Evaluation Handbook Clause Samples
Evaluation Handbook. The Lane Community College faculty Developmental Evaluation and Corrective Evaluation processes are the product of a collaborative faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and the Association have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and Association will regularly review this Handbook and solicit suggestions for its improvement. Any proposed changes to the Handbook will be submitted to the Association and College labor relations representative for timely review for conformance with collectively bargained Agreements.
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of this Agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented. Teacher evaluations shall follow the requirements as set out in SDCL Ch. 13-42.
Evaluation Handbook. All teachers new to the District will receive a copy of the evaluation handbook as part of the new employee packet. Other teachers may request a copy of the evaluation handbook from the District.
Evaluation Handbook. The District in collaboration with the Association shall create and finalize an evaluation handbook as a reference tool by December 31, 2020.
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of the negotiated agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented.
Evaluation Handbook. The Southwestern Oregon Community College faculty evaluation 9 (tenure track and tenured evaluation) processes are the product of a collaborative 10 faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and 11 administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which 12 will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of 13 the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and 14 the Faculty Senate have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying 15 statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and