DRC Approval. Upon completion of Tenant’s schematic leasehold design, Tenant shall submit one set of plans for review by Revenue Development and Management (RDM) property manager. Property manager will review plans to ensure Tenant’s design meets space requirements and Permitted Use as defined in Tenant’s Lease. If plans meet Lease requirements, Property Manager will schedule a Preliminary Review with the DRC. Tenant shall submit five copies of plans for Preliminary and subsequent DRC reviews. Full material boards, renderings, plans and elevations are required for DRC meetings. Additional DRC reviews may be required to obtain final design approval. In the event the Tenant needs to change the design once DRC approval has been given, the Tenant must return to DRC for approval of any changes, including substitutions of materials.
DRC Approval. Upon completion of Tenant’s schematic leasehold design, Tenant shall submit plans for review by Revenue Development and Management (RDM) Property Manager and Project Team. Property Manager will review plans to ensure Tenant’s design meets space requirements and Permitted Use as defined in Tenant’s Lease. If plans meet Lease requirements, and have met project sustainability requirements described in the Design Review Committee Guidelines the Property Manager will schedule a Preliminary Review with the DRC. Tenant shall submit six copies of plans for Preliminary and subsequent DRC reviews. Full material boards, renderings, plans and elevations are required for DRC meetings. Additional DRC Reviews may be required to obtain final design approval. In the event the Tenant needs to change the design after DRC Approval has been given, the Tenant must return to the DRC for approval of any changes, including substitutions of materials.
DRC Approval. After approval of the conceptual design palate for the Premises, Tenant may proceed with the formal design review process. Tenant shall submit six copies of plans and an electronic copy for preliminary and subsequent DRC reviews. Full material boards, renderings, plans and elevations are required for DRC meetings (sequence of steps and meeting requirements are outlined in the T1 Design Guidelines). Additional DRC reviews may be required to obtain final design approval. In the event Tenant needs to change the design after DRC approval has been given, Xxxxxx must return to the DRC for approval of any changes, including substitutions of materials that would modify the appearance of the approved design.
DRC Approval. Due to the large number of vested rights in the two overlay zones and the impacts to the Fire District, SSD’s, countywide trail plan, county ridgeline code, and corridor management plans etc. County desires to review all proposals through the Development Review Committee process. The City desires to ensure the Property’s obligations under the overlay zones does not diminish, and that the impacts to the fire district, the SSD’s, the countywide trail plan, the county ridgeline code, and corridor management plan are considered and addressed so as to maintain the compliance of the Property with these guidelines. A completed DRC report is required prior to approvals of any developments in the Property.
DRC Approval. The LUB requires developments that exceed the maximum pre-bonus height limitations provide a public benefit as part of the project. In this case, DRC recommended approval of the developer’s proposal of the public benefit category of the undergrounding of overhead electrical and communication distribution systems. Specifically, DRC’s motion in this regard is as follows: Case 23726: Bonus Zoning Agreement 0000 Xxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx Regional Council Report - 3 - October 5, 2021 “MOVED by Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxx, seconded by Xxxxxx Xxx THAT the Design Review Committee recommend that the Development Officer accept the undergrounding of electrical and communication distribution systems (underground vault for utilities) as the post-bonus public benefit category.
DRC Approval. The LUB requires developments that exceed the maximum pre-bonus height limitations provide a public benefit as part of the project. In this case, the developer proposed, and DRC recommended approval of the public benefit category for undergrounding of wiring and communication distribution systems. Specifically, DRC’s motion in this regard is as follows: “MOVED by Xxxx Xxxxxxx, seconded by Xxxxxxxxx Xxx Xxxxxxxxxx Venart THAT the Design Review Committee: Recommend that the Development Officer accept the public benefit of underground wiring of overhead electrical and communication distribution system as the post-bonus height benefit for the development… MOTION PUT AND PASSED.” Public Benefit Value The extent of the required public benefit is determined by a formula set out in the Downtown Halifax LUB. The by-law determines the extent of the required public benefit by assigning a value to any proposed floor area beyond the maximum pre-bonus floor area ratio. Projects that exceed the maximum pre-bonus floor area ratio are required to contribute a public benefit with a value equivalent to, or greater than the minimum value set out in the By-Law. The LUB establishes a public benefit value that is the equivalent of $4.99 for every 0.1 square metres of gross floor area created by extending above the pre-bonus height. For this project, the maximum pre-bonus allowance is exceeded by 9,805 square metres, resulting in a minimum public benefit value contribution of $489,269.50. The applicant has proposed to meet the bonus requirements under Section 12 of the LUB by providing the public benefit of underground wiring of overhead electrical and communication distribution systems as the post-bonus height public benefit for the development. The total for the entire portion of this project is approximately $596,580. As the proposed public benefit exceeds the minimum required benefit, staff recommend that Regional Council adopt, by resolution, the Incentive or Bonus Zoning Agreement as provided in Attachment B of this report for the development located at 0000 Xxxxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx.
