EVALUATION OF Sample Clauses

The 'Evaluation Of' clause defines the process and criteria by which a party's performance, deliverables, or compliance will be assessed under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines who is responsible for conducting the evaluation, the standards or benchmarks to be used, and the timeframe within which the evaluation must occur. For example, it may specify that a client will review a contractor's work within 30 days of delivery, using predefined quality metrics. The core function of this clause is to ensure transparency and objectivity in assessing whether contractual obligations have been met, thereby reducing disputes and clarifying expectations for both parties.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
EVALUATION OF. Bids The Procuring Agency shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITB and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria in deciding to award a Framework Agreement(s). No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. To evaluate a Bid, the Procuring Agency shall consider the following: evaluation will be done for Items or Lots, as specified in the BDS; and the Bid Price as quoted in accordance with ITB 14; price adjustment for correction of arithmetic errors in accordance with ITB 31.1; price adjustment due to discounts offered in accordance with ITB 14.4; Deleted; price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial nonconformities in accordance with ITB 30.3; and the additional evaluation factors are specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Framework Agreement(s) to determine the Contract Price for any Call-off Contract, applied over the Term of the Framework Agreement, shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. If this Bidding document allows Bidders to quote separate prices for different lots (contracts), the methodology to determine the lowest evaluated cost of the lot (contract) combinations, including any discounts offered in the Letter of Bid, is specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of a Bid will exclude and not take into account: in the case of Goods manufactured in India, or goods of foreign origin already located in India, GST and other similar taxes, which will be payable on the Goods if a Call-off Contract is awarded to the Bidder; any allowance for price adjustment during the period of execution of the Call-off Contract, if provided in the Bidding documents and/or Framework Agreement. The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of a Bid may require the consideration of other factors, in addition to the Bid Price quoted in accordance with ITB 14. These factors may be related to the characteristics, performance, and terms and conditions of purchase of the Goods and Related Services or geographic location. The effect of the factors selected, if any, shall be expressed in monetary terms to facilitate comparison of Bids, unless otherwise specified in the BDS from amongst those set out in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The criteria and methodologies to be used shall be as specified in ITB 32.2(f).
View Source
EVALUATION OF. The parties agree that annual assessments of teaching effectiveness by students are valuable in contributing to the improvement of teaching within the University. Departments and Programs shall develop and maintain assessment instruments that are appropriate to their academic disciplines, with assistance from the Interactive Learning Centre. These instruments will be made available to students in all courses on an annual basis. Such assessments will be made available in confidence to the committees and in cases where the member is under consideration for tenure, promotion or merit on :he basis of excellence in teaching. Members shall not be present when the students assess their teaching and assessments shall not be transmitted to the department or program by the members. Departments or programs shall count the number of assessments transmitted annually for each member. Members may read the assessments after final grades are submitted. Each member's be for the confidential information of that member except as noted in or, in other cases, at the member's option. Members shall return the same number of assessments, for personnel decisions, as were submitted after the assessment. Each faculty member shall be encouraged to create a teaching dossier, consisting of annual teaching evaluations and other information the member deems pertinent. Members may also submit these dossiers for consideration in cases of tenure, merit, promotion. The decision not to submit a teaching dossier shall not be held against a member.
View Source
EVALUATION OF. TEACHERS 12 Section 4.1 - Courtesy in Relationships 12 Section 4.2 - Basis of Evaluation/Evaluation Committee 12 Section 4.3 - Evaluation Guidelines 12 Section 4.4- Mechanical Observation or Recording Classroom Activities 13 Section 4.5 - Complaints Against Teachers 13 Section 4.6 - Conference with Supervisor 13 Section 4.7 - Discipline 13
View Source
EVALUATION OF. TEACHERS 12
View Source

Related to EVALUATION OF

  • Evaluation 1. The purposes of evaluation provisions include providing employees with feedback, and employers and employees with the opportunity and responsibility to address concerns. Where a grievance proceeds to arbitration, the arbitrator must consider these purposes, and may relieve on just and reasonable terms against breaches of time limits or other procedural requirements.

  • EVALUATION AND MONITORING The ORGANIZATION agrees to maintain books, records and other documents and evidence, and to use accounting procedures and practices that sufficiently and properly support the complete performance of and the full compliance with this Agreement. The ORGANIZATION will retain these supporting books, records, documents and other materials for at least three (3) calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY and/or the State Auditor and any of their representatives shall have full and complete access to these books, records and other documents and evidence retained by the ORGANIZATION respecting all matters covered in and under this Agreement, and shall have the right to examine such during normal business hours as often as the COUNTY and/or the State Auditor may deem necessary. Such representatives shall be permitted to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and to make audits of all contracts, invoices, materials, and records of matters covered by this Agreement. These access and examination rights shall last for three calendar years following the year in which the Agreement expires. The COUNTY intends without guarantee for its agents to use reasonable security procedures and protections to assure that related records and documents provided by the ORGANIZATION are not erroneously disclosed to third parties. The COUNTY will, however, disclose or make this material available to those authorized by/in the above paragraph or permitted under the provisions of Chapter 42.56 RCW without notice to the ORGANIZATION. The ORGANIZATION shall cooperate with and freely participate in any other monitoring or evaluation activities pertinent to this Agreement that the COUNTY finds needing to be conducted.

  • Evaluations A. District management shall direct the evaluation of all permanent bargaining unit members no less than once every two years and probationary bargaining unit members no less than twice per year. Bargaining unit members who have been employed with VUSD for at least ten (10) years and whose previous evaluation rated the employee as meeting or exceeding standards, may be evaluated at least every five (5) years, if the administrative evaluator and certificated employee being evaluated agree. The certificated employee or the administrative evaluator may withdraw consent of this agreement at any time (EC 44664 (a) (3)). B. The written procedures for evaluations that are currently in effect shall be maintained by the District until the bargaining unit negotiates and ratifies new procedures. The present procedures are in Appendix A. They include: 1. The evaluator shall be an immediate supervisor or any other management or supervisory employee, who is designated by District management. 2. Bargaining unit members may utilize peer review in lieu of management evaluation with principal approval. 3. Those bargaining unit members who are regularly scheduled to be evaluated will be notified by the evaluator no later than October 1st of each school year. Such notice will contain a brief explanation as to the procedures for evaluations 4. One-half of the permanent staff will be formally evaluated each year. a. Pre-Conference Guidelines (for Temporary, Probationary and Permanent Bargaining Unit Members) 1. A pre-conference for bargaining unit members to be evaluated will be held by October 31. The purpose of the pre-conference is to review the Standards for Bargaining Unit Members assignment and to determine the evaluation focus. At that time the evaluator and the bargaining unit member may agree that some elements of the standards are not applicable (NA) to the employee’s assignment and may mark them NA at that time. 2. If there is disagreement about which of the elements is not applicable (NA), the parties may invite the Assistant Superintendent of Certificated Human Resources to assist in resolving the differences. The Assistant Superintendent shall recommend alternatives to the unit member and evaluator.

  • Evaluation of Students A teacher shall maintain the right and responsibility to determine grades and other evaluation of students within the grading policies of the District based upon professional judgment of available criteria pertinent to any given subject area or activity for which the teacher is responsible. No grade or evaluation shall be changed without consultation with the teacher.

  • Final Evaluation IC must submit a final report and a project evaluation to the Arts Commission within thirty (30) days after the completion of the Services. Any and all unexpended funds from IC must be returned to City no later than sixty (60) days after the completion of the Services.