DRC Approval Sample Clauses

The DRC Approval clause establishes that certain actions, decisions, or transactions require the prior review and consent of the Dispute Resolution Committee (DRC) before proceeding. In practice, this means that parties must submit relevant proposals or issues to the DRC, which will then evaluate and either approve or reject them based on established criteria. This clause ensures oversight and consistency in decision-making, helping to prevent unauthorized actions and maintain governance standards within the organization or agreement.
DRC Approval. Upon completion of Tenant’s schematic leasehold design, Tenant shall submit one set of plans for review by Revenue Development and Management (RDM) property manager. Property manager will review plans to ensure Tenant’s design meets space requirements and Permitted Use as defined in Tenant’s Lease. If plans meet Lease requirements, Property Manager will schedule a Preliminary Review with the DRC. Tenant shall submit five copies of plans for Preliminary and subsequent DRC reviews. Full material boards, renderings, plans and elevations are required for DRC meetings. Additional DRC reviews may be required to obtain final design approval. In the event the Tenant needs to change the design once DRC approval has been given, the Tenant must return to DRC for approval of any changes, including substitutions of materials.
DRC Approval. Upon completion of Tenant’s schematic leasehold design, Tenant shall submit plans for review by Revenue Development and Management (RDM) Property Manager and Project Team. Property Manager will review plans to ensure Tenant’s design meets space requirements and Permitted Use as defined in Tenant’s Lease. If plans meet Lease requirements, and have met project sustainability requirements described in the Design Review Committee Guidelines the Property Manager will schedule a Preliminary Review with the DRC. Tenant shall submit six copies of plans for Preliminary and subsequent DRC reviews. Full material boards, renderings, plans and elevations are required for DRC meetings. Additional DRC Reviews may be required to obtain final design approval. In the event the Tenant needs to change the design after DRC Approval has been given, the Tenant must return to the DRC for approval of any changes, including substitutions of materials.
DRC Approval. After approval of the conceptual design palate for the Premises, Tenant may proceed with the formal design review process. Tenant shall submit six copies of plans and an electronic copy for preliminary and subsequent DRC reviews. Full material boards, renderings, plans and elevations are required for DRC meetings (sequence of steps and meeting requirements are outlined in the T1 Design Guidelines). Additional DRC reviews may be required to obtain final design approval. In the event Tenant needs to change the design after DRC approval has been given, ▇▇▇▇▇▇ must return to the DRC for approval of any changes, including substitutions of materials that would modify the appearance of the approved design.
DRC Approval. Due to the large number of vested rights in the two overlay zones and the impacts to the Fire District, SSD’s, countywide trail plan, county ridgeline code, and corridor management plans etc. County desires to review all proposals through the Development Review Committee process. The City desires to ensure the Property’s obligations under the overlay zones does not diminish, and that the impacts to the fire district, the SSD’s, the countywide trail plan, the county ridgeline code, and corridor management plan are considered and addressed so as to maintain the compliance of the Property with these guidelines. A completed DRC report is required prior to approvals of any developments in the Property.
DRC Approval. The LUB requires developments that exceed the maximum pre-bonus height limitations provide a public benefit as part of the project. In this case, the developer proposed, and DRC recommended approval of the public benefit category for undergrounding of wiring and communication distribution systems. Specifically, DRC’s motion in this regard is as follows: The extent of the required public benefit is determined by a formula set out in the Downtown Halifax LUB. The by-law determines the extent of the required public benefit by assigning a value to any proposed floor area beyond the maximum pre-bonus floor area ratio. Projects that exceed the maximum pre-bonus floor area ratio are required to contribute a public benefit with a value equivalent to, or greater than the minimum value set out in the By-Law. The LUB establishes a public benefit value that is the equivalent of $4.99 for every 0.1 square metres of gross floor area created by extending above the pre-bonus height. For this project, the maximum pre-bonus allowance is exceeded by 9,805 square metres, resulting in a minimum public benefit value contribution of $489,269.50. The applicant has proposed to meet the bonus requirements under Section 12 of the LUB by providing the public benefit of underground wiring of overhead electrical and communication distribution systems as the post-bonus height public benefit for the development. The total for the entire portion of this project is approximately $596,580. As the proposed public benefit exceeds the minimum required benefit, staff recommend that Regional Council adopt, by resolution, the Incentive or Bonus Zoning Agreement as provided in Attachment B of this report for the development located at ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.
DRC Approval. The LUB requires developments that exceed the maximum pre-bonus height limitations provide a public benefit as part of the project. In this case, DRC recommended approval of the developer’s proposal of the public benefit category of the undergrounding of overhead electrical and communication distribution systems. Specifically, DRC’s motion in this regard is as follows:

Related to DRC Approval

  • FCC Approval Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained in this Agreement or in the other Loan Documents, neither the Administrative Agent nor any Lender will take any action pursuant to this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, which would constitute or result in a change in control of the Borrower or any of its Subsidiaries requiring the prior approval of the FCC without first obtaining such prior approval of the FCC. After the occurrence of an Event of Default, the Borrower shall take or cause to be taken any action which the Administrative Agent may reasonably request in order to obtain from the FCC such approval as may be necessary to enable the Administrative Agent to exercise and enjoy the full rights and benefits granted to the Administrative Agent, for the benefit of the Lenders by this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents, including, at the Borrower’s cost and expense, the use of the Borrower’s best efforts to assist in obtaining such approval for any action or transaction contemplated by this Agreement or any of the other Loan Documents for which such approval is required by Law.

  • HSR Approval All applicable waiting periods (and any extensions thereof) under the HSR Act in respect of the Transactions shall have expired or been terminated.

  • NASDAQ Approval The Company shall have filed with Nasdaq a Notification Form: Listing of Additional Shares for the listing of the Shares.

  • Approval/Non-Approval We will notify you whether your Application has been approved or denied within 14 days after the date we receive a completed Application. Notification may be in person or by mail or telephone unless you have requested that notification be by mail. You must not assume approval until you receive actual notice of approval. The 14-day time period may be changed only by separate written agreement.

  • Project Approval The County may issue a Job Order Authorization for the Work, to include the firm-fixed-price of the Job Order and the project duration. Contractor agrees that all clauses of this Contract are applicable to any Job Order issued hereunder. The County reserves the right to reject a Contractor’s Quote based on unjustifiable quantities and/or methods, performance periods, inadequate documentation, or other inconsistencies or deficiencies on the Contractor’s part in the sole opinion of the County. The County reserves the right to issue a unilateral Job Order authorization for the Work if a Quote price cannot be mutually agreed upon. This is based upon unjustifiable quantities in the sole opinion of the County. The County also reserves the right to not issue a Job Order Authorization if the County’s requirement is no longer valid or the project is not funded. In these instances, the Contractor has no right of claim to recover Quote expenses. The County may pursue continuing valid requirements by other means where Contract was not reached with the Contractor.