independent auditors to have access to its records and financial statements as necessary.

  • Corrective Action Plan Within fifteen (15) Business Days following the establishment of the Joint Remediation Committee, the Purchasers, in consultation with the Sellers, shall prepare and submit to the Joint Remediation Committee an initial draft of the Corrective Action Plan. The parties shall work in good faith through the Joint Remediation Committee to finalize the Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days of the Purchasers’ submission of the initial draft of the Correct Action Plan. At the end of such period, if the Sellers reasonably determine that the Corrective Action Plan proposed by the Purchasers (as may be modified over the course of such period) would not reasonably be expected to satisfactorily address the Major Default, then the Sellers may escalate the issue to the Head of Commercial Capital (or equivalent leader of any successor business unit) of the Seller Group and the Chief Executive Officer of the Bank Assets Purchaser (the “Senior Executives”) and the Senior Executives shall work collaboratively (including with the Joint Remediation Committee) to develop a mutually agreeable Corrective Action Plan within fifteen (15) Business Days.