EVALUATION OF Sample Clauses
The 'Evaluation Of' clause defines the process and criteria by which a party's performance, deliverables, or compliance will be assessed under the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines who is responsible for conducting the evaluation, the standards or benchmarks to be used, and the timeframe within which the evaluation must occur. For example, it may specify that a client will review a contractor's work within 30 days of delivery, using predefined quality metrics. The core function of this clause is to ensure transparency and objectivity in assessing whether contractual obligations have been met, thereby reducing disputes and clarifying expectations for both parties.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 1 times
EVALUATION OF. Bids The Procuring Agency shall use the criteria and methodologies listed in this ITB and Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria in deciding to award a Framework Agreement(s). No other evaluation criteria or methodologies shall be permitted. To evaluate a Bid, the Procuring Agency shall consider the following: evaluation will be done for Items or Lots, as specified in the BDS; and the Bid Price as quoted in accordance with ITB 14; price adjustment for correction of arithmetic errors in accordance with ITB 31.1; price adjustment due to discounts offered in accordance with ITB 14.4; Deleted; price adjustment due to quantifiable nonmaterial nonconformities in accordance with ITB 30.3; and the additional evaluation factors are specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The estimated effect of the price adjustment provisions of the Framework Agreement(s) to determine the Contract Price for any Call-off Contract, applied over the Term of the Framework Agreement, shall not be taken into account in Bid evaluation. If this Bidding document allows Bidders to quote separate prices for different lots (contracts), the methodology to determine the lowest evaluated cost of the lot (contract) combinations, including any discounts offered in the Letter of Bid, is specified in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of a Bid will exclude and not take into account: in the case of Goods manufactured in India, or goods of foreign origin already located in India, GST and other similar taxes, which will be payable on the Goods if a Call-off Contract is awarded to the Bidder; any allowance for price adjustment during the period of execution of the Call-off Contract, if provided in the Bidding documents and/or Framework Agreement. The Procuring Agency’s evaluation of a Bid may require the consideration of other factors, in addition to the Bid Price quoted in accordance with ITB 14. These factors may be related to the characteristics, performance, and terms and conditions of purchase of the Goods and Related Services or geographic location. The effect of the factors selected, if any, shall be expressed in monetary terms to facilitate comparison of Bids, unless otherwise specified in the BDS from amongst those set out in Section III, Evaluation and Qualification Criteria. The criteria and methodologies to be used shall be as specified in ITB 32.2(f).
EVALUATION OF. The parties agree that annual assessments of teaching effectiveness by students are valuable in contributing to the improvement of teaching within the University. Departments and Programs shall develop and maintain assessment instruments that are appropriate to their academic disciplines, with assistance from the Interactive Learning Centre. These instruments will be made available to students in all courses on an annual basis. Such assessments will be made available in confidence to the committees and in cases where the member is under consideration for tenure, promotion or merit on :he basis of excellence in teaching. Members shall not be present when the students assess their teaching and assessments shall not be transmitted to the department or program by the members. Departments or programs shall count the number of assessments transmitted annually for each member. Members may read the assessments after final grades are submitted. Each member's be for the confidential information of that member except as noted in or, in other cases, at the member's option. Members shall return the same number of assessments, for personnel decisions, as were submitted after the assessment. Each faculty member shall be encouraged to create a teaching dossier, consisting of annual teaching evaluations and other information the member deems pertinent. Members may also submit these dossiers for consideration in cases of tenure, merit, promotion. The decision not to submit a teaching dossier shall not be held against a member.
EVALUATION OF. TEACHERS 12 Section 4.1 - Courtesy in Relationships 12 Section 4.2 - Basis of Evaluation/Evaluation Committee 12 Section 4.3 - Evaluation Guidelines 12 Section 4.4- Mechanical Observation or Recording Classroom Activities 13 Section 4.5 - Complaints Against Teachers 13 Section 4.6 - Conference with Supervisor 13 Section 4.7 - Discipline 13
EVALUATION OF. TEACHERS 12