Evaluation Handbook Sample Clauses

Evaluation Handbook. The Lane Community College faculty Developmental Evaluation and Corrective Evaluation processes are the product of a collaborative faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and the Association have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and Association will regularly review this Handbook and solicit suggestions for its improvement. Any proposed changes to the Handbook will be submitted to the Association and College labor relations representative for timely review for conformance with collectively bargained Agreements.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (6)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of the negotiated agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The District in collaboration with the Association shall create and finalize an evaluation handbook as a reference tool by December 31, 2020.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The content of the Evaluation Handbook shall be agreed upon by the parties and is part of this Agreement. The procedures set forth in the handbook shall be implemented. Teacher evaluations shall follow the requirements as set out in SDCL Ch. 13-42.
Sample 1Sample 2
Evaluation Handbook. The Southwestern Oregon Community College faculty evaluation 9 (tenure track and tenured evaluation) processes are the product of a collaborative 10 faculty/administration effort. It is in the joint collegial interest of both the faculty and 11 administration to develop and maintain the highest reasonable evaluation standard, which 12 will result from the continuing collaboration of both parties in the ongoing evolution of 13 the evaluation and developmental standards and processes. Therefore, the College and 14 the Faculty Senate have produced an Evaluation Handbook, which is limited to clarifying 15 statements of the evaluation process, forms, checklists, and instructions. The College and
Sample 1
Evaluation Handbook. All teachers new to the District will receive a copy of the evaluation handbook as part of the new employee packet. Other teachers may request a copy of the evaluation handbook from the District.
Sample 1

Related to Evaluation Handbook

  • Overpayment Policies and Procedures Within 90 days after the Effective Date, Xxxxx shall develop and implement written policies and procedures regarding the identification, quantification and repayment of Overpayments received from any Federal health care program.

  • Employee Handbook (A) If the Contractor has an employee handbook, the Contractor shall include the following information:

  • Company Policies and Procedures 7.1.1 The Company will ensure that Employees are able to readily access Company policies and procedures that apply to the Employees.

  • Evaluation Procedures 7.2.1 Evaluation procedures designed to fairly and adequately assess performance of full- time faculty employees shall be established and reviewed annually by the Vice President, after consultation with appropriate faculty groups at divisional/departmental meetings for their recommendations.

  • Policies and Procedures i) The policies and procedures of the designated employer apply to the employee while working at both sites.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • Sick Leave Reporting and Verification Employees must promptly notify their supervisor on their first day of sick leave and each day after, unless there is mutual agreement to do otherwise. If an employee is in a position where a relief replacement is necessary if they are absent, they will notify their supervisor at least two (2) hours prior to their scheduled time to report to work (excluding leave taken in accordance with the Domestic Violence Act). Unless otherwise precluded by law, the Employer has reason to suspect abuse, the Employer may require a written medical certificate for any sick leave absence. An employee returning to work after any sick leave absence may be required to provide written certification from their health care provider that the employee is able to return to work and perform the essential functions of the job with or without reasonable accommodation.

  • Handbook A. The Contractor shall provide beneficiaries with a copy of the handbook and provider directory when the beneficiary first accesses services and thereafter upon request. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 9, § 1810.360.)

  • Quality Assurance Program An employee shall be entitled to leave of absence without loss of earnings from her or his regularly scheduled working hours for the purpose of writing examinations required by the College of Nurses of Ontario arising out of the Quality Assurance Program.

  • PROCUREMENT ETHICS Contractor understands that a person who is interested in any way in the sale of any supplies, services, construction, or insurance to the State of Utah is violating the law if the person gives or offers to give any compensation, gratuity, contribution, loan, reward, or any promise thereof to any person acting as a procurement officer on behalf of the State of Utah, or who in any official capacity participates in the procurement of such supplies, services, construction, or insurance, whether it is given for their own use or for the use or benefit of any other person or organization.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.