Evaluation Method Clause Samples

Evaluation Method. The performance of all employees shall be evaluated in writing. Such evaluations shall be on the standard form provided by the District, based upon observations, and shall acknowledge the strengths of employees as well as deficiencies. The evaluator will inform the employee of any deficiency in performance in a timely manner. If a deficiency is not corrected it may result in a “Does Not Meet Standards” (DNMS) or Unsatisfactory (U) rating on the annual evaluation. Data used to support the District’s assessment for items marked DNMS or U will be shared with the employee. The evaluator shall take into consideration and note in writing any circumstances which may adversely affect an employee's performance, such as workload or physical facilities. The District’s Classified Employee Evaluation Handbook may be amended in consultation with the ESSA. The District will provide an annual evaluation of each ESSA employee by an evaluator not in the ESSA bargaining unit. A supervisor/lead will draft evaluations as input for employee evaluations. It is expected a supervisor/lead will work collaboratively with the evaluator to prepare a final evaluation. The supervisor/lead is not required to sign the final evaluation.

Evaluation Method. The teacher evaluation instrument shall be included as an appendix to the agreement. It is agreed a committee of teachers, administrators, and trustees will be formed to investigate alternate evaluation methods and forms. (Appendix B) Teachers will be evaluated on their overall performance as an employee of the district, according to the criteria in the teacher evaluation instrument.

Evaluation Method. The evaluation of the Tenders is carried out in accordance with the description provided in Annex A. The award criteria used are the Economic Most Advantageous Tender by The Best Price- Quality Ration, based on the following criteria and sub-criteria: Quality 80 % - Key Personnel 65% - Resource Base 35% Price 20 %

Evaluation Method. Only those applications which are responsive and compliant will be evaluated;

Evaluation Method. The evaluation instrument shall be developed by seeking input from classroom teachers, administration, and the Board members. The final selection of the instrument shall be made by the Board. Evaluation of teacher performance shall be done by a properly licensed and endorsed evaluator and must be based on his/her own observations or investigations.

Evaluation Method. Only those applications which are responsive and compliant will be evaluated; • Offers will be evaluated according to the Combined Scoring method – where the technical criteria will be weighted at 70% and the financial offer will be weighted at 30%; • The technical criteria (education, experience, language [max. 70 points] and interview [max.30 points]) will be based on a maximum 100 points; • Only the top 3 candidates scoring 49 points or higher from the review of the education, experience and languages will be considered for the interview; • Candidates obtaining 21 points or higher in the interview will be deemed technically qualified and considered for financial evaluation; • The financial score shall be computed as a ratio of the proposal being evaluated and the lowest priced proposal of those technically qualified; • The financial proposal shall specify an all-inclusive daily fee. In order to assist the requesting unit in the comparison of financial proposals, the financial proposal must additionally include a breakdown of this daily fee (including all foreseeable expenses to carry out the assignment); • The applicant receiving the Highest Combined Score and who has accepted UNDP’s General Terms and Conditions may be awarded the contract.

Evaluation Method. The County will appoint a committee consisting of County staff to evaluate the proposals and to make a recommendation to the County Council. The County will be the sole judge of its own best interests, the proposals, and the resulting Contract, if any. The County’s decisions will be final. Award will be made to the proposal, which presents the best value to the County based on the entire evaluation process and all the information gathered. The County may require the short-listed firm(s), if applicable, to do an oral presentation or have discussions by the proposed team relative to their specific experience on similar projects. The selection process shall be in accordance to CCNA process.

Evaluation Method. Only those applications which are responsive and compliant will be evaluated; • Offers will be evaluated according to the Combined Scoring method – where the technical criteria will be weighted at 70% and the financial offer will be weighted at 30%; • The technical criteria (education, experience, language [max. 80 points] and interview [max.50 points]) will be based on a maximum 130 points; • Only the top 3 candidates scoring 56 points or higher from the review of the education, experience and languages will be considered for the interview; • Applicants obtaining 35 points or higher from the interview will be deemed technically qualified and considered for financial evaluation; • The financial score shall be computed as a ratio of the proposal being evaluated and the lowest priced proposal of those technically qualified; • The financial proposal shall specify an all-inclusive daily fee. In order to assist the requesting unit in the comparison of financial proposals, the financial proposal must additionally include a breakdown of this daily fee (including all foreseeable expenses to carry out the assignment); • Applicant receiving the Highest Combined Score and who has accepted UNDP’s General Terms and Conditions may be awarded the contract. Documentation to be submitted: • Applicants must submit a duly completed and signed UNDP Personal History form (P11) or a CV including Education/Qualification, Professional Certification, Employment Records /Experience.

Evaluation Method. Only those applications which are responsive and compliant will be evaluated; Offers will be evaluated according to the Combined Scoring method – where the technical criteria will be weighted at 70% and the financial offer will be weighted at 30%; The technical criteria (education, experience, language [max. 80 points] and interview [max.50 points]) will be based on a maximum 130 points. Only the top 3 candidates scoring 56 points or higher from the review of the education, experience and languages will be considered for the interview; Applicants obtaining 70% of the combined total technical points (education, experience, languages and interview) will be considered for financial evaluation; The financial score shall be computed as a ratio of the proposal being evaluated and the lowest priced proposal of those technically qualified; The financial proposal shall specify an all-inclusive daily fee. In order to assist the requesting unit in the comparison of financial proposals, the financial proposal must additionally include a breakdown of this daily fee (including all foreseeable expenses to carry out the assignment); Applicant receiving the Highest Combined Score and who has accepted UNDP’s General Terms and Conditions may be awarded the contract. Applicants must submit a duly completed and signed UNDP Personal History form (P11). Kindly note you can upload only ONE document to this application. Incomplete applications will not be considered; Please provide links to at least 2 recent similar assignments including a short description of their nature; Applicants must reply to the mandatory questions asked by the system when submitting the application. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/content/dam/undp/library/corporate/Careers/P11_Personal_history_form.doc. ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/content/dam/undp/documents/procurement/documents/IC%20-%20General%20Conditions.pdf. ----------------------------- ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS I have read, understood and hereby accept UNDP’s General Conditions of Contract for the Services of the Individual Contractors. Have you submitted a duly completed and signed UNDP Personal History form (P11)? Incomplete applications will not be considered. Please provide your all-inclusive daily fee, including all foreseeable expenses, for this assignment. Date ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ UNDP-GEF Executive Coordinator Bureau for Policy and Programme Support United Nations Development Programme ▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇. 9th floor NY, NY 10017 USA Dear ▇▇▇▇▇, I hereby declare that: I have rea...