EXCLUSIONS AND DISCLAIMERS MONDO’S LIABILITY HEREUNDER SHALL BE LIMITED AS SPECIFIED ABOVE, WHICH SHALL BE THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE OBLIGATION OF MONDO HEREUNDER. MONDO SHALL HAVE NO LIABILITY FOR ANY CLAIM WHICH IS NOT A COVERED CLAIM. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL MONDO BE LIABLE FOR LABOR OR ANY OTHER COSTS INCURRED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REPAIR, REMOVAL, INSTALLATION OR REPLACEMENT OF ANY SPECIFIED PRODUCTS COVERED BY THIS LIMITED MATERIAL WARRANTY, EXCEPT AS SPECIFICALLY PROVIDED HEREIN. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCES WILL MONDO BE LIABLE FOR DIRECT OR INDIRECT DAMAGES, LABOR, REMOVAL, INSTALLATION, INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES, FOR LOST PROFITS, LOST SALES, INJURY TO PROPERTY OR ANY OTHER DAMAGES, LOSSES OR CONTINGENCIES DUE TO OR ARISING OUT OF ANY SPECIFIED PRODUCT, WHETHER OR NOT SUBJECT TO A MANUFACTURING DEFECT. THE LIMITED MATERIAL WARRANTY IS VALID ONLY FOR THE SPECIFIED WARRANTY HOLDER AND IS NOT ASSIGNABLE OR TRANSFERABLE UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES. THERE SHALL BE NO THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARIES (INTENDED OR OTHERWISE) HEREUNDER. THIS LIMITED MATERIAL WARRANTY IS IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITATION ANY WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY, HABITABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, AND ALSO IS IN LIEU OF ANY OTHER OBLIGATIONS ON THE PART OF MONDO (CONTRACTUAL, TORT OR OTHERWISE). THIS LIMITED MATERIAL WARRANTY CONSTITUTES THE ONLY WARRANTY MADE BY MONDO AND IS A COMPLETE AND EXCLUSIVE STATEMENT OF ITS OBLIGATIONS. MONDO MAKES NO REPRESENTATIONS, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, NOT SPECIFIED HEREIN. ANY AND ALL REPRESENTATIONS, PROMISES, WARRANTIES OR STATEMENTS BY MONDO’S EMPLOYEES, REPRESENTATIVES, AGENTS, DEALERS, OR DISTRIBUTORS THAT DIFFER, ENHANCE, AMEND OR EXTEND IN ANY MANNER FROM THE TERMS OF THIS WRITTEN LIMITED MATERIAL WARRANTY SHALL BE OF NO FORCE OR EFFECT. NO REPRESENTATIVE, AGENT OR EMPLOYEE OF MONDO, OR ANY OTHER PERSON, IS AUTHORIZED TO ASSUME FOR MONDO ANY ADDITIONAL LIABILITY OR RESPONSIBILITY WITH MONDO FLOOR COVERING EXCEPT AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.
OPINIONS AND DETERMINATIONS Where the terms of this Contract provide for action to be based upon opinion, judgment, approval, review, or determination of either party hereto, such terms are not intended to be and shall never be construed as permitting such opinion, judgment, approval, review, or determination to be arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable.
NOTICES AND DISCLOSURES Behavioral HealthCare Parity This plan provides parity in benefits for behavioral health services. This means that coverage of benefits for mental health and substance use disorders is generally comparable to, and not more restrictive than, the benefits for physical health. Financial requirements, such as deductibles, copayments, or benefit limits that may apply to a behavioral health service benefit category, such as inpatient services, are not more restrictive than those that apply to most medical benefits within the same category. Different levels of financial requirements to different tiers of prescription drugs are applied without regard to whether a prescription drug is generally prescribed for physical, mental health, or substance use disorders. Other requirements are imposed that are not expressed numerically, such as preauthorization, concurrent utilization review, and retrospective utilization review. These are applied to behavioral health services in comparable ways as medical benefits.
MEET AND DISCUSS A. Upon request of either party, the Chancellor and/or designees of the Chancellor shall during the term of this Agreement meet with a committee appointed by the Association for the purpose of discussing matters necessary to the implementation of this Agreement.
