Demonstrator Sample Clauses
The Demonstrator clause establishes the requirement for one party to provide a working model or prototype of a product or service to the other party. Typically, this clause outlines the specifications, delivery timeline, and evaluation criteria for the demonstrator, ensuring that the receiving party can assess the functionality and suitability of the product before full-scale production or purchase. Its core practical function is to reduce risk and uncertainty by allowing the recipient to verify that the product meets agreed-upon standards before committing to a larger transaction.
Demonstrator. A person who visually demonstrates, on camera, an article, an activity or the use of a service or product, but whose head is not seen.
Demonstrator. A person who visually demonstrates or presents an object, activity or the use of a service or product.
Demonstrator. The manufacturing process of the stiffened panel under consideration is divided in three distinct stages:
1. Stiffener flat laminate lay up (in-situ consolidation)
2. Thermo-formed stiffener (press thermoforming)
3. Flat panel lay up on the ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ feet, performing panel manufacturing and ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ integration in one step (in-situ consolidation)
Demonstrator. This prototype represents the demonstration of a significant step-change in commercial airframe architecture. The project will mature technologies supporting the aircraft configuration that enhance overall sustainability and ensure maximum emissions reductions for a future product family. Ground and flight demonstrations will significantly reduce risk on high aspect ratio aerodynamics, thin wing aeroelastics and integration, external/internal loads, stability and control, and propulsion-airframe integration necessary to create a potential path to a new product family in the 2030s and beyond. TTBW can be an important component in meeting the U.S. Aviation Climate Action Plan 2050 goals.
Demonstrator. In order to verify the actual operability of the general architecture design, we prepared a demonstrator. Since in this first step no real biobanks and real world biobank data were involved, for testing purposes dummy datasets for a "Fake Biobank" and a "Imaginery Biobank" were created (Connector DWH mapper test.xlsx). Further, since the final definition of a core data terminology for the ADOPT / BBMRI ▇▇▇▇ CS IT still has to be defined within other workpackages, a demonstrator dummy core data terminology has been created (MIABIS_Sample_SampleDonor.xlsx) and defined within MDR. The procedure was as followed:
(1) Three namespaces were defined in the Demonstrator MDR (▇▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇-‐test.ccp-‐ ▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇.▇▇/):
(I) Namespace "BBMRI-‐▇▇▇▇ CTD" includes several elements from MIABIS_Sample_SampleDonor.xlsx. This file consists of selected items from MIABIS 2.0, and thus will be the basis for our demonstrator by providing the core terminology.
(II) Namespace "Imaginery Biobank" includes all items from "Fake biobank data for Connector DWH mapper test.xlsx / sheet Imaginary biobank data descript". This will be the namespace of the demo biobank "Imaginery Biobank".
(III) Namespace "Fake Biobank" includes all items from "Fake biobank data for Connector DWH mapper test.xlsx / sheet Fake biobank data descript". This will be the the namespace of the second demo biobank "Fake Biobank".
(2) A parser -‐ MDR2MOLGENIS -‐ with a RESTful interface to the MDR was developed. The input parameter for the parser is the name of a MDR namespace. MDR2MOLGENIS reads all the data elements and their descriptions and subsequently creates a new Excel-‐file with an attributes sheet in accordance to the respective syntax of the MOLGENIS input files. For demonstration purpose, we run it three times with "BBMRI-‐▇▇▇▇ CTD", "Imaginery Biobank", and "Fake Biobank" as input and create three different EMX input files. It will result in obtaining the files "CTD-‐ Molgenis_Target Schema.emx", "Imaginery Biobank.emx", and "Fake Biobank.emx" (Figure 3).
Demonstrator. This shall be the last development sub-task where each aspect of the use case demonstrator shall be fine tuned to provide the final version of the use case demonstrator.
Demonstrator. The demonstrator will also include the registry unit: The registry unit acts as a service discovery entity, where aggregators are required to register their services to, as well as update and delete any service needed, and users can poll the registry unit for information about services or aggregators. In the demonstrator aggregators will communicate with each other, and thus may use the registry unit as users, in order to get information. Finally, in order to cater for the multi- criticality aspect, the service requests come with some extra contextual parameters. Each call to a service is accompanied by a criticality level that the user would like this request to be treated with. The criticality level defines how important a service call is, and will be discussed in detail later in the paper. By using the criticality level of each request, the aggregator unit is able to treat each request differently. The overall aim of the aggregator unit is to provide services to users to a certain level of quality, while also taking into consideration policies defined beforehand, i.e. minimizing energy consumption. The specific service is not assigned high criticality, since the changes in temperature do not take place suddenly but instead gradually. Moreover, the late response in a temperature change does not lead to irreversible effects; hence the chosen criticality is medium.