Records Audit and Disclosure 5.01 Access to records, books, and documents In addition to any right of access arising by operation of law, Performing Agency and any of Performing Agency’s affiliate or subsidiary organizations, or Subcontractors shall permit the System Agency or any of its duly authorized representatives, as well as duly authorized federal, state or local authorities, unrestricted access to and the right to examine any site where business is conducted or Services are performed, and all records, which includes but is not limited to financial, client and patient records, books, papers or documents related to this Contract. If the Contract includes federal funds, federal agencies that shall have a right of access to records as described in this section include: the federal agency providing the funds, the Comptroller General of the United States, the General Accounting Office, the Office of the Inspector General, and any of their authorized representatives. In addition, agencies of the State of Texas that shall have a right of access to records as described in this section include: the System Agency, HHSC, HHSC's contracted examiners, the State Auditor’s Office, the Texas Attorney General's Office, and any successor agencies. Each of these entities may be a duly authorized authority. If deemed necessary by the System Agency or any duly authorized authority, for the purpose of investigation or hearing, Performing Agency shall produce original documents related to this Contract. The System Agency and any duly authorized authority shall have the right to audit xxxxxxxx both before and after payment, and all documentation that substantiates the xxxxxxxx. Performing Agency shall include this provision concerning the right of access to, and examination of, sites and information related to this Contract in any Subcontract it awards.
Results and Discussion Table 1 (top) shows the root mean square error (RMSE) between the three tests for different numbers of topics. These results show that all three tests largely agree with each other but as the sample size (number of topics) decreases, the agreement decreases. In line with the results found for 50 topics, the randomization and bootstrap tests agree more with the t-test than with each other. We looked at pairwise scatterplots of the three tests at the different topic sizes. While there is some disagreement among the tests at large p-values, i.e. those greater than 0.5, none of the tests would predict such a run pair to have a significant difference. More interesting to us is the behavior of the tests for run pairs with lower p-values. ≥ Table 1 (bottom) shows the RMSE among the three tests for run pairs that all three tests agreed had a p-value greater than 0.0001 and less than 0.5. In contrast to all pairs with p-values 0.0001 (Table 1 top), these run pairs are of more importance to the IR researcher since they are the runs that require a statistical test to judge the significance of the per- formance difference. For these run pairs, the randomization and t tests are much more in agreement with each other than the bootstrap is with either of the other two tests. Looking at scatterplots, we found that the bootstrap tracks the t-test very well but shows a systematic bias to produce p-values smaller than the t-test. As the number of topics de- creases, this bias becomes more pronounced. Figure 1 shows a pairwise scatterplot of the three tests when the number of topics is 10. The randomization test also tends to produce smaller p-values than the t-test for run pairs where the t- test estimated a p-value smaller than 0.1, but at the same time, produces some p-values greater than the t-test’s. As Figure 1 shows, the bootstrap consistently gives smaller p- values than the t-test for these smaller p-values. While the bootstrap and the randomization test disagree with each other more than with the t-test, Figure 1 shows that for a low number of topics, the randomization test shows less noise in its agreement with the bootstrap com- Figure 1: A pairwise comparison of the p-values less than 0.25 produced by the randomization, t-test, and the bootstrap tests for pairs of TREC runs with only 10 topics. The small number of topics high- lights the differences between the three tests. pared to the t-test for small p-values.
Complaints and Disputes 28.1. If the Client wishes to report a complaint, he must send an email to the Company with the completed “Complaints Form” found on the Website. The Company will try to resolve it without undue delay and according to the Company’s Complaints Procedure for Clients.
Calculations and determinations The Calculation Agent shall in respect of each Series of Notes in relation to which it is appointed as such:
CERTIFICATION AND DISCLOSURE REGARDING PAYMENTS TO INFLUENCE CERTAIN FEDERAL TRANSACTIONS (SEP 2007). This clause applies only if this contract exceeds (i) $100,000 if included in Buyer's customer RFP or customer contract issued before October 1, 2010 or (ii) $150,000 if included in Buyer's customer RFP issued on or after October 1, 2010, or if the prime contract was issued prior to October 1, 2010 but was amended after October 1, 2010 to increase the Simplified Acquisition Threshold.
Notice and Disclaimer 2.1. The Data is the property of Xxx Xxxxxxxx and is protected by applicable copyright law. In no event shall User publish, retransmit, display, redistribute, or otherwise reproduce any or all of the Data in any format to anyone, except as allowed in Section 1 of this agreement.